These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Psychophysical evidence for a shared representational medium for mental images and percepts. Farah MJ J Exp Psychol Gen; 1985 Mar; 114(1):91-103. PubMed ID: 3156947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imagery-induced interference on a visual detection task. Craver-Lemley C; Arterberry ME Spat Vis; 2001 Jun; 14(2):101-19. PubMed ID: 11450798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mental imagery acuity in the peripheral visual field. Finke RA; Kosslyn SM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1980 Feb; 6(1):126-39. PubMed ID: 6444986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reconstructing imagined letters from early visual cortex reveals tight topographic correspondence between visual mental imagery and perception. Senden M; Emmerling TC; van Hoof R; Frost MA; Goebel R Brain Struct Funct; 2019 Apr; 224(3):1167-1183. PubMed ID: 30637491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Effect of task difficulty on hemispheric differences in visual image processing]. Hildebrandt H; Fresenborg I; Engel A Z Exp Psychol; 1995; 42(2):256-79. PubMed ID: 7497072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Area and contrast effects upon perceptual and imagery acuity. Finke RA; Kurtzman HS J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Aug; 7(4):825-32. PubMed ID: 6457094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mistaking imagination for reality: Congruent mental imagery leads to more liberal perceptual detection. Dijkstra N; Mazor M; Kok P; Fleming S Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104719. PubMed ID: 33878636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Imagery-perception interaction depends on the shape of the image: a reply to Farah (1989). Heil M; Rösler F; Hennighausen E J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Dec; 19(6):1313-20. PubMed ID: 8294894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image generation and processing of generated images in the cerebral hemispheres. Sergent J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Feb; 15(1):170-8. PubMed ID: 2522527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differential effects of concurrent letters on visual field differences in letter recognition. Hatta T Int J Neurosci; 1982 Sep; 17(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7166476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differences in vividness ratings of perceived and imagined patterns. Giusberti F; Cornoldi C; De Beni R; Massironi M Br J Psychol; 1992 Nov; 83 ( Pt 4)():533-47. PubMed ID: 1486364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differential temporal dynamics during visual imagery and perception. Dijkstra N; Mostert P; Lange FP; Bosch S; van Gerven MA Elife; 2018 May; 7():. PubMed ID: 29807570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Controllability of motor imagery and transformation of visual imagery. Naito E Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Apr; 78(2):479-87. PubMed ID: 8022675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The laterality of mental image generation: a test with normal subjects. Farah MJ Neuropsychologia; 1986; 24(4):541-51. PubMed ID: 3774139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two types of image generation: evidence for left and right hemisphere processes. Kosslyn SM; Maljkovic V; Hamilton SE; Horwitz G; Thompson WL Neuropsychologia; 1995 Nov; 33(11):1485-510. PubMed ID: 8584182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]