These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25257543)
1. DNA extraction protocols cause differences in 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing efficiency but not in community profile composition or structure. Rubin BE; Sanders JG; Hampton-Marcell J; Owens SM; Gilbert JA; Moreau CS Microbiologyopen; 2014 Dec; 3(6):910-21. PubMed ID: 25257543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementing high-throughput insect barcoding in microbiome studies: impact of non-destructive DNA extraction on microbiome reconstruction. Andriienko V; Buczek M; Meier R; Srivathsan A; Łukasik P; Kolasa MR PeerJ; 2024; 12():e18025. PubMed ID: 39329134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of DNA extraction methods on 16S rRNA-based profiling of bacterial communities in cheese. Markusková B; Minarovičová J; Véghová A; Drahovská H; Kaclíková E J Microbiol Methods; 2021 May; 184():106210. PubMed ID: 33774112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform. Fouhy F; Clooney AG; Stanton C; Claesson MJ; Cotter PD BMC Microbiol; 2016 Jun; 16(1):123. PubMed ID: 27342980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The truth about metagenomics: quantifying and counteracting bias in 16S rRNA studies. Brooks JP; Edwards DJ; Harwich MD; Rivera MC; Fettweis JM; Serrano MG; Reris RA; Sheth NU; Huang B; Girerd P; ; Strauss JF; Jefferson KK; Buck GA BMC Microbiol; 2015 Mar; 15():66. PubMed ID: 25880246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved DNA Extraction and Amplification Strategy for 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon-Based Microbiome Studies. Hong BY; Driscoll M; Gratalo D; Jarvie T; Weinstock GM Int J Mol Sci; 2024 Mar; 25(5):. PubMed ID: 38474213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Host DNA depletion efficiency of microbiome DNA enrichment methods in infected tissue samples. Heravi FS; Zakrzewski M; Vickery K; Hu H J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Mar; 170():105856. PubMed ID: 32007505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform. Castelino M; Eyre S; Moat J; Fox G; Martin P; Ho P; Upton M; Barton A BMC Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28109256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sediment-associated microbial community profiling: sample pre-processing through sequential membrane filtration for 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Serrana JM; Watanabe K BMC Microbiol; 2022 Jan; 22(1):33. PubMed ID: 35057747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are all faecal bacteria detected with equal efficiency? A study using next-generation sequencing and quantitative culture of infants' faecal samples. Sjöberg F; Nookaew I; Yazdanshenas S; Gio-Batta M; Adlerberth I; Wold AE J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Oct; 177():106018. PubMed ID: 32795633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of DNA extraction and sampling methods on bacterial communities monitored by 16S rDNA metabarcoding in cold-smoked salmon and processing plant surfaces. Maillet A; Bouju-Albert A; Roblin S; Vaissié P; Leuillet S; Dousset X; Jaffrès E; Combrisson J; Prévost H Food Microbiol; 2021 May; 95():103705. PubMed ID: 33397623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Refinement of 16S rRNA gene analysis for low biomass biospecimens. Villette R; Autaa G; Hind S; Holm JB; Moreno-Sabater A; Larsen M Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10741. PubMed ID: 34031485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative analysis of DNA extraction methods to study the body surface microbiota of insects: A case study with ant cuticular bacteria. Birer C; Tysklind N; Zinger L; Duplais C Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Nov; 17(6):e34-e45. PubMed ID: 28477337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of sequencing platforms and bioinformatics pipelines for compositional analysis of the gut microbiome. Allali I; Arnold JW; Roach J; Cadenas MB; Butz N; Hassan HM; Koci M; Ballou A; Mendoza M; Ali R; Azcarate-Peril MA BMC Microbiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):194. PubMed ID: 28903732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimization of DNA extraction for advancing coral microbiota investigations. Weber L; DeForce E; Apprill A Microbiome; 2017 Feb; 5(1):18. PubMed ID: 28179023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Managing Contamination and Diverse Bacterial Loads in 16S rRNA Deep Sequencing of Clinical Samples: Implications of the Law of Small Numbers. Dyrhovden R; Rippin M; Øvrebø KK; Nygaard RM; Ulvestad E; Kommedal Ø mBio; 2021 Jun; 12(3):e0059821. PubMed ID: 34101489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Biases on community structure during DNA extraction of shrimp intestinal microbiota revealed by high-throughput sequencing]. Wen C; He Y; Xue M; Liang H; Dong J Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2016 Jan; 56(1):130-42. PubMed ID: 27305787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of DNA extraction method, 16S rRNA targeted hypervariable regions, and sample origin on microbial diversity detected by 454 pyrosequencing in marine chemosynthetic ecosystems. Cruaud P; Vigneron A; Lucchetti-Miganeh C; Ciron PE; Godfroy A; Cambon-Bonavita MA Appl Environ Microbiol; 2014 Aug; 80(15):4626-39. PubMed ID: 24837380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bacterial diversity in Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis geminata ant colonies characterized by 16S amplicon 454 pyrosequencing. Ishak HD; Plowes R; Sen R; Kellner K; Meyer E; Estrada DA; Dowd SE; Mueller UG Microb Ecol; 2011 May; 61(4):821-31. PubMed ID: 21243351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]