145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25259663)
1. Is there any predictor for residual disease after cervical conization with positive surgical margins for HSIL or microinvasive cervical cancer?
Tasci T; Turan T; Ureyen I; Karalok A; Kalyoncu R; Boran N; Tulunay G
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2015 Apr; 19(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 25259663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictors of residual carcinoma or carcinoma-in-situ at hysterectomy following cervical conization with positive margins.
Diaz ES; Aoyama C; Baquing MA; Beavis A; Silva E; Holschneider C; Cass I
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 24262876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Triage for management of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive margin by conization: a retrospective analysis.
Dou Y; Zhang X; Li Y; Wang F; Xie X; Wang X
Front Med; 2017 Jun; 11(2):223-228. PubMed ID: 28488232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk Factor Analysis of Persistent High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Conization.
Chen L; Liu L; Tao X; Guo L; Zhang H; Sui L
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2019 Jan; 23(1):24-27. PubMed ID: 30371553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Relationship between various histological status of margins of LEEP and residual HSIL or worse at hysterectomy following conization].
Xiao YP; Tao X; Zhao CY; Qu YQ; Xie F; Ning Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 30695901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of conization specimens.
Chang DY; Cheng WF; Torng PL; Chen RJ; Huang SC
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8898168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Management of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive margin after LEEP conization: A retrospective study.
Abdulaziz AMA; You X; Liu L; Sun Y; Zhang J; Sun S; Li X; Sun W; Dong Y; Liu H; Zhang Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 May; 100(20):e26030. PubMed ID: 34011112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors That Influence Surgical Margin State in Patients Undergoing Cold Knife Conization - A Single Center Experience.
Aluloski I; Tanturovski M; Petrusevska G; Jovanovic R; Kostadinova-Kunovska S
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2017 Dec; 38(3):113-120. PubMed ID: 29668476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Discussion on the diagnosis and treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in post-menopausal women].
Cao QW; You ZX; Qian XY; Heng D; Tang MY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):393-398. PubMed ID: 31262123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of cervical conization as a definitive treatment for microinvasive cervical carcinoma and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
Takeda N; Suzuki T; Suzuki M; Matsuura M; Tanaka R; Fujii M; Ito E; Saito T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Feb; 285(2):453-7. PubMed ID: 21681515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endocervical curettage, cone margins, and residual adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
Denehy TR; Gregori CA; Breen JL
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 90(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9207802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinicopathologic features of early adenocarcinoma of the cervix initially managed with cervical conization.
Poynor EA; Marshall D; Sonoda Y; Slomovitz BM; Barakat RR; Soslow RA
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Dec; 103(3):960-5. PubMed ID: 16860853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The risk of residual neoplasia in women with microinvasive squamous cervical carcinoma and positive cone margins.
Phongnarisorn C; Srisomboon J; Khunamornpong S; Siriaungkul S; Suprasert P; Charoenkwan K; Cheewakriangkrai C; Siriaree S; Pantasri T
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2006; 16(2):655-9. PubMed ID: 16681742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The characteristics of the residual disease after cervical conization: A retrospective analysis from a tertiary gynecological cancer center.
Giray B; Kabaca C; Uzun MG
Indian J Cancer; 2023; 60(3):390-395. PubMed ID: 36861714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can we predict surgical margin positivity while performing cervical excisional procedures?
Durmuş Y; Karalök A; Başaran D; Kamani MO; Boran N; Koç S; Turan AT
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):666-672. PubMed ID: 31482755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors affecting residual/recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after cervical conization with negative margins.
Fan A; Wang C; Han C; Wang Y; Xue F; Zhang L
J Med Virol; 2018 Sep; 90(9):1541-1548. PubMed ID: 29704442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II-III with endocervical cone margin involvement after cervical loop conization: is there any predictor for residual disease?
Kietpeerakool C; Khunamornpong S; Srisomboon J; Siriaunkgul S; Suprasert P
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Oct; 33(5):660-4. PubMed ID: 17845326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of a machine learning-based model for predicting positive margins in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) treatment by Cold Knife Conization(CKC): a single-center retrospective study.
Zhang L; Zheng Y; Lei L; Zhang X; Yang J; Zeng Y; Chen K
BMC Womens Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):332. PubMed ID: 38849836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Risk factors of predicting residual disease in women with stage I a1 squamous cervical carcinoma after conization].
Zhu XE; Feng Y; Fu YF; Cheng XD; Chen XD; Xie X; Lü WG
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Feb; 93(7):534-6. PubMed ID: 23660325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
