These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25248829)

  • 1. The value of including observational studies in systematic reviews was unclear: a descriptive study.
    Seida J; Dryden DM; Hartling L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Dec; 67(12):1343-52. PubMed ID: 25248829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Observational studies in systematic [corrected] reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
    Norris SL; Atkins D; Bruening W; Fox S; Johnson E; Kane R; Morton SC; Oremus M; Ospina M; Randhawa G; Schoelles K; Shekelle P; Viswanathan M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1178-86. PubMed ID: 21636246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Updating comparative effectiveness reviews: current efforts in AHRQ's Effective Health Care Program.
    Tsertsvadze A; Maglione M; Chou R; Garritty C; Coleman C; Lux L; Bass E; Balshem H; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1208-15. PubMed ID: 21684114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finding evidence for comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
    Relevo R; Balshem H
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1168-77. PubMed ID: 21684115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. AHRQ series paper 4: assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.
    Chou R; Aronson N; Atkins D; Ismaila AS; Santaguida P; Smith DH; Whitlock E; Wilt TJ; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):502-12. PubMed ID: 18823754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative effectiveness research (CER): a summary of AHRQ's CER on therapies for rheumatoid arthritis.
    Oderda GM; Balfe LM
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl B):S19-24. PubMed ID: 22073936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) effective health care (EHC) program methods guide for comparative effectiveness reviews: keeping up-to-date in a rapidly evolving field.
    Chang SM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1166-7. PubMed ID: 21959053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the impact of systematic reviews on future research: two case studies.
    Viswanathan M; Nerz P; Dalberth B; Voisin C; Lohr KN; Tant E; Jonas DE; Carey T
    J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Jul; 1(4):329-46. PubMed ID: 24237467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
    Atkins D; Chang SM; Gartlehner G; Buckley DI; Whitlock EP; Berliner E; Matchar D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1198-207. PubMed ID: 21463926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions: an EPC update.
    Berkman ND; Lohr KN; Ansari MT; Balk EM; Kane R; McDonagh M; Morton SC; Viswanathan M; Bass EB; Butler M; Gartlehner G; Hartling L; McPheeters M; Morgan LC; Reston J; Sista P; Whitlock E; Chang S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Nov; 68(11):1312-24. PubMed ID: 25721570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
    Fu R; Gartlehner G; Grant M; Shamliyan T; Sedrakyan A; Wilt TJ; Griffith L; Oremus M; Raina P; Ismaila A; Santaguida P; Lau J; Trikalinos TA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1187-97. PubMed ID: 21477993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interrater reliability of grading strength of evidence varies with the complexity of the evidence in systematic reviews.
    Berkman ND; Lohr KN; Morgan LC; Kuo TM; Morton SC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Oct; 66(10):1105-1117.e1. PubMed ID: 23993312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Engraving marble and comparative effectiveness reviews.
    Braillon A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 64(12):1468-9. PubMed ID: 22032758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The GRACE checklist for rating the quality of observational studies of comparative effectiveness: a tale of hope and caution.
    Dreyer NA; Velentgas P; Westrich K; Dubois R
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2014 Mar; 20(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 24564810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing equivalence and noninferiority.
    Treadwell JR; Uhl S; Tipton K; Shamliyan T; Viswanathan M; Berkman ND; Sun X; Coleman CI; Elshaug AG; Singh S; Wang SY; Ramakrishnan R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1144-9. PubMed ID: 22732455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.