BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25254609)

  • 1. Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination.
    Esteves SC
    Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(4):443-53. PubMed ID: 25254609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of the new 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen analyses on male infertility.
    Murray KS; James A; McGeady JB; Reed ML; Kuang WW; Nangia AK
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Dec; 98(6):1428-31. PubMed ID: 22921910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Critical appraisal of World Health Organization's new reference values for human semen characteristics and effect on diagnosis and treatment of subfertile men.
    Esteves SC; Zini A; Aziz N; Alvarez JG; Sabanegh ES; Agarwal A
    Urology; 2012 Jan; 79(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 22070891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. National semen analysis reference range reporting: adherence to the 1999 World Health Organization guidelines 10 years later.
    Penn HA; Windsperger A; Smith Z; Parekattil SJ; Kuang WW; Kolettis PN; Nangia AK
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(7):2320-3. PubMed ID: 21457971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. RE: Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination.
    Cocuzza M
    Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(1):181-3. PubMed ID: 25928527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics.
    Cooper TG; Noonan E; von Eckardstein S; Auger J; Baker HW; Behre HM; Haugen TB; Kruger T; Wang C; Mbizvo MT; Vogelsong KM
    Hum Reprod Update; 2010; 16(3):231-45. PubMed ID: 19934213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of semen parameters in male referrals: impact of reference limits, stratification by fertility categories, predictors of change, and comparison of normal semen parameters in subfertile couples.
    Baker K; Li J; Sabanegh E
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Jan; 103(1):59-65.e5. PubMed ID: 25450301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical implications of the new 2010 WHO reference ranges for human semen characteristics.
    Yerram N; Sandlow JI; Brannigan RE
    J Androl; 2012; 33(3):289-90. PubMed ID: 21799140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What is normal semen quality? On the use and abuse of reference limits for the interpretation of semen analysis results.
    Björndahl L
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2011 Sep; 14(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 21770820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New World Health Organization reference values for semen analysis: where do we stand?
    Vieira M
    Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2013; 11(2):263-4. PubMed ID: 23843074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re: the effect of the new 2010 world health organization criteria for semen analyses on male infertility.
    Niederberger C
    J Urol; 2013 Aug; 190(2):648. PubMed ID: 23845369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Semen analysis: spermiogram according to WHO criteria].
    Kliesch S; Cooper TG
    Urologe A; 2008 Dec; 47(12):1548, 1550-4. PubMed ID: 18953523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Afterword to Semen Analysis in 21st Century Medicine special issue in Asian Journal of Andrology.
    Handelsman DJ; Cooper TG
    Asian J Androl; 2010 Jan; 12(1):118-23. PubMed ID: 20111092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semen analysis from an epidemiologic perspective.
    Ellekilde Bonde JP
    Asian J Androl; 2010 Jan; 12(1):91-4. PubMed ID: 20111087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of male infertility: is the 2010 WHO reference range helpful or confusing?
    Centola GM
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Dec; 98(6):1416-7. PubMed ID: 22925685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New WHO-reference limits-revolution or storm in a teapot?
    Haidl G
    Asian J Androl; 2011 Mar; 13(2):208-11. PubMed ID: 21170075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpretation of semen analysis using WHO 1999 and WHO 2010 reference values: Abnormal becoming normal.
    Alshahrani S; Aldossari K; Al-Zahrani J; Gabr AH; Henkel R; Ahmad G
    Andrologia; 2018 Mar; 50(2):. PubMed ID: 28771785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. WHO reference values for human semen.
    Tocci A; Lucchini C
    Hum Reprod Update; 2010; 16(5):559; author reply 559. PubMed ID: 20542895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Redefining abnormal follicle-stimulating hormone in the male infertility population.
    Gordetsky J; van Wijngaarden E; O'Brien J
    BJU Int; 2012 Aug; 110(4):568-72. PubMed ID: 22177092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolution of the World Health Organization semen analysis manual: where are we?
    Esteves SC
    Nat Rev Urol; 2022 Jul; 19(7):439-446. PubMed ID: 35523961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.