These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
822 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25252733)
1. A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis. Puhan MA; Schünemann HJ; Murad MH; Li T; Brignardello-Petersen R; Singh JA; Kessels AG; Guyatt GH; BMJ; 2014 Sep; 349():g5630. PubMed ID: 25252733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. Guyatt GH; Oxman AD; Schünemann HJ; Tugwell P; Knottnerus A J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 21185693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Synthesis, grading, and presentation of evidence in guidelines: article 7 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report. Guyatt G; Akl EA; Oxman A; Wilson K; Puhan MA; Wilt T; Gutterman D; Woodhead M; Antman EM; Schünemann HJ; Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):256-61. PubMed ID: 23256168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Guideline panels should not GRADE good practice statements. Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ; Djulbegovic B; Akl EA J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 May; 68(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 25660962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical practice guidelines. Twaddle S Singapore Med J; 2005 Dec; 46(12):681-6; quiz 687. PubMed ID: 16308640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (confidence in the estimates of effect)]. Meerpohl JJ; Langer G; Perleth M; Gartlehner G; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Schünemann H Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(6):449-56. PubMed ID: 22857733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. Guyatt GH; Oxman AD; Kunz R; Atkins D; Brozek J; Vist G; Alderson P; Glasziou P; Falck-Ytter Y; Schünemann HJ J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 21194891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The GRADE system: a change in the way of assessing the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations]. Neumann I; Pantoja T; Peñaloza B; Cifuentes L; Rada G Rev Med Chil; 2014 May; 142(5):630-5. PubMed ID: 25427021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adherence to evidence-based guidelines is the key to improved health outcomes for general practice patients: NO. Mangin D J Prim Health Care; 2012 Jun; 4(2):158-60. PubMed ID: 22675701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Guidelines are made more transparent with the GRADE method: considerations for recommendations are explicit in the new method]. Boluyt N; Rottier BL; Langendam MW Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(25):A4379. PubMed ID: 22748366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Included in Systematic Reviews)]. Schuetz GM; Tackmann R; Hamm B; Dewey M Rofo; 2010 Nov; 182(11):939-42. PubMed ID: 20922647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Need for high-standard translation methodology for the dissemination of guidelines. Henrotin Y Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2009 Dec; 17(12):1536-8. PubMed ID: 19583960 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions. Brozek JL; Akl EA; Alonso-Coello P; Lang D; Jaeschke R; Williams JW; Phillips B; Lelgemann M; Lethaby A; Bousquet J; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ; Allergy; 2009 May; 64(5):669-77. PubMed ID: 19210357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality and strength: the GRADE system for formulating recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Alonso-Coello P; Rigau D; Sanabria AJ; Plaza V; Miravitlles M; Martinez L Arch Bronconeumol; 2013 Jun; 49(6):261-7. PubMed ID: 23434203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes]. Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Gartlehner G; Kien C; Meerpohl JJ; Langer G; Perleth M; Schünemann H Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2013; 107(9-10):638-45. PubMed ID: 24315335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]