BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25251853)

  • 1. The relations between recombination rate and patterns of molecular variation and evolution in Drosophila.
    Charlesworth B; Campos JL
    Annu Rev Genet; 2014; 48():383-403. PubMed ID: 25251853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetic recombination and molecular evolution.
    Charlesworth B; Betancourt AJ; Kaiser VB; Gordo I
    Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol; 2009; 74():177-86. PubMed ID: 19734202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relation between recombination rate and patterns of molecular evolution and variation in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Campos JL; Halligan DL; Haddrill PR; Charlesworth B
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Apr; 31(4):1010-28. PubMed ID: 24489114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intragenic Hill-Robertson interference influences selection intensity on synonymous mutations in Drosophila.
    Comeron JM; Guthrie TB
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2519-30. PubMed ID: 16120803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Natural selection in gene-dense regions shapes the genomic pattern of polymorphism in wild and domesticated rice.
    Flowers JM; Molina J; Rubinstein S; Huang P; Schaal BA; Purugganan MD
    Mol Biol Evol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):675-87. PubMed ID: 21917724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hill-Robertson interference is a minor determinant of variations in codon bias across Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans genomes.
    Marais G; Piganeau G
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Sep; 19(9):1399-406. PubMed ID: 12200468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptive Evolution Is Substantially Impeded by Hill-Robertson Interference in Drosophila.
    Castellano D; Coronado-Zamora M; Campos JL; Barbadilla A; Eyre-Walker A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Feb; 33(2):442-55. PubMed ID: 26494843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recombination modulates how selection affects linked sites in Drosophila.
    McGaugh SE; Heil CS; Manzano-Winkler B; Loewe L; Goldstein S; Himmel TL; Noor MA
    PLoS Biol; 2012; 10(11):e1001422. PubMed ID: 23152720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mutation pressure, natural selection, and the evolution of base composition in Drosophila.
    Akashi H; Kliman RM; Eyre-Walker A
    Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):49-60. PubMed ID: 9720271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of deleterious mutations on evolution in non-recombining genomes.
    Kaiser VB; Charlesworth B
    Trends Genet; 2009 Jan; 25(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 19027982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Background selection as null hypothesis in population genomics: insights and challenges from
    Comeron JM
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2017 Dec; 372(1736):. PubMed ID: 29109230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduced efficacy of selection in regions of the Drosophila genome that lack crossing over.
    Haddrill PR; Halligan DL; Tomaras D; Charlesworth B
    Genome Biol; 2007; 8(2):R18. PubMed ID: 17284312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effects on Neutral Variability of Recurrent Selective Sweeps and Background Selection.
    Campos JL; Charlesworth B
    Genetics; 2019 May; 212(1):287-303. PubMed ID: 30923166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variation in synonymous codon use and DNA polymorphism within the Drosophila genome.
    Bierne N; Eyre-Walker A
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Jan; 19(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 16405571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fine-scale mapping of recombination rate in Drosophila refines its correlation to diversity and divergence.
    Kulathinal RJ; Bennett SM; Fitzpatrick CL; Noor MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Jul; 105(29):10051-6. PubMed ID: 18621713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating the parameters of background selection and selective sweeps in
    Campos JL; Zhao L; Charlesworth B
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Jun; 114(24):E4762-E4771. PubMed ID: 28559322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reduced effectiveness of selection caused by a lack of recombination.
    Betancourt AJ; Welch JJ; Charlesworth B
    Curr Biol; 2009 Apr; 19(8):655-60. PubMed ID: 19285399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic and evolutionary correlates of fine-scale recombination rate variation in Drosophila persimilis.
    Stevison LS; Noor MA
    J Mol Evol; 2010 Dec; 71(5-6):332-45. PubMed ID: 20890595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extreme recombination frequencies shape genome variation and evolution in the honeybee, Apis mellifera.
    Wallberg A; Glémin S; Webster MT
    PLoS Genet; 2015 Apr; 11(4):e1005189. PubMed ID: 25902173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patterns of Genetic Variability in Genomic Regions with Low Rates of Recombination.
    Becher H; Jackson BC; Charlesworth B
    Curr Biol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):94-100.e3. PubMed ID: 31866366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.