These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2525019)

  • 1. The effect of new monofilament absorbable sutures on the healing of musculoaponeurotic incisions, gastrotomies, and colonic anastomoses.
    Foresman PA; Edlich RF; Rodeheaver GT
    Arch Surg; 1989 Jun; 124(6):708-10. PubMed ID: 2525019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of glycomer 631 monofilament sutures in closing musculoaponeurotic incisions.
    Rodeheaver GT; Salopek LS; Green CW; Foresman PA; Suber F; Neal JG; Edlich RF
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1998; 8(3-4):225-31. PubMed ID: 10186968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Duration of wound healing and tissue resistance as important criteria for selecting suture materials in colon surgery].
    Lünstedt B; Debus S
    Chirurg; 1990 Oct; 61(10):717-9. PubMed ID: 2276302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of suture materials on healing wounds of the stomach and colon.
    Hastings JC; Winkle WV; Barker E; Hines D; Nichols W
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 May; 140(5):701-7. PubMed ID: 1145404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of the distance between interrupted sutures and the tension of sutures on the healing of experimental colonic anastomoses.
    Waninger J; Kauffmann GW; Shah IA; Farthmann EH
    Am J Surg; 1992 Mar; 163(3):319-23. PubMed ID: 1539766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical and clinical performance of a new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture.
    Rodeheaver GT; Beltran KA; Green CW; Faulkner BC; Stiles BM; Stanimir GW; Traeland H; Fried GM; Brown HC; Edlich RF
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1996; 6(3-4):181-98. PubMed ID: 10167360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of suture materials on healing wounds of the bladder.
    Hastings JC; Van Winkle W; Barker E; Hines D; Nichols W
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jun; 140(6):933-7. PubMed ID: 1129685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abdominal wound closure. A comparison of polydioxanone, polypropylene, and Teflon-coated braided Dacron sutures.
    Kon ND; Meredith JW; Poole GV; Martin MB; Kawamoto E; Myers RT
    Am Surg; 1984 Oct; 50(10):549-51. PubMed ID: 6237599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Maxon and PDS--evaluation and physical and biologic properties of monofilament absorbable suture materials].
    Knoop M; Lünstedt B; Thiede A
    Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1987; 371(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 3114577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vivo assessment of absorbable knotless barbed suture for single layer gastrotomy and enterotomy closure.
    Ehrhart NP; Kaminskaya K; Miller JA; Zaruby JF
    Vet Surg; 2013 Feb; 42(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 23373618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of parenteral nutrition on the healing of abdominal wall wounds and colonic anastomoses in protein-malnourished rats.
    Law NW; Ellis H
    Surgery; 1990 Apr; 107(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 2138825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of sutures for use in colonic surgery: an experimental study.
    Durdey P; Bucknall TE
    J R Soc Med; 1984 Jun; 77(6):472-7. PubMed ID: 6429330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of oxygen therapy in the healing of experimental skin wounds and colonic anastomosis.
    Kirk D; Irvin TT
    Br J Surg; 1977 Feb; 64(2):100-3. PubMed ID: 890244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Suture technique and early breaking strength of intestinal anastomoses and laparotomy wounds.
    Högström H; Haglund U; Zederfeldt B
    Acta Chir Scand; 1985; 151(5):441-3. PubMed ID: 3901638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tensile properties of synthetic, absorbable monofilament suture materials before and after incubation in phosphate-buffered saline.
    Tobias KM; Kidd CE; Mulon PY; Zhu X
    Vet Surg; 2020 Apr; 49(3):550-560. PubMed ID: 31599002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats.
    Sanz LE; Patterson JA; Kamath R; Willett G; Ahmed SW; Butterfield AB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):418-22. PubMed ID: 3126470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anastomotic healing in the rat colon: comparison between a radiological method, breaking strength and bursting pressure.
    Månsson P; Zhang XW; Jeppsson B; Thorlacius H
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2002 Nov; 17(6):420-5. PubMed ID: 12355219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of different absorbable sutures on healing of gastrointestinal anastomoses.
    Deveney KE; Way LW
    Am J Surg; 1977 Jan; 133(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 835784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bursting strength of the rat aorta: comparison of suture and laser anastomoses.
    Bürger RA; Gerharz CD; Seitzmayer M; Engelmann U; Hohenfellner R
    Urol Int; 1991; 47(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 1871913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative study of polydioxanone (PDS) and polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) in colonic anastomoses in rats.
    Andersen E; Søndenaa K; Holter J
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 1989 Dec; 4(4):251-4. PubMed ID: 2515237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.