These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25254191)

  • 21. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bond strength of overdenture locator posts cemented with seven luting agents.
    Aleisa K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):675-80. PubMed ID: 24309348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Factors influencing the removal of posts.
    Hauman CH; Chandler NP; Purton DG
    Int Endod J; 2003 Oct; 36(10):687-90. PubMed ID: 14511226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In vitro retention of prefabricated and individually formed posts: A pilot study.
    Amižić IP; Miletić I; Baraba A; Fan Y; Nathanson D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):553-557. PubMed ID: 29961614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of eugenol-containing and resin endodontic sealers on retention of prefabricated metal posts cemented with zinc phosphate and resin cements.
    Farid F; Mahgoli H; Hosseini A; Chiniforush N
    J Prosthodont Res; 2013 Oct; 57(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 24095644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The in vitro effect of pulpal pressure and luting agent on tensile bond strength of complete cast crowns.
    Ozturk AN; Belli S; Eskitascioglu G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Mar; 91(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 15060495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of Adaptation and Adhesion on the Retention of Computer-aided Design/Computer-aided Manufacturing Glass Fiber Posts to Root Canal.
    Eid R; Azzam K; Skienhe H; Ounsi H; Ferrari M; Salameh Z
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Sep; 20(9):1003-1008. PubMed ID: 31797819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In vitro evaluation of the effect of different endodontic sealers on retentive strength of fiber posts.
    AlEisa K; Al-Dwairi ZN; Lynch E; Lynch CD
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(5):539-44. PubMed ID: 23557444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The measurement and comparison of shear fracture strength and shear bond strength between carbon fiber post and some other posts].
    Zhang XH; Tong D; Wang XZ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Sep; 38(5):339-41. PubMed ID: 14680579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diametral tensile strength of a resin composite core with nonmetallic prefabricated posts: an in vitro study.
    Coelho Santos G; El-Mowafy O; Rubo JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 15116034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of the retention of tooth-colored posts.
    Qualtrough AJ; Chandler NP; Purton DG
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Mar; 34(3):199-201. PubMed ID: 12731601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative evaluation of the regional micro-push-out bond strength of custom-made resin post system with a prefabricated resin post: an in vitro study.
    Ranjithkumar S; Velmurugan N; Roy A; Hemamalathi S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):484-9. PubMed ID: 23257482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber reinforced posts and cast gold post and cores cemented with three cements.
    Torres-Sánchez C; Montoya-Salazar V; Córdoba P; Vélez C; Guzmán-Duran A; Gutierrez-Pérez JL; Torres-Lagares D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 23929374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts.
    Balbosh A; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 16543019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative evaluation of the effect of surface treatment of fiber-reinforced posts and prefabricated metal posts on adhesion of a resin-based luting cement: An
    Ruttonji ZR; Kusugal PB; Nayak A; Mahajan D; Sushma KM; Patil VN
    J Conserv Dent; 2019; 22(3):245-248. PubMed ID: 31367107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of touch-cure polymerization on the push-out bond strength of fiber posts.
    Jamel RS; Farhan Alkhalidi E; Edrees Dawood A
    Saudi Dent J; 2024 Apr; 36(4):627-632. PubMed ID: 38690389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of the fracture resistance of core materials using different types of posts.
    Coltak KM; Yanikoğlu ND; Bayindir F
    Quintessence Int; 2007 Sep; 38(8):e511-6. PubMed ID: 17823676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Retention of cast posts cemented with zinc phosphate cement using different cementing techniques.
    Fakiha Z; Al-Aujan A; Al-Shamrani S
    J Prosthodont; 2001 Mar; 10(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 11406794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical evaluation of carbon fiber reinforced carbon endodontic post, glass fiber reinforced post with cast post and core: A one year comparative clinical study.
    Preethi G; Kala M
    J Conserv Dent; 2008 Oct; 11(4):162-7. PubMed ID: 20351975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of Different Post Systems for Fracture Resistance: An in vitro Study.
    Vadavadagi SV; Dhananjaya KM; Yadahalli RP; Lahari M; Shetty SR; Bhavana BL
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Mar; 18(3):205-208. PubMed ID: 28258265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.