421 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25260059)
1. A prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing clinical outcomes of patients treated surgically with a static or dynamic implant for acute ankle syndesmosis rupture.
Laflamme M; Belzile EL; Bédard L; van den Bekerom MP; Glazebrook M; Pelet S
J Orthop Trauma; 2015 May; 29(5):216-23. PubMed ID: 25260059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences in gait analysis and clinical outcome after TightRope® or screw fixation in acute syndesmosis rupture: study protocol for a prospective randomized pilot study.
Doll J; Waizenegger S; Bruckner T; Schmidmaier G; Wolf SI; Fischer C
Trials; 2020 Jul; 21(1):606. PubMed ID: 32616003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective randomised study comparing TightRope and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy and maintenance of syndesmotic reduction assessed with bilateral computed tomography.
Kortekangas T; Savola O; Flinkkilä T; Lepojärvi S; Nortunen S; Ohtonen P; Katisko J; Pakarinen H
Injury; 2015; 46(6):1119-26. PubMed ID: 25769201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved Reduction of the Tibiofibular Syndesmosis With TightRope Compared With Screw Fixation: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study.
Sanders D; Schneider P; Taylor M; Tieszer C; Lawendy AR;
J Orthop Trauma; 2019 Nov; 33(11):531-537. PubMed ID: 31633643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lower complication rate and faster return to sports in patients with acute syndesmotic rupture treated with a new knotless suture button device.
Colcuc C; Blank M; Stein T; Raimann F; Weber-Spickschen S; Fischer S; Hoffmann R
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Oct; 26(10):3156-3164. PubMed ID: 29224059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fixation of ankle syndesmotic injuries: comparison of tightrope fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy of syndesmotic reduction.
Naqvi GA; Cunningham P; Lynch B; Galvin R; Awan N
Am J Sports Med; 2012 Dec; 40(12):2828-35. PubMed ID: 23051785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.
Zhang P; Liang Y; He J; Fang Y; Chen P; Wang J
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Jul; 18(1):286. PubMed ID: 28676078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic Stabilization of Syndesmosis Injuries Reduces Complications and Reoperations as Compared With Screw Fixation: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Grassi A; Samuelsson K; D'Hooghe P; Romagnoli M; Mosca M; Zaffagnini S; Amendola A
Am J Sports Med; 2020 Mar; 48(4):1000-1013. PubMed ID: 31188642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functional and radiographic results of patients with syndesmotic screw fixation: implications for screw removal.
Manjoo A; Sanders DW; Tieszer C; MacLeod MD
J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Jan; 24(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 20035170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Treatment of Ankle Fractures With Syndesmotic Rupture: Suture-Button Fixation Versus Cortical Screw Fixation.
McKenzie AC; Hesselholt KE; Larsen MS; Schmal H
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Sep; 58(5):946-953. PubMed ID: 31474406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technical aspects of the syndesmotic screw and their effect on functional outcome following acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.
Schepers T; van der Linden H; van Lieshout EM; Niesten DD; van der Elst M
Injury; 2014 Apr; 45(4):775-9. PubMed ID: 24139172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized trial comparing suture button with single 3.5 mm syndesmotic screw for ankle syndesmosis injury: similar results at 2 years.
Ræder BW; Stake IK; Madsen JE; Frihagen F; Jacobsen SB; Andersen MR; Figved W
Acta Orthop; 2020 Dec; 91(6):770-775. PubMed ID: 32907456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tightrope fixation of syndesmotic injuries in Weber C ankle fractures: a multicentre case series.
Anand A; Wei R; Patel A; Vedi V; Allardice G; Anand BS
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2017 May; 27(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 28074301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Arthroscopically measured syndesmotic stability after screw vs. suture button fixation in a cadaveric model.
Lubberts B; Vopat BG; Wolf JC; Longo UG; DiGiovanni CW; Guss D
Injury; 2017 Nov; 48(11):2433-2437. PubMed ID: 28899558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tightrope fixation of ankle syndesmosis injuries: clinical outcome, complications and technique modification.
Naqvi GA; Shafqat A; Awan N
Injury; 2012 Jun; 43(6):838-42. PubMed ID: 22036451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fate of the syndesmotic screw--Search for a prudent solution.
Kaftandziev I; Spasov M; Trpeski S; Zafirova-Ivanovska B; Bakota B
Injury; 2015 Nov; 46 Suppl 6():S125-9. PubMed ID: 26582218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of screw fixation with elastic fixation methods in the treatment of syndesmosis injuries in ankle fractures.
Seyhan M; Donmez F; Mahirogullari M; Cakmak S; Mutlu S; Guler O
Injury; 2015 Jul; 46 Suppl 2():S19-23. PubMed ID: 26117414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The radiographic fate of the syndesmosis after trans-syndesmotic screw removal in displaced ankle fractures.
Jordan TH; Talarico RH; Schuberth JM
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2011; 50(4):407-12. PubMed ID: 21596590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Functional outcomes following syndesmotic fixation: A comparison of screws retained in situ versus routine removal - Is it really necessary?
Tucker A; Street J; Kealey D; McDonald S; Stevenson M
Injury; 2013 Dec; 44(12):1880-4. PubMed ID: 24021584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcome after unstable ankle fracture: effect of syndesmotic stabilization.
Egol KA; Pahk B; Walsh M; Tejwani NC; Davidovitch RI; Koval KJ
J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Jan; 24(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 20035171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
