174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25253716)
1. Clonal growth: invasion or stability? A comparative study of clonal architecture and diversity in native and introduced lineages of Phragmites australis (Poaceae).
Douhovnikoff V; Hazelton EL
Am J Bot; 2014 Sep; 101(9):1577-84. PubMed ID: 25253716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-distance dispersal and high genetic diversity are implicated in the invasive spread of the common reed, Phragmites australis (Poaceae), in northeastern North America.
Kirk H; Paul J; Straka J; Freeland JR
Am J Bot; 2011 Jul; 98(7):1180-90. PubMed ID: 21712417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence for natural hybridization between native and introduced lineages of Phragmites australis in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.
Wu CA; Murray LA; Heffernan KE
Am J Bot; 2015 May; 102(5):805-12. PubMed ID: 26022492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Confirmed field hybridization of native and introduced Phragmites australis (Poaceae) in North America.
Saltonstall K; Castillo HE; Blossey B
Am J Bot; 2014 Jan; 101(1):211-5. PubMed ID: 24401327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does hybrid Phragmites australis differ from native and introduced lineages in reproductive, genetic, and morphological traits?
Williams J; Lambert AM; Long R; Saltonstall K
Am J Bot; 2019 Jan; 106(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 30633812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Invasion of Old World Phragmites australis in the New World: precipitation and temperature patterns combined with human influences redesign the invasive niche.
Guo WY; Lambertini C; Li XZ; Meyerson LA; Brix H
Glob Chang Biol; 2013 Nov; 19(11):3406-22. PubMed ID: 23765641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic diversity of native and introduced Phragmites (common reed) in Wisconsin.
Tippery NP; Pesch JD; Murphy BJ; Bautzmann RL
Genetica; 2020 Aug; 148(3-4):165-172. PubMed ID: 32749631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microsatellite variation within and among North American lineages of Phragmites australis.
Saltonstall K
Mol Ecol; 2003 Jul; 12(7):1689-702. PubMed ID: 12803624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Geographic variation in apparent competition between native and invasive Phragmites australis.
Bhattarai GP; Meyerson LA; Cronin JT
Ecology; 2017 Feb; 98(2):349-358. PubMed ID: 27861789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can nutrient enrichment influence the invasion of Phragmites australis?
Uddin MN; Robinson RW
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Feb; 613-614():1449-1459. PubMed ID: 28648370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genotypic diversity enhances invasive ability of Spartina alterniflora.
Wang XY; Shen DW; Jiao J; Xu NN; Yu S; Zhou XF; Shi MM; Chen XY
Mol Ecol; 2012 May; 21(10):2542-51. PubMed ID: 22413802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phylogeographic analyses and genetic structure illustrate the complex evolutionary history of Phragmites australis in Mexico.
Colin R; Eguiarte LE
Am J Bot; 2016 May; 103(5):876-87. PubMed ID: 27208356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Novel genome characteristics contribute to the invasiveness of Phragmites australis (common reed).
Oh DH; Kowalski KP; Quach QN; Wijesinghege C; Tanford P; Dassanayake M; Clay K
Mol Ecol; 2022 Feb; 31(4):1142-1159. PubMed ID: 34839548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Jack-and-master trait responses to elevated CO2 and N: a comparison of native and introduced Phragmites australis.
Mozdzer TJ; Megonigal JP
PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e42794. PubMed ID: 23118844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impacts of Phragmites australis Invasion on Soil Enzyme Activities and Microbial Abundance of Tidal Marshes.
Kim S; Kang J; Megonigal JP; Kang H; Seo J; Ding W
Microb Ecol; 2018 Oct; 76(3):782-790. PubMed ID: 29536132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vegetation recovery in an oil-impacted and burned Phragmites australis tidal freshwater marsh.
Zengel S; Weaver J; Wilder SL; Dauzat J; Sanfilippo C; Miles MS; Jellison K; Doelling P; Davis A; Fortier BK; Harris J; Panaccione J; Wall S; Nixon Z
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jan; 612():231-237. PubMed ID: 28850842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrasting nutrient stocks and litter decomposition in stands of native and invasive species in a sub-tropical estuarine marsh.
Tong C; Zhang L; Wang W; Gauci V; Marrs R; Liu B; Jia R; Zeng C
Environ Res; 2011 Oct; 111(7):909-16. PubMed ID: 21704985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clonal structure of Elytrigia atherica along different successional stages of a salt marsh.
Scheepens JF; Veeneklaas RM; Van De Zande L; Bakker JP
Mol Ecol; 2007 Mar; 16(5):1115-24. PubMed ID: 17305865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maximal stomatal conductance to water and plasticity in stomatal traits differ between native and invasive introduced lineages of Phragmites australis in North America.
Douhovnikoff V; Taylor SH; Hazelton EL; Smith CM; O'Brien J
AoB Plants; 2016 Jan; 8():. PubMed ID: 26819257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Density-dependent role of an invasive marsh grass, Phragmites australis, on ecosystem service provision.
Theuerkauf SJ; Puckett BJ; Theuerkauf KW; Theuerkauf EJ; Eggleston DB
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0173007. PubMed ID: 28235024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
