BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25259899)

  • 1. Should the annual pelvic examination go the way of annual cervical cytology?
    MacLaughlin KL; Faubion SS; Long ME; Pruthi S; Casey PM
    Womens Health (Lond); 2014 Jul; 10(4):373-84. PubMed ID: 25259899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No. 385-Indications for Pelvic Examination.
    Evans D; Goldstein S; Loewy A; Altman AD
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Aug; 41(8):1221-1234. PubMed ID: 31331610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do new guidelines and technology make the routine pelvic examination obsolete?
    Westhoff CL; Jones HE; Guiahi M
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2011 Jan; 20(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 21194307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Annual Gynecologic Examination Updated for the 21st Century.
    Cappiello J; Levi A
    Nurs Womens Health; 2016; 20(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 27287359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Routine pelvic examinations: A descriptive cross-sectional survey of women's attitudes and beliefs after new guidelines.
    Kling JM; Vegunta S; Al-Badri M; Faubion SS; Fields HE; Shah AA; Wallace MR; Ruddy BE; Bryan MJ; Temkit M; MacLaughlin KL
    Prev Med; 2017 Jan; 94():60-64. PubMed ID: 27856341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physician characteristics and beliefs associated with use of pelvic examinations in asymptomatic women.
    Stormo AR; Cooper CP; Hawkins NA; Saraiya M
    Prev Med; 2012 Jun; 54(6):415-21. PubMed ID: 22484240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current recommendations for cervical cancer screening: do they render the annual pelvic examination obsolete?
    Kauffman RP; Griffin SJ; Lund JD; Tullar PE
    Med Princ Pract; 2013; 22(4):313-22. PubMed ID: 23328247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prevalence of Potentially Unnecessary Bimanual Pelvic Examinations and Papanicolaou Tests Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women Aged 15-20 Years in the United States.
    Qin J; Saraiya M; Martinez G; Sawaya GF
    JAMA Intern Med; 2020 Feb; 180(2):274-280. PubMed ID: 31904768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identifying acute cervicitis in an era of less-frequent routine gynecologic examinations.
    Allen M
    JAAPA; 2018 Feb; 31(2):50-53. PubMed ID: 29369931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of speculum and bimanual examinations when evaluating attendees at a sexually transmitted diseases clinic.
    Singh RH; Erbelding EJ; Zenilman JM; Ghanem KG
    Sex Transm Infect; 2007 Jun; 83(3):206-10. PubMed ID: 17108005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 754: The Utility of and Indications for Routine Pelvic Examination.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Oct; 132(4):e174-e180. PubMed ID: 30247363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The challenging pelvic examination.
    Bates CK; Carroll N; Potter J
    J Gen Intern Med; 2011 Jun; 26(6):651-7. PubMed ID: 21225474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Obstetrician-Gynecologist Practices and Beliefs Regarding External Genitalia Inspection and Speculum Examinations in Healthy Older Asymptomatic Women.
    Hsu A; Henderson JT; Harper CC; Sawaya GF
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2016 Feb; 64(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 26805728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The first pelvic examination for an adolescent: is this rite of passage used to its full potential?
    Siwe K; Wijma B
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 25(5):357-63. PubMed ID: 24018872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A systematic review of the bimanual examination as a test for ovarian cancer.
    Ebell MH; Culp M; Lastinger K; Dasigi T
    Am J Prev Med; 2015 Mar; 48(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 25595604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Women's beliefs about the purpose and value of routine pelvic examinations.
    Norrell LL; Kuppermann M; Moghadassi MN; Sawaya GF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):86.e1-86.e6. PubMed ID: 28040449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Barriers to cervical cancer screening in women attending the Family Medical Program in Niterói, Rio de Janeiro.
    Augusto EF; Rosa ML; Cavalcanti SM; Oliveira LH
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 287(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 22886356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Required examinations and tests before initiating contraception: Provider practices from a national cross-sectional survey.
    Krashin JW; Zapata LB; Morgan IA; Tepper NK; Jatlaoui TC; Frederiksen BN; Whiteman MK; Curtis KM
    Contraception; 2021 Apr; 103(4):232-238. PubMed ID: 33454373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 'About as comfortable as a stranger putting their finger up your nose': speculation about the (extra)ordinary in gynaecological examinations.
    Cook C
    Cult Health Sex; 2011 Aug; 13(7):767-80. PubMed ID: 21656407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.