These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25249584)

  • 41. A randomized comparison of laparoscopic, flexible endoscopic, and wired and wireless magnetic cameras on ex vivo and in vivo NOTES surgical performance.
    Chang VC; Tang SJ; Swain CP; Bergs R; Paramo J; Hogg DC; Fernandez R; Cadeddu JA; Scott DJ
    Surg Innov; 2013 Aug; 20(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 23060531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. NOTES spin-off for the therapeutic gastroenterologist: natural orifice surgery.
    Watson RR; Thompson CC
    Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol; 2011 Jun; 57(2):177-91. PubMed ID: 21587147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Education and training in NOTES: a systematic review.
    Moghul MR; Sodergren MH; Clark J; Teare J; Yang GZ; Darzi A
    Surg Innov; 2013 Jun; 20(3):282-91. PubMed ID: 23355422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The ANUBIS™ project.
    Dallemagne B; Marescaux J
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2010 Oct; 19(5):257-61. PubMed ID: 20868298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Selection criteria among gastroenterologists and surgeons for laparoscopic antireflux surgery.
    Sarani B; Scanlon J; Jackson P; Evans SR
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Jan; 16(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 11961606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Development and testing of a grasper for NOTES powered by variable stiffness pneumatic actuation.
    Antonelli MG; Beomonte Zobel P; Durante F; Gaj F
    Int J Med Robot; 2017 Sep; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 28078822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Who should do NOTES? Initial endoscopic performance of laparoscopic surgeons compared to gastroenterologists and untrained individuals.
    Wagner OJ; Hagen M; Morel P; Inan I; Candinas D; Vorburger SA
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2008 Oct; 12(10):1724-9. PubMed ID: 18726133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The "ELITE" model: construct validation of a new training system for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).
    Gillen S; Wilhelm D; Meining A; Fiolka A; Doundoulakis E; Schneider A; von Delius S; Friess H; Feussner H
    Endoscopy; 2009 May; 41(5):395-9. PubMed ID: 19418392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. NOTES--A new era?
    Zehetner J; Wayand WU
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2008; 55(81):8-12. PubMed ID: 18507068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Transvaginal hybrid natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery appendectomy].
    Wada N; Tanabe M; Kataoka F; Kitagawa Y
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Nov; 114(6):308-11. PubMed ID: 24358726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Mechatronic assistant system for dental drill handling.
    Ortiz Simon JL; Martinez AM; Espinoza DL; Romero Velazquez JG
    Int J Med Robot; 2011 Mar; 7(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 21341359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A new robot for flexible ureteroscopy: development and early clinical results (IDEAL stage 1-2b).
    Saglam R; Muslumanoglu AY; Tokatlı Z; Caşkurlu T; Sarica K; Taşçi Aİ; Erkurt B; Süer E; Kabakci AS; Preminger G; Traxer O; Rassweiler JJ
    Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1092-100. PubMed ID: 25059998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Development of tasks and evaluation of a prototype forceps for NOTES.
    Addis M; Aguirre M; Frecker M; Haluck R; Matthew A; Pauli E; Gopal J
    JSLS; 2012; 16(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 22906337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. SPIDER and flexible laparoscopy: the next frontier in abdominal surgery.
    Villamizar N; Pryor AD
    Surg Technol Int; 2010 Oct; 20():53-8. PubMed ID: 21082549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Application of design rationale for a robotic system for single-incision laparoscopic surgery and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.
    Yao W; Childs PR
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jul; 227(7):821-30. PubMed ID: 23674579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Prosthetic devices: challenges and implications of robotic implants and biological interfaces.
    Lai JC; Schoen MP; Perez Gracia A; Naidu DS; Leung SW
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 Feb; 221(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 17385571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Knowledge of indications for EUS among gastroenterologists and non-gastroenterologists.
    Yusuf TE; Harewood GC; Clain JE; Levy MJ; Wang KK; Topazian MD; Rajan E
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2004 Oct; 60(4):575-9. PubMed ID: 15472681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Orientation strategies in natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery.
    Sodergren MH; Orihuela-Espina F; Mountney P; Clark J; Teare J; Darzi A; Yang GZ
    Ann Surg; 2011 Aug; 254(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 21691197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Natural orifice surgery (NOTES) and biliary disease, is there a role?
    Potter K; Swanstrom L
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg; 2009; 16(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 19387528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Transrectal Rigid-Hybrid Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Sigmoidectomy for Diverticular Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study.
    Lamm SH; Zerz A; Efeoglou A; Steinemann DC
    J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Oct; 221(4):789-97. PubMed ID: 26282488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.