These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25255646)

  • 1. [Decline of speech understanding in the hearing impaired elderly listeners who visited our hearing aid clinic].
    Yasue M; Sugiura S; Uchida Y; Nakashima T
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2014 Aug; 117(8):1080-6. PubMed ID: 25255646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Influence of hearing aids on monosyllabic test score and subjective everyday hearing].
    Thümmler R; Liebscher T; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):595-600. PubMed ID: 27126291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benefits of amplification for unaided speech discrimination in age-related hearing loss with flat type audiogram.
    Ito A; Fukuda S; Shimozawa M; Abe K; Kumada J; Nakaya M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2023 Feb; 50(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 35643884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech Perception and Information-Carrying Capacity for Hearing Aid Users of Different Ages.
    Hoppe U; Hocke T; Müller A; Hast A
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21 Suppl 1():16-20. PubMed ID: 27806356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The age effect in evaluation of hearing aid benefits by speech audiometry].
    Müller A; Hocke T; Hoppe U; Mir-Salim P
    HNO; 2016 Mar; 64(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 26801889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing.
    Blamey PJ; Sarant JZ; Paatsch LE; Barry JG; Bow CP; Wales RJ; Wright M; Psarros C; Rattigan K; Tooher R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Apr; 44(2):264-85. PubMed ID: 11324650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Maximum monosyllabic score as a predictor for cochlear implant outcome].
    Hoppe U; Hocke T; Hast A; Iro H
    HNO; 2019 Mar; 67(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 30635677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confidence Limits of Word Identification Scores Derived Using Nonlinear Quantile Regression.
    Narne VK; Möller S; Wolff A; Houmøller SS; Loquet G; Hammershøi D; Schmidt JH
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():2331216520983110. PubMed ID: 33487139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between pure-tone audiogram findings and speech perception among older Japanese persons.
    Maeda Y; Takao S; Sugaya A; Kataoka Y; Kariya S; Tanaka S; Nagayasu R; Nakagawa A; Nishizaki K
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 138(2):140-144. PubMed ID: 28933573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Speech recognition with hearing aids for 10 standard audiograms].
    Dörfler C; Hocke T; Hast A; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2020 Jan; 68(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 31728573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maximum preimplantation monosyllabic score as predictor of cochlear implant outcome.
    Hoppe U; Hocke T; Hast A; Iro H
    HNO; 2019 Jun; 67(Suppl 2):62-68. PubMed ID: 30944946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of extreme adaptive frequency compression in bimodal listeners on sound localization and speech perception.
    Veugen LCE; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; van Opstal AJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Sep; 18(5):266-277. PubMed ID: 28726592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech recognition with hearing aids for 10 standard audiograms : English version.
    Dörfler C; Hocke T; Hast A; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2020 Aug; 68(Suppl 2):93-99. PubMed ID: 32211930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hearing with the bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA, HC 200) compared to a conventional bone-conduction hearing aid.
    Cremers CW; Snik FM; Beynon AJ
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1992 Jun; 17(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 1505098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual acclimatization post nonlinear frequency compression hearing aid fitting in older children.
    Glista D; Scollie S; Sulkers J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1765-87. PubMed ID: 22615475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of tone-vocoding on spatial release from masking for old, hearing-impaired listeners.
    King A; Hopkins K; Plack CJ; Pontoppidan NH; Bramsløw L; Hietkamp RK; Vatti M; Hafez A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2591. PubMed ID: 28464637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Amos NE; Humes LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.