178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25253443)
1. The effect of a supplementary ('Gist-based') information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial.
Smith SG; Raine R; Obichere A; Wolf MS; Wardle J; von Wagner C
J Behav Med; 2015 Apr; 38(2):261-72. PubMed ID: 25253443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The development and testing of a brief ('gist-based') supplementary colorectal cancer screening information leaflet.
Smith SG; Wolf MS; Obichere A; Raine R; Wardle J; von Wagner C
Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Dec; 93(3):619-25. PubMed ID: 24007765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How do people interpret information about colorectal cancer screening: observations from a think-aloud study.
Smith SG; Vart G; Wolf MS; Obichere A; Baker HJ; Raine R; Wardle J; von Wagner C
Health Expect; 2015 Oct; 18(5):703-14. PubMed ID: 23910930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reducing the socioeconomic gradient in uptake of the NHS bowel cancer screening Programme using a simplified supplementary information leaflet: a cluster-randomised trial.
Smith SG; Wardle J; Atkin W; Raine R; McGregor LM; Vart G; Morris S; Duffy SW; Moss S; Hackshaw A; Halloran S; Kralj-Hans I; Howe R; Snowball J; Handley G; Logan RF; Rainbow S; Smith S; Thomas M; Counsell N; von Wagner C
BMC Cancer; 2017 Aug; 17(1):543. PubMed ID: 28806955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of supplementary narrative-based information on colorectal cancer screening beliefs and intention.
McGregor LM; von Wagner C; Vart G; Yuen WC; Raine R; Wardle J; Robb KA
BMC Cancer; 2015 Mar; 15():162. PubMed ID: 25884168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A lack of information engagement among colorectal cancer screening non-attenders: cross-sectional survey.
Kobayashi LC; Waller J; von Wagner C; Wardle J
BMC Public Health; 2016 Jul; 16():659. PubMed ID: 27473593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The associations between objective numeracy and colorectal cancer screening knowledge, attitudes and defensive processing in a deprived community sample.
Smith SG; Kobayashi LC; Wolf MS; Raine R; Wardle J; von Wagner C
J Health Psychol; 2016 Aug; 21(8):1665-75. PubMed ID: 25512199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intentions in relation to the early detection of colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom.
McCaffery K; Wardle J; Waller J
Prev Med; 2003 May; 36(5):525-35. PubMed ID: 12689797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Active engagement in a web-based tutorial to prevent obesity grounded in Fuzzy-Trace Theory predicts higher knowledge and gist comprehension.
Brust-Renck PG; Reyna VF; Wilhelms EA; Wolfe CR; Widmer CL; Cedillos-Whynott EM; Morant AK
Behav Res Methods; 2017 Aug; 49(4):1386-1398. PubMed ID: 27531360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of a web-based intelligent tutoring system for communicating genetic risk of breast cancer: a fuzzy-trace theory approach.
Wolfe CR; Reyna VF; Widmer CL; Cedillos EM; Fisher CR; Brust-Renck PG; Weil AM
Med Decis Making; 2015 Jan; 35(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 24829276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Colorectal cancer screening: Associations between information provision, attitudes and intended participation.
Brandhof SD; Fagerlin A; Hawley S; Toes-Zoutendijk E; Trevena L; McCaffery K; Korfage IJ
Patient Educ Couns; 2018 Mar; 101(3):546-550. PubMed ID: 28899711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Individual differences in numerical representations of risk in health decision making: A fuzzy-trace theory approach.
Brust-Renck PG; Reyna VF
Risk Anal; 2023 Mar; 43(3):548-557. PubMed ID: 35297070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A theoretical framework for measuring knowledge in screening decision aid trials.
Smith SK; Barratt A; Trevena L; Simpson JM; Jansen J; McCaffery KJ
Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Nov; 89(2):330-6. PubMed ID: 22871477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Continuing cancer screening later in life: attitudes and intentions among older adults in England.
von Wagner C; Macedo A; Campbell C; Simon AE; Wardle J; Hammersley V; Weller D; Waller J
Age Ageing; 2013 Nov; 42(6):770-5. PubMed ID: 23999536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Knowledge of oral cancer, distress and screening intentions: longer term effects of a patient information leaflet.
Boundouki G; Humphris G; Field A
Patient Educ Couns; 2004 Apr; 53(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 15062907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of a decision aid about stratified ovarian cancer risk-management on women's knowledge and intentions: a randomised online experimental survey study.
Meisel SF; Freeman M; Waller J; Fraser L; Gessler S; Jacobs I; Kalsi J; Manchanda R; Rahman B; Side L; Wardle J; Lanceley A; Sanderson SC;
BMC Public Health; 2017 Nov; 17(1):882. PubMed ID: 29145813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The immediate effect on knowledge, attitudes and intentions in primary care attenders of a patient information leaflet: a randomized control trial replication and extension.
Humphris GM; Field EA
Br Dent J; 2003 Jun; 194(12):683-8; discussion 675. PubMed ID: 12830193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Colorectal cancer knowledge is not associated with screening compliance or intention.
Weinberg DS; Miller S; Rodoletz M; Egleston B; Fleisher L; Buzaglo J; Keenan E; Marks J; Bieber E
J Cancer Educ; 2009; 24(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 19526412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors associated with intentions to adhere to colorectal cancer screening follow-up exams.
Zheng YF; Saito T; Takahashi M; Ishibashi T; Kai I
BMC Public Health; 2006 Nov; 6():272. PubMed ID: 17083746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of including quantitative information in a decision aid for colorectal cancer screening: A randomized controlled trial.
Schwartz PH; Imperiale TF; Perkins SM; Schmidt KK; Althouse S; Rawl SM
Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Apr; 102(4):726-734. PubMed ID: 30578103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
