158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2525604)
1. Understanding collision dynamics.
Gilden DL; Proffitt DR
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 May; 15(2):372-83. PubMed ID: 2525604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Understanding natural dynamics.
Proffitt DR; Gilden DL
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 May; 15(2):384-93. PubMed ID: 2525605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perception of forces exerted by objects in collision events.
White PA
Psychol Rev; 2009 Jul; 116(3):580-601. PubMed ID: 19618988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Duration, distance, and speed judgments of two moving objects by 4- to 11-year olds.
Matsuda F
J Exp Child Psychol; 1996 Nov; 63(2):286-311. PubMed ID: 8923748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual information about moving objects.
Todd JT
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Aug; 7(4):975-810. PubMed ID: 6457104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploring mass perception with Markov chain Monte Carlo.
Cohen AL; Ross MG
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1833-44. PubMed ID: 19968439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Make the first move: how infants learn about self-propelled objects.
Rakison DH
Dev Psychol; 2006 Sep; 42(5):900-12. PubMed ID: 16953695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of velocity on judgments of relative mass.
Flynn SB
Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Dec; 81(3 Pt 1):979-87. PubMed ID: 8668462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The relationship between object files and conscious perception.
Mitroff SR; Scholl BJ; Wynn K
Cognition; 2005 May; 96(1):67-92. PubMed ID: 15833307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A theory of dynamic occluded and illusory object perception.
Palmer EM; Kellman PJ; Shipley TF
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):513-41. PubMed ID: 17087570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gravitational acceleration as a cue for absolute size and distance?
Hecht H; Kaiser MK; Banks MS
Percept Psychophys; 1996 Oct; 58(7):1066-75. PubMed ID: 8920842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contributions of invariants, heuristics, and exemplars to the visual perception of relative mass.
Cohen AL
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):574-98. PubMed ID: 16822125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Apparent relative size and depth of moving objects.
Kaneko H; Uchikawa K
Perception; 1993; 22(5):537-47. PubMed ID: 8414880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What counts as by? Young children's use of relative distance to judge nearbyness.
Hund AM; Plumert JM
Dev Psychol; 2007 Jan; 43(1):121-33. PubMed ID: 17201513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Going, going, gone: localizing abrupt offsets of moving objects.
Maus GW; Nijhawan R
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):611-26. PubMed ID: 19485681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distance estimation in vista space.
Daum SO; Hecht H
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1127-37. PubMed ID: 19525542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Learning to perceive the relative mass of colliding balls: the effects of ratio scaling and feedback.
Jacobs DM; Michaels CF; Runeson S
Percept Psychophys; 2000 Oct; 62(7):1332-40. PubMed ID: 11143445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Misconceptions about motion: development and training effects.
Levin I; Siegler RS; Druyan S
Child Dev; 1990 Oct; 61(5):1544-57. PubMed ID: 2245745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Judgments of synchrony between auditory and moving or still visual stimuli.
Fouriezos G; Capstick G; Monette F; Bellemare C; Parkinson M; Dumoulin A
Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):277-92. PubMed ID: 18266504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Galileo bias: a naive conceptual belief that influences people's perceptions and performance in a ball-dropping task.
Oberle CD; McBeath MK; Madigan SC; Sugar TG
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):643-53. PubMed ID: 16060770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
