These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25252438)

  • 21. Comparison of multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring and reflux scintigraphy in pediatric patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux.
    Uslu Kızılkan N; Bozkurt MF; Saltık Temizel IN; Demir H; Yüce A; Caner B; Özen H
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 22(43):9595-9603. PubMed ID: 27920480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH-metry for investigation of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease.
    Weigt J; Mönkemüller K; Peitz U; Malfertheiner P
    Dig Dis; 2007; 25(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 17827936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Swallow evaluation during multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH: an alternate method to assess esophageal transit.
    Hila A; Chowdhury N; Hajar N; Castell DO
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2011; 45(10):862-6. PubMed ID: 21857530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Wireless 'mini' multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH: what is the optimal design of a miniature wireless device?
    Heard R; Sharma N; Roberts J; Castell D; Pohl D
    Dis Esophagus; 2014 Jul; 27(5):424-7. PubMed ID: 22978791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Update in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
    Tutuian R
    J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2006 Sep; 15(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 17013449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Combined pH-metry/impedance monitoring increases the diagnostic yield in patients with atypical gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.
    Bajbouj M; Becker V; Neuber M; Schmid RM; Meining A
    Digestion; 2007; 76(3-4):223-8. PubMed ID: 18174685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Utilization of wireless pH monitoring technologies: a summary of the proceedings from the esophageal diagnostic working group.
    Richter JE; Pandolfino JE; Vela MF; Kahrilas PJ; Lacy BE; Ganz R; Dengler W; Oelschlager BK; Peters J; DeVault KR; Fass R; Gyawali CP; Conklin J; DeMeester T;
    Dis Esophagus; 2013; 26(8):755-65. PubMed ID: 22882487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring in patients with therapy-resistant reflux symptoms: 'on' or 'off' proton pump inhibitor?
    Hemmink GJ; Bredenoord AJ; Weusten BL; Monkelbaan JF; Timmer R; Smout AJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Oct; 103(10):2446-53. PubMed ID: 18684197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Added Value of pH Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance in Adults Operated for Esophageal Atresia.
    Gatzinsky V; Andersson O; Eriksson A; Jönsson L; Abrahamsson K; Sillén U
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2016 Apr; 26(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 25643247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Patients with refractory reflux symptoms often do not have GERD.
    Herregods TV; Troelstra M; Weijenborg PW; Bredenoord AJ; Smout AJ
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2015 Sep; 27(9):1267-73. PubMed ID: 26088946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Gastroesophageal reflux evaluation in patients affected by chronic cough: Restech versus multichannel intraluminal impedance/pH metry.
    Ummarino D; Vandermeulen L; Roosens B; Urbain D; Hauser B; Vandenplas Y
    Laryngoscope; 2013 Apr; 123(4):980-4. PubMed ID: 23023943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [24-hour esophageal impedance-ph monitoring: technical aspects, indications and results].
    Karoui S; Ben Temime H; Serghini M; Zouiten L; Boubaker J; Filali A
    Tunis Med; 2012 May; 90(5):351-6. PubMed ID: 22585640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Twenty-four hour ambulatory simultaneous impedance and pH monitoring: a multicenter report of normal values from 60 healthy volunteers.
    Shay S; Tutuian R; Sifrim D; Vela M; Wise J; Balaji N; Zhang X; Adhami T; Murray J; Peters J; Castell D
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 99(6):1037-43. PubMed ID: 15180722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impedance-pH testing.
    Villa N; Vela MF
    Gastroenterol Clin North Am; 2013 Mar; 42(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 23452628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The added value of impedance-pH monitoring to Rome III criteria in distinguishing functional heartburn from non-erosive reflux disease.
    Savarino E; Marabotto E; Zentilin P; Frazzoni M; Sammito G; Bonfanti D; Sconfienza L; Assandri L; Gemignani L; Malesci A; Savarino V
    Dig Liver Dis; 2011 Jul; 43(7):542-7. PubMed ID: 21376679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring may be an inadequate test for detecting gastroesophageal reflux in patients with mixed typical and atypical symptoms.
    Han MS; Lada MJ; Nieman DR; Tschoner A; Peyre CG; Jones CE; Watson TJ; Peters JH
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Jul; 29(7):1700-8. PubMed ID: 25398192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Laboratory based investigations for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease.
    Dolder M; Tutuian R
    Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Dec; 24(6):787-98. PubMed ID: 21126694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A new method to estimate catheter length for esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance monitoring in children.
    Mutalib M; Sintusek P; Punpanich D; Thapar N; Lindley K
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2015 May; 27(5):728-33. PubMed ID: 25824711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Utilising multichannel intraluminal impedance for diagnosing GERD: a review.
    Wise JL; Murray JA
    Dis Esophagus; 2007; 20(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 17439589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of Esophageal Mucosal Integrity in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.
    Matsumura T; Arai M; Ishigami H; Fujie M; Ishikawa K; Akizue N; Taida T; Ohta Y; Hamanaka S; Okimoto K; Saito K; Maruoka D; Nakagawa T; Kato N
    Digestion; 2018; 97(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 29393167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.