These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25250198)

  • 21. The BirthPlace collaborative practice model: results from the San Diego Birth Center Study.
    Swartz W; Jackson D; Lang J; Ecker J; Ganiats T; Dickinson C; Nguyen U
    Prim Care Update Ob Gyns; 1998 Jul; 5(4):207. PubMed ID: 10838392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Outcomes of independent midwifery attended births in birth centres and home births: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.
    Kataoka Y; Eto H; Iida M
    Midwifery; 2013 Aug; 29(8):965-72. PubMed ID: 23415360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. What do women in Medicaid say about enhanced prenatal care? Findings from the national Strong Start evaluation.
    Hill I; Cross-Barnet C; Courtot B; Benatar S; Thornburgh S
    Birth; 2019 Jun; 46(2):244-252. PubMed ID: 31087393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Midwifery care in rural and remote British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study of perinatal outcomes of rural parturient women with a midwife involved in their care, 2003 to 2008.
    Stoll K; Kornelsen J
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 24588878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Outcomes of childbearing Medicaid beneficiaries engaged in care at Strong Start birth center sites between 2012 and 2014.
    Jolles DR; Langford R; Stapleton S; Cesario S; Koci A; Alliman J
    Birth; 2017 Dec; 44(4):298-305. PubMed ID: 28850706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study.
    Christensen LF; Overgaard C
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jan; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 28068929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Strong Start Innovation: Equitable Outcomes Across Public and Privately Insured Clients Receiving Birth Center Care.
    Jolles D; Hoehn-Velasco L; Ross L; Stapleton S; Joseph J; Alliman J; Bauer K; Marcelle E; Wright J
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2022 Nov; 67(6):746-752. PubMed ID: 36480161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Impact of Medicaid Managed Care on Obstetrical Care and Birth Outcomes: A Case Study.
    Yan J
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2020 Feb; 29(2):167-176. PubMed ID: 31702431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Birth Outcomes of Women with Obesity Enrolled for Care at Freestanding Birth Centers in the United States.
    Jevitt CM; Stapleton S; Deng Y; Song X; Wang K; Jolles DR
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2021 Jan; 66(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 33377279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Birth centres: financially viable?
    O'Sullivan S; Tyler S
    RCM Midwives; 2007; 10(10):481-3. PubMed ID: 18041323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Outcomes of care in birth centers: demonstration of a durable model.
    Stapleton SR; Osborne C; Illuzzi J
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2013; 58(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 23363029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Expanding Medicaid coverage for pregnant women: estimates of the impact and cost.
    Torres A; Kenney AM
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1989; 21(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 2649392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Weighing costs and benefits of adequate prenatal care for 12,023 births in Missouri's Medicaid program, 1988.
    Schramm WF
    Public Health Rep; 1992; 107(6):647-52. PubMed ID: 1454976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Savings achieved by giving WIC benefits to women prenatally.
    Avruch S; Cackley AP
    Public Health Rep; 1995; 110(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 7838940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A benefit-cost analysis of family planning services in Iowa.
    Levey LM; Nyman JA; Haugaard J
    Eval Health Prof; 1988 Dec; 11(4):403-24. PubMed ID: 10312809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Group Prenatal Care Results in Medicaid Savings with Better Outcomes: A Propensity Score Analysis of CenteringPregnancy Participation in South Carolina.
    Gareau S; Lòpez-De Fede A; Loudermilk BL; Cummings TH; Hardin JW; Picklesimer AH; Crouch E; Covington-Kolb S
    Matern Child Health J; 2016 Jul; 20(7):1384-93. PubMed ID: 26979611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Economic implications of home births and birth centers: a structured review.
    Henderson J; Petrou S
    Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):136-46. PubMed ID: 18507585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia.
    Monk A; Tracy M; Foureur M; Grigg C; Tracy S
    BMJ Open; 2014 Oct; 4(10):e006252. PubMed ID: 25361840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Dutch Birth Centre Study: study design of a programmatic evaluation of the effect of birth centre care in the Netherlands.
    Hermus MA; Wiegers TA; Hitzert MF; Boesveld IC; van den Akker-van Marle ME; Akkermans HA; Bruijnzeels MA; Franx A; de Graaf JP; Rijnders ME; Steegers EA; van der Pal-de Bruin KM
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Jul; 15():148. PubMed ID: 26174336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Roots Community Birth Center: A culturally-centered care model for improving value and equity in childbirth.
    Hardeman RR; Karbeah J; Almanza J; Kozhimannil KB
    Healthc (Amst); 2020 Mar; 8(1):100367. PubMed ID: 31371235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.