These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25253167)

  • 1. Natural scene recognition with increasing time-on-task: the role of typicality and global image properties.
    Csathó Á; van der Linden D; Gács B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(4):814-28. PubMed ID: 25253167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scene categorization at large visual eccentricities.
    Boucart M; Moroni C; Thibaut M; Szaffarczyk S; Greene M
    Vision Res; 2013 Jun; 86():35-42. PubMed ID: 23597581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Residual abilities in age-related macular degeneration to process spatial frequencies during natural scene categorization.
    Musel B; Hera R; Chokron S; Alleysson D; Chiquet C; Romanet JP; Guyader N; Peyrin C
    Vis Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 28(6):529-41. PubMed ID: 22192508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Observers are consistent when rating image conspicuity.
    Cerf M; Cleary DR; Peters RJ; Einhäuser W; Koch C
    Vision Res; 2007 Nov; 47(24):3052-60. PubMed ID: 17923144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-level aftereffects to global scene properties.
    Greene MR; Oliva A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1430-42. PubMed ID: 20731502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coarse-to-fine categorization of visual scenes in scene-selective cortex.
    Musel B; Kauffmann L; Ramanoël S; Giavarini C; Guyader N; Chauvin A; Peyrin C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 26(10):2287-97. PubMed ID: 24738768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of gist in scene recognition.
    Sampanes AC; Tseng P; Bridgeman B
    Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(21):2275-83. PubMed ID: 18692519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence for participation by object-selective visual cortex in scene category judgments.
    Linsley D; MacEvoy SP
    J Vis; 2014 Aug; 14(9):. PubMed ID: 25146577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Building the gist of a scene: the role of global image features in recognition.
    Oliva A; Torralba A
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 155():23-36. PubMed ID: 17027377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transcranial magnetic stimulation to the transverse occipital sulcus affects scene but not object processing.
    Ganaden RE; Mullin CR; Steeves JK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Jun; 25(6):961-8. PubMed ID: 23410031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interaction of top-down and bottom-up processing in the fast visual analysis of natural scenes.
    Delorme A; Rousselet GA; Macé MJ; Fabre-Thorpe M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Apr; 19(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 15019707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of higher order image statistics in masking scene gist recognition.
    Loschky LC; Hansen BC; Sethi A; Pydimarri TN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):427-44. PubMed ID: 20139457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A perceptual paradigm and psychophysical evidence for hierarchy in scene gist processing.
    Kadar I; Ben-Shahar O
    J Vis; 2012 Dec; 12(13):. PubMed ID: 23255732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. TMS to the lateral occipital cortex disrupts object processing but facilitates scene processing.
    Mullin CR; Steeves JK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 23(12):4174-84. PubMed ID: 21812554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differential processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in young and older healthy adults: implications for pathology.
    Lux S; Marshall JC; Thimm M; Fink GR
    Cortex; 2008 Jan; 44(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 18387528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Object recognition in congruent and incongruent natural scenes: a life-span study.
    Rémy F; Saint-Aubert L; Bacon-Macé N; Vayssière N; Barbeau E; Fabre-Thorpe M
    Vision Res; 2013 Oct; 91():36-44. PubMed ID: 23891714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does object view influence the scene consistency effect?
    Sastyin G; Niimi R; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):856-66. PubMed ID: 25522833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Configural processing and face viewpoint.
    McKone E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):310-27. PubMed ID: 18377173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural correlates of spatial frequency processing: A neuropsychological approach.
    Peyrin C; Chokron S; Guyader N; Gout O; Moret J; Marendaz C
    Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1073-1074():1-10. PubMed ID: 16443206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The mere exposure effect and recognition depend on the way you look!
    Willems S; Dedonder J; Van der Linden M
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 20178929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.