These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25249469)

  • 1. Developing "Personality" Taxonomies: Metatheoretical and Methodological Rationales Underlying Selection Approaches, Methods of Data Generation and Reduction Principles.
    Uher J
    Integr Psychol Behav Sci; 2015 Dec; 49(4):531-89. PubMed ID: 25249469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpreting "Personality" Taxonomies: Why Previous Models Cannot Capture Individual-Specific Experiencing, Behaviour, Functioning and Development. Major Taxonomic Tasks Still Lay Ahead.
    Uher J
    Integr Psychol Behav Sci; 2015 Dec; 49(4):600-55. PubMed ID: 25311311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conceiving "personality": Psychologist's challenges and basic fundamentals of the Transdisciplinary Philosophy-of-Science Paradigm for Research on Individuals.
    Uher J
    Integr Psychol Behav Sci; 2015 Sep; 49(3):398-458. PubMed ID: 25281293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Taxonomic models of individual differences: a guide to transdisciplinary approaches.
    Uher J
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2018 Apr; 373(1744):. PubMed ID: 29483354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rating scales institutionalise a network of logical errors and conceptual problems in research practices: A rigorous analysis showing ways to tackle psychology's crises.
    Uher J
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1009893. PubMed ID: 36643697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative Data From Rating Scales: An Epistemological and Methodological Enquiry.
    Uher J
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2599. PubMed ID: 30622493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Five-Factor Model personality disorder prototypes: a review of their development, validity, and comparison to alternative approaches.
    Miller JD
    J Pers; 2012 Dec; 80(6):1565-91. PubMed ID: 22321333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Personality psychology: lexical approaches, assessment methods, and trait concepts reveal only half of the story--why it is time for a paradigm shift.
    Uher J
    Integr Psychol Behav Sci; 2013 Mar; 47(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 23389471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of maladaptive variants of Five-Factor Model traits.
    Lynam DR
    J Pers; 2012 Dec; 80(6):1593-614. PubMed ID: 22321444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A mixed-methods study of personality conceptions in the Levant: Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, and the West Bank.
    Zeinoun P; Daouk-Öyry L; Choueiri L; van de Vijver FJR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Sep; 113(3):453-465. PubMed ID: 28594200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical utility of the Five-Factor Model of personality disorder.
    Mullins-Sweatt SN; Lengel GJ
    J Pers; 2012 Dec; 80(6):1615-39. PubMed ID: 22321379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The problem of severity in the classification of personality disorder.
    Tyrer P
    J Pers Disord; 2005 Jun; 19(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 16175739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Five-Factor Model of personality disorder and DSM-5.
    Trull TJ
    J Pers; 2012 Dec; 80(6):1697-720. PubMed ID: 22321203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: a comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches.
    Chen FF; Hayes A; Carver CS; Laurenceau JP; Zhang Z
    J Pers; 2012 Feb; 80(1):219-51. PubMed ID: 22092195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Susceptibility to affect: a comparison of three personality taxonomies.
    Zelenski JM; Larsen RJ
    J Pers; 1999 Oct; 67(5):761-91. PubMed ID: 10540757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mixture modeling methods for the assessment of normal and abnormal personality, part I: cross-sectional models.
    Hallquist MN; Wright AG
    J Pers Assess; 2014; 96(3):256-68. PubMed ID: 24134433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Introduction to the special section on mixture modeling in personality assessment.
    Wright AG; Hallquist MN
    J Pers Assess; 2014; 96(3):253-5. PubMed ID: 24377414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrating normal and abnormal personality structure: the Five-Factor Model.
    Widiger TA; Costa PT
    J Pers; 2012 Dec; 80(6):1471-506. PubMed ID: 22320149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mixture modeling methods for the assessment of normal and abnormal personality, part II: longitudinal models.
    Wright AG; Hallquist MN
    J Pers Assess; 2014; 96(3):269-82. PubMed ID: 24007339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the Utility of Compound Trait Estimates of Narrow Personality Traits.
    Credé M; Harms PD; Blacksmith N; Wood D
    J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(5):503-13. PubMed ID: 27153207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.