These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25250198)

  • 1. Potential Medicaid cost savings from maternity care based at a freestanding birth center.
    Howell E; Palmer A; Benatar S; Garrett B
    Medicare Medicaid Res Rev; 2014; 4(3):. PubMed ID: 25250198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Midwifery and Birth Centers Under State Medicaid Programs: Current Limits to Beneficiary Access to a High-Value Model of Care.
    Courtot B; Hill I; Cross-Barnet C; Markell J
    Milbank Q; 2020 Dec; 98(4):1091-1113. PubMed ID: 32930433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost effectiveness of alternative planned places of birth in woman at low risk of complications: evidence from the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study.
    Schroeder E; Petrou S; Patel N; Hollowell J; Puddicombe D; Redshaw M; Brocklehurst P;
    BMJ; 2012 Apr; 344():e2292. PubMed ID: 22517916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medicaid savings from the Contraceptive CHOICE Project: a cost-savings analysis.
    Madden T; Barker AR; Huntzberry K; Secura GM; Peipert JF; McBride TD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Dec; 219(6):595.e1-595.e11. PubMed ID: 30194049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of the impact of maternity care coordination on Medicaid birth outcomes in North Carolina.
    Buescher PA; Roth MS; Williams D; Goforth CM
    Am J Public Health; 1991 Dec; 81(12):1625-9. PubMed ID: 1746659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Midwifery care at a freestanding birth center: a safe and effective alternative to conventional maternity care.
    Benatar S; Garrett AB; Howell E; Palmer A
    Health Serv Res; 2013 Oct; 48(5):1750-68. PubMed ID: 23586867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Potential unintended pregnancies averted and cost savings associated with a revised Medicaid sterilization policy.
    Borrero S; Zite N; Potter JE; Trussell J; Smith K
    Contraception; 2013 Dec; 88(6):691-6. PubMed ID: 24028751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Family Health and Birth Center--a nurse-midwife-managed center in Washington, DC.
    Lubic RW; Flynn C
    Altern Ther Health Med; 2010; 16(5):58-60. PubMed ID: 20882732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medicaid covered births, 2008 through 2010, in the context of the implementation of health reform.
    Markus AR; Andres E; West KD; Garro N; Pellegrini C
    Womens Health Issues; 2013; 23(5):e273-80. PubMed ID: 23993475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Freestanding midwifery units: Maternal and neonatal outcomes following transfer.
    Monk AR; Grigg CP; Foureur M; Tracy M; Tracy SK
    Midwifery; 2017 Mar; 46():24-28. PubMed ID: 28126592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The economic costs of intrapartum care in Tower Hamlets: A comparison between the cost of birth in a freestanding midwifery unit and hospital for women at low risk of obstetric complications.
    Schroeder L; Patel N; Keeler M; Rocca-Ihenacho L; Macfarlane AJ
    Midwifery; 2017 Feb; 45():28-35. PubMed ID: 27984773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Justified skepticism about Apgar scoring in out-of-hospital birth settings.
    Grünebaum A; McCullough LB; Brent RL; Arabin B; Levene MI; Chervenak FA
    J Perinat Med; 2015 Jul; 43(4):455-60. PubMed ID: 24756040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An alternative model of maternity care for low-risk birth: Maternal and neonatal outcomes utilizing the midwifery-based birth center model.
    Wallace J; Hoehn-Velasco L; Tilden E; Dowd BE; Calvin S; Jolles DR; Wright J; Stapleton S
    Health Serv Res; 2024 Feb; 59(1):e14222. PubMed ID: 37691323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Return on investment: a fuller assessment of the benefits and cost savings of the US publicly funded family planning program.
    Frost JJ; Sonfield A; Zolna MR; Finer LB
    Milbank Q; 2014 Dec; 92(4):696-749. PubMed ID: 25314928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Strong Start in birth centers: Socio-demographic characteristics, care processes, and outcomes for mothers and newborns.
    Alliman J; Stapleton SR; Wright J; Bauer K; Slider K; Jolles D
    Birth; 2019 Jun; 46(2):234-243. PubMed ID: 31102319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of care for very low birth weight infants.
    Rogowski J
    Pediatrics; 1998 Jul; 102(1 Pt 1):35-43. PubMed ID: 9651411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Apgar score of 0 at 5 minutes and neonatal seizures or serious neurologic dysfunction in relation to birth setting.
    Grünebaum A; McCullough LB; Sapra KJ; Brent RL; Levene MI; Arabin B; Chervenak FA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 209(4):323.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23791692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Cost of Home Birth in the United States.
    Anderson DA; Gilkison GM
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(19):. PubMed ID: 34639661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rural community birth: Maternal and neonatal outcomes for planned community births among rural women in the United States, 2004-2009.
    Nethery E; Gordon W; Bovbjerg ML; Cheyney M
    Birth; 2018 Jun; 45(2):120-129. PubMed ID: 29131385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trends and characteristics of home and other out-of-hospital births in the United States, 1990-2006.
    MacDorman MF; Menacker F; Declercq E
    Natl Vital Stat Rep; 2010 Mar; 58(11):1-14, 16. PubMed ID: 20575315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.