These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

653 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25257661)

  • 1. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and SPECT/low-dose computerized tomography did not increase sensitivity or specificity compared to planar bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastases in advanced breast cancer.
    Haraldsen A; Bluhme H; Røhl L; Pedersen EM; Jensen AB; Hansen EB; Nellemann H; Rasmussen F; Morsing A
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2016 Jan; 36(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 25257661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastases in breast cancer.
    Hahn S; Heusner T; Kümmel S; Köninger A; Nagarajah J; Müller S; Boy C; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Stahl A
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Nov; 52(9):1009-14. PubMed ID: 21969709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Prospective Study Comparing
    Löfgren J; Mortensen J; Rasmussen SH; Madsen C; Loft A; Hansen AE; Oturai P; Jensen KE; Mørk ML; Reichkendler M; Højgaard L; Fischer BM
    J Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 58(11):1778-1785. PubMed ID: 28798033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incremental diagnostic utility of systematic double-bed SPECT/CT for bone scintigraphy in initial staging of cancer patients.
    Guezennec C; Keromnes N; Robin P; Abgral R; Bourhis D; Querellou S; de Laroche R; Le Duc-Pennec A; Salaün PY; Le Roux PY
    Cancer Imaging; 2017 Jun; 17(1):16. PubMed ID: 28592305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective evaluation of planar bone scintigraphy, SPECT, SPECT/CT, 18F-NaF PET/CT and whole body 1.5T MRI, including DWI, for the detection of bone metastases in high risk breast and prostate cancer patients: SKELETA clinical trial.
    Jambor I; Kuisma A; Ramadan S; Huovinen R; Sandell M; Kajander S; Kemppainen J; Kauppila E; Auren J; Merisaari H; Saunavaara J; Noponen T; Minn H; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M
    Acta Oncol; 2016; 55(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 25833330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Scintigraphy, Combined 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT, and Whole-Body MRI in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer.
    Minamimoto R; Loening A; Jamali M; Barkhodari A; Mosci C; Jackson T; Obara P; Taviani V; Gambhir SS; Vasanawala S; Iagaru A
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1862-8. PubMed ID: 26405167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI compared with (18)F-NaF PET/CT for detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate carcinoma.
    Mosavi F; Johansson S; Sandberg DT; Turesson I; Sörensen J; Ahlström H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Nov; 199(5):1114-20. PubMed ID: 23096187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nuclear Medicine Imaging Techniques for Detection of Skeletal Metastases in Breast Cancer.
    Iagaru A; Minamimoto R
    PET Clin; 2018 Jul; 13(3):383-393. PubMed ID: 30100077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: 99mTc-MDP Planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, 18F-fluoride PET, and 18F-fluoride PET/CT.
    Even-Sapir E; Metser U; Mishani E; Lievshitz G; Lerman H; Leibovitch I
    J Nucl Med; 2006 Feb; 47(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 16455635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Whole body bone SPET/CT can successfully replace the conventional bone scan in breast cancer patients. A prospective study of 257 patients.
    Mavriopoulou E; Zampakis P; Smpiliri E; Spyridonidis T; Rapti E; Haberkorn U; Makatsoris T; Apostolopoulos DJ
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2018; 21(2):125-133. PubMed ID: 30089314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective comparison of whole-body bone SPECT and sodium 18F-fluoride PET in the detection of bone metastases from breast cancer.
    Abikhzer G; Srour S; Fried G; Drumea K; Kozlener E; Frenkel A; Israel O; Fogelman I; Kagna O
    Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Nov; 37(11):1160-8. PubMed ID: 27536906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients.
    Bruckmann NM; Kirchner J; Umutlu L; Fendler WP; Seifert R; Herrmann K; Bittner AK; Hoffmann O; Mohrmann S; Antke C; Schimmöller L; Ingenwerth M; Breuckmann K; Stang A; Buchbender C; Antoch G; Sawicki LM
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8714-8724. PubMed ID: 33912991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spine metastases in prostate cancer: comparison of technetium-99m-MDP whole-body bone scintigraphy, [(18) F]choline positron emission tomography(PET)/computed tomography (CT) and [(18) F]NaF PET/CT.
    Poulsen MH; Petersen H; Høilund-Carlsen PF; Jakobsen JS; Gerke O; Karstoft J; Steffansen SI; Walter S
    BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6):818-23. PubMed ID: 24314065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients in the PET/CT era: Do we still need the bone scan?
    Caglar M; Kupik O; Karabulut E; Høilund-Carlsen PF
    Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2016; 35(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 26514321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "One-stop-shop" staging: should we prefer FDG-PET/CT or MRI for the detection of bone metastases?
    Heusner T; Gölitz P; Hamami M; Eberhardt W; Esser S; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jun; 78(3):430-5. PubMed ID: 19945240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective study evaluating the relative sensitivity of 18F-NaF PET/CT for detecting skeletal metastases from renal cell carcinoma in comparison to multidetector CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy, using an adaptive trial design.
    Gerety EL; Lawrence EM; Wason J; Yan H; Hilborne S; Buscombe J; Cheow HK; Shaw AS; Bird N; Fife K; Heard S; Lomas DJ; Matakidou A; Soloviev D; Eisen T; Gallagher FA
    Ann Oncol; 2015 Oct; 26(10):2113-8. PubMed ID: 26202597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective observational study on diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MRI in solid small round cell tumours.
    Kembhavi SA; Rangarajan V; Shah S; Qureshi S; Arora B; Juvekar S; Laskar S; Vora T; Chinnaswamy G; Ramadwar M; Kurkure P
    Clin Radiol; 2014 Sep; 69(9):900-8. PubMed ID: 24863003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 99 m-Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy and 18 F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of skeletal metastases.
    Chang CY; Gill CM; Joseph Simeone F; Taneja AK; Huang AJ; Torriani M; Bredella MA
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Jan; 57(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 25533313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the diagnostic and prognostic values of 99mTc-MDP-planar bone scintigraphy, 131I-SPECT/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases from differentiated thyroid cancer.
    Qiu ZL; Xue YL; Song HJ; Luo QY
    Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Dec; 33(12):1232-42. PubMed ID: 23111353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparison of Accuracy of Planar and Evolution SPECT/CT Bone Imaging in Differentiating Benign from Metastatic Bone Lesions.
    Teyateeti A; Tocharoenchai C; Muangsomboon K; Komoltri C; Pusuwan P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2017 Jan; 100(1):100-10. PubMed ID: 29911774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.