409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25253826)
1. Diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography of the breast according to scanning orientation.
Kim S; Choi S; Choi Y; Kook SH; Park HJ; Chung EC
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Oct; 33(10):1797-804. PubMed ID: 25253826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study.
Seo M; Ahn HS; Park SH; Lee JB; Choi BI; Sohn YM; Shin SY
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 28688156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Chang JM; Won JK; Lee KB; Park IA; Yi A; Moon WK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):W347-56. PubMed ID: 23883252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic features of quantitative comb-push shear elastography for breast lesion differentiation.
Bayat M; Denis M; Gregory A; Mehrmohammadi M; Kumar V; Meixner D; Fazzio RT; Fatemi M; Alizad A
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0172801. PubMed ID: 28257467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Performance of Multimodal Sound Touch Elastography for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses.
Dong F; Wu H; Zhang L; Tian H; Liang W; Ye X; Liu Y; Xu J
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Aug; 38(8):2181-2190. PubMed ID: 30593673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A set of shear wave elastography quantitative parameters combined with ultrasound BI-RADS to assess benign and malignant breast lesions.
Shi XQ; Li JL; Wan WB; Huang Y
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):960-6. PubMed ID: 25701532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A qualitative and quantitative assessment of simultaneous strain, shear wave, and point shear wave elastography to distinguish malignant and benign breast lesions.
Altıntas Y; Bayrak M; Alabaz Ö; Celiktas M
Acta Radiol; 2021 Sep; 62(9):1155-1162. PubMed ID: 33070635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses.
Lee JH; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ
Acad Radiol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 21115376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: a comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography.
Chung SY; Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Jang M; Kim KG
Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 19929254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-aided diagnosis based on quantitative elastographic features with supersonic shear wave imaging.
Xiao Y; Zeng J; Niu L; Zeng Q; Wu T; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 24268454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative evaluation of peripheral tissue elasticity for ultrasound-detected breast lesions.
Xiao Y; Yu Y; Niu L; Qian M; Deng Z; Qiu W; Zheng H
Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):896-904. PubMed ID: 27349474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can measuring perilesional tissue stiffness and stiff rim sign improve the diagnostic performance between benign and malignant breast lesions?
Kong WT; Wang Y; Zhou WJ; Zhang YD; Wang WP; Zhuang XM; Wu M
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2021 Jan; 48(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 33439373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of shear wave elastography to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions.
Çebi Olgun D; Korkmazer B; Kılıç F; Dikici AS; Velidedeoğlu M; Aydoğan F; Kantarcı F; Yılmaz MH
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2014; 20(3):239-44. PubMed ID: 24509183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Shear-Wave Elastography: Could it be Helpful for the Diagnosis of Non-Mass-Like Breast Lesions?
Wang ZL; Li Y; Wan WB; Li N; Tang J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 43(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 27717515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Added value of Virtual Touch IQ shear wave elastography in the ultrasound assessment of breast lesions.
Ianculescu V; Ciolovan LM; Dunant A; Vielh P; Mazouni C; Delaloge S; Dromain C; Blidaru A; Balleyguier C
Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):773-7. PubMed ID: 24602803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shear Wave Elastography for Surgically Verified Breast Papillary Lesions: Is It Effective for Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Lesions?
Choi HJ; Ko KH; Jung HK
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Oct; 36(10):2007-2014. PubMed ID: 28708299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio.
Stachs A; Hartmann S; Stubert J; Dieterich M; Martin A; Kundt G; Reimer T; Gerber B
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 23108926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses.
Evans A; Whelehan P; Thomson K; McLean D; Brauer K; Purdie C; Jordan L; Baker L; Thompson A
Breast Cancer Res; 2010; 12(6):R104. PubMed ID: 21122101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
