These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25248524)

  • 21. Evaluation of Lumbar Spine Load by Computational Method in Order to Acknowledge Low-back Disorders as Occupational Diseases.
    Hlávková J; Lebeda T; Tichý T; Gaďourek P; Urban P; Nakládalová M; Laštovková A; Fenclová Z; Ridzoň P; Ehler E; Richter M; Pešáková L; Pelclová D
    Cent Eur J Public Health; 2016 Mar; 24(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 27070971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience.
    Marras WS; Parakkat J; Chany AM; Yang G; Burr D; Lavender SA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16310299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Obesity is associated with reduced disc height in the lumbar spine but not at the lumbosacral junction.
    Urquhart DM; Kurniadi I; Triangto K; Wang Y; Wluka AE; OʼSullivan R; Jones G; Cicuttini FM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jul; 39(16):E962-6. PubMed ID: 24825160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of training on lumbar spine posture and intervertebral disc degeneration in active-duty Marines.
    Rodriguez-Soto AE; Berry DB; Jaworski R; Jensen A; Chung CB; Niederberger B; Qadir A; Kelly KR; Ward SR
    Ergonomics; 2017 Aug; 60(8):1055-1063. PubMed ID: 27788619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Low back load in airport baggage handlers.
    Koblauch H
    Dan Med J; 2016 Apr; 63(4):. PubMed ID: 27034189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prevalence of low back disorders among female workers and biomechanical limits on the handling of load and patients.
    Gutiérrez M; Monzó J
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():2364-9. PubMed ID: 22317069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Difference between male and female workers lifting the same relative load when palletizing boxes.
    Plamondon A; Larivière C; Denis D; Mecheri H; Nastasia I;
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Apr; 60():93-102. PubMed ID: 28166904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Two linear regression models predicting cumulative dynamic L5/S1 joint moment during a range of lifting tasks based on static postures.
    Xu X; Chang CC; Lu ML
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(9):1093-103. PubMed ID: 22803616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of prediction models for the compression force on the lumbosacral disc.
    Kee D; Chung MK
    Ergonomics; 1996 Dec; 39(12):1419-29. PubMed ID: 8969128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vivo loads on a vertebral body replacement during different lifting techniques.
    Dreischarf M; Rohlmann A; Graichen F; Bergmann G; Schmidt H
    J Biomech; 2016 Apr; 49(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 26603872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biomechanical analysis of different back-supporting exoskeletons regarding musculoskeletal loading during lifting and holding.
    Johns J; Schultes I; Heinrich K; Potthast W; Glitsch U
    J Biomech; 2024 May; 168():112125. PubMed ID: 38688184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparative study of methods for establishing load handling capabilities.
    Nicholson AS
    Ergonomics; 1989 Sep; 32(9):1125-44. PubMed ID: 2680481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intervertebral disc height changes after weight reduction in morbidly obese patients and its effect on quality of life and radicular and low back pain.
    Lidar Z; Behrbalk E; Regev GJ; Salame K; Keynan O; Schweiger C; Appelbaum L; Levy Y; Keidar A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Nov; 37(23):1947-52. PubMed ID: 22648024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influencing lumbar posture through real-time biofeedback and its effects on the kinematics and kinetics of a repetitive lifting task.
    Boocock M; Naudé Y; Taylor S; Kilby J; Mawston G
    Gait Posture; 2019 Sep; 73():93-100. PubMed ID: 31302338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Artificial neural networks to predict 3D spinal posture in reaching and lifting activities; Applications in biomechanical models.
    Gholipour A; Arjmand N
    J Biomech; 2016 Sep; 49(13):2946-2952. PubMed ID: 27452877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Manual material handling in the supermarket sector. Part 2: Knee, spine and shoulder joint reaction forces.
    Skals S; Bláfoss R; Andersen LL; Andersen MS; de Zee M
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Apr; 92():103345. PubMed ID: 33444883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of low back disorders risk based on allowable weight limits for manual lifting in Iran.
    Afshari D; Latifi SM; Kord S; Nourollahi-Darabad M
    Ind Health; 2018 Jul; 56(4):327-335. PubMed ID: 29540630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Unilateral ankle immobilization alters the kinematics and kinetics of lifting.
    Beach TA; Frost DM; Clark JM; Maly MR; Callaghan JP
    Work; 2014; 47(2):221-34. PubMed ID: 23324721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A biomechanical analysis of manual lifting tasks performed in restricted workspaces.
    Elfeituri FE
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2001; 7(3):333-46. PubMed ID: 11543701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.