These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25257907)

  • 1. High-speed video or video stroboscopy in adolescents: which sheds more light?
    Shinghal T; Low A; Russell L; Propst EJ; Eskander A; Campisi P
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Dec; 151(6):1041-5. PubMed ID: 25257907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-speed laryngeal imaging compared with videostroboscopy in healthy subjects.
    Kendall KA
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Mar; 135(3):274-81. PubMed ID: 19289706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utility of Laryngeal High-speed Videoendoscopy in Clinical Voice Assessment.
    Zacharias SRC; Deliyski DD; Gerlach TT
    J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):216-220. PubMed ID: 28596101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The diagnostic role of high-speed vocal fold vibratory imaging.
    Mendelsohn AH; Remacle M; Courey MS; Gerhard F; Postma GN
    J Voice; 2013 Sep; 27(5):627-31. PubMed ID: 23911007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Flexible laryngoscopy: a comparison of fiber optic and distal chip technologies. Part 1: vocal fold masses.
    Eller R; Ginsburg M; Lurie D; Heman-Ackah Y; Lyons K; Sataloff R
    J Voice; 2008 Nov; 22(6):746-50. PubMed ID: 18207364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Real-time Simultaneous DKG and 2D DKG Using High-speed Digital Camera.
    Kang DH; Wang SG; Park HJ; Lee JC; Jeon GR; Choi IS; Kim SJ; Shin BJ
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):247.e1-247.e7. PubMed ID: 27839706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Voice-Vibratory Assessment With Laryngeal Imaging (VALI) Form: Reliability of Rating Stroboscopy and High-speed Videoendoscopy.
    Poburka BJ; Patel RR; Bless DM
    J Voice; 2017 Jul; 31(4):513.e1-513.e14. PubMed ID: 28040342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Videostroboscopy and High-speed Videoendoscopy in Evaluation of Supraglottic Phonation.
    Zacharias SR; Myer CM; Meinzen-Derr J; Kelchner L; Deliyski DD; de Alarcón A
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Oct; 125(10):829-37. PubMed ID: 27411363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of Videostroboscopy and High-Speed Videoendoscopy to Obtain Functional Outcomes From Perioperative Ratings in Patients With Vocal Fold Mass Lesions.
    Powell ME; Deliyski DD; Zeitels SM; Burns JA; Hillman RE; Gerlach TT; Mehta DD
    J Voice; 2020 Sep; 34(5):769-782. PubMed ID: 31005449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current role of stroboscopy in laryngeal imaging.
    Mehta DD; Hillman RE
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Dec; 20(6):429-36. PubMed ID: 22931908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Objective Measures of Stroboscopy and High-Speed Video.
    Woo P
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2020; 85():25-44. PubMed ID: 33166979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The significance of videostroboscopy in laryngological practice].
    Fleischer S; Hess M
    HNO; 2006 Aug; 54(8):628-34. PubMed ID: 16832666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Videostroboscopy to Stroboscopy Derived From High-Speed Videoendoscopy for Evaluating Patients With Vocal Fold Mass Lesions.
    Powell ME; Deliyski DD; Hillman RE; Zeitels SM; Burns JA; Mehta DD
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2016 Nov; 25(4):576-589. PubMed ID: 27716854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The interrater reliability of stroboscopy evaluations.
    Nawka T; Konerding U
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):812.e1-10. PubMed ID: 22516314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative rating of video-laryngostroboscopy: a reliability study.
    Dejonckere PH; Crevier L; Elbaz E; Marraco M; Millet B; Remacle M; Woisard V
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1998; 119(4):259-60. PubMed ID: 9865103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electronic videoendoscopic laryngostroboscopy.
    Kawaida M; Fukuda H; Kohno N
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2004; 66(5):267-74. PubMed ID: 15583441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flexible laryngoscopy: a comparison of fiber optic and distal chip technologies-part 2: laryngopharyngeal reflux.
    Eller R; Ginsburg M; Lurie D; Heman-Ackah Y; Lyons K; Sataloff R
    J Voice; 2009 May; 23(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 19185459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the Dysphonic Patient (in: Function Preservation in Laryngeal Cancer).
    Whited CW; Dailey SH
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2015 Aug; 48(4):547-64. PubMed ID: 26096136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of laryngostroboscopic evaluation on lesion size and glottal configuration: a revisit.
    Yiu EM; Lau VC; Ma EP; Chan KM; Barrett E
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jul; 124(7):1638-44. PubMed ID: 24222186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laryngitis obscuring an anterior glottic mass.
    Thompson JD; Moore JE; Sataloff RT
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2016 Jan; 95(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 26829678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.