700 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25260094)
1. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging measurements in renal cell carcinoma: effect of region of interest size and positioning on interobserver and intraobserver variability.
Braunagel M; Radler E; Ingrisch M; Staehler M; Schmid-Tannwald C; Rist C; Nikolaou K; Reiser MF; Notohamiprodjo M
Invest Radiol; 2015 Jan; 50(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 25260094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging assessment of kidney function and renal masses: single slice versus whole organ/tumor.
Winter KS; Helck AD; Ingrisch M; Staehler M; Stief C; Sommer WH; Braunagel M; Kazmierczak PM; Reiser MF; Nikolaou K; Notohamiprodjo M
Invest Radiol; 2014 Nov; 49(11):720-7. PubMed ID: 24901546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combined diffusion-weighted, blood oxygen level-dependent, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for characterization and differentiation of renal cell carcinoma.
Notohamiprodjo M; Staehler M; Steiner N; Schwab F; Sourbron SP; Michaely HJ; Helck AD; Reiser MF; Nikolaou K
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):685-93. PubMed ID: 23664397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproducibility of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Analysis on Intra- and Interobserver and Scan-Rescan Performance of Pharmacokinetic Parameters.
Wang H; Su Z; Ye H; Xu X; Sun Z; Li L; Duan F; Song Y; Lambrou T; Ma L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Sep; 94(37):e1529. PubMed ID: 26376399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inter- and intra-rater reproducibility of quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced MRI using TWIST perfusion data in a uterine fibroid model.
Davenport MS; Heye T; Dale BM; Horvath JJ; Breault SR; Feuerlein S; Bashir MR; Boll DT; Merkle EM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Aug; 38(2):329-35. PubMed ID: 23239041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Part II. Comparison of intra- and interobserver variability with manual region of interest placement versus semiautomatic lesion segmentation and histogram analysis.
Heye T; Merkle EM; Reiner CS; Davenport MS; Horvath JJ; Feuerlein S; Breault SR; Gall P; Bashir MR; Dale BM; Kiraly AP; Boll DT
Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):812-21. PubMed ID: 23220891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: assessment of perfusion-related parameters compared to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Fujima N; Yoshida D; Sakashita T; Homma A; Tsukahara A; Tha KK; Kudo K; Shirato H
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Dec; 32(10):1206-13. PubMed ID: 25131628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MR-based semi-automated quantification of renal functional parameters with a two-compartment model--an interobserver analysis.
Attenberger UI; Sourbron SP; Notohamiprodjo M; Lodemann KP; Glaser CG; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO; Michaely HJ
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 18022338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of tumors: preclinical validation of parametric images.
Egeland TA; Simonsen TG; Gaustad JV; Gulliksrud K; Ellingsen C; Rofstad EK
Radiat Res; 2009 Sep; 172(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 19708783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tracer kinetics analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR data in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: comparison of the results.
Bisdas S; Baghi M; Wagenblast J; Bisdas T; Thng CH; Mack MG; Koh TS; Ernemann U
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2009 Sep; 29(5):339-46. PubMed ID: 19473200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Absolute quantification of regional renal blood flow in swine by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a blood pool contrast agent.
Lüdemann L; Nafz B; Elsner F; Grosse-Siestrup C; Meissler M; Kaufels N; Rehbein H; Persson PB; Michaely HJ; Lengsfeld P; Voth M; Gutberlet M
Invest Radiol; 2009 Mar; 44(3):125-34. PubMed ID: 19151609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation Between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters in Rectal Cancer.
Sun H; Xu Y; Xu Q; Duan J; Zhang H; Liu T; Li L; Chan Q; Xie S; Wang W
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):e134-e140. PubMed ID: 30268719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tumor Vascularity in Renal Masses: Correlation of Arterial Spin-Labeled and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessments.
Zhang Y; Kapur P; Yuan Q; Xi Y; Carvo I; Signoretti S; Dimitrov I; Cadeddu JA; Margulis V; Muradyan N; Brugarolas J; Madhuranthakam AJ; Pedrosa I
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2016 Feb; 14(1):e25-36. PubMed ID: 26422014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The application of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI in patients with maxillofacial tumors.
Kitamoto E; Chikui T; Kawano S; Ohga M; Kobayashi K; Matsuo Y; Yoshiura T; Obara M; Honda H; Yoshiura K
Acad Radiol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 25442795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in head-and-neck cancer: the impact of region of interest selection on the intra- and interpatient variability of pharmacokinetic parameters.
Craciunescu OI; Yoo DS; Cleland E; Muradyan N; Carroll MD; MacFall JR; Barboriak DP; Brizel DM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Mar; 82(3):e345-50. PubMed ID: 21985945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: reproducibility analysis and observer variability of the distributed parameter model.
Ng QS; Thng CH; Lim WT; Hartono S; Thian YL; Lee PS; Tan DS; Tan EH; Koh TS
Invest Radiol; 2012 Jan; 47(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 21577128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraobserver and interobserver variability of renal volume measurements in polycystic kidney disease using a semiautomated MR segmentation algorithm.
Cohen BA; Barash I; Kim DC; Sanger MD; Babb JS; Chandarana H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 22826401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measuring perfusion and permeability in renal cell carcinoma with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a pilot study.
Notohamiprodjo M; Sourbron S; Staehler M; Michaely HJ; Attenberger UI; Schmidt GP; Boehm H; Horng A; Glaser C; Stief C; Reiser MF; Herrmann KA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Feb; 31(2):490-501. PubMed ID: 20099364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of pulmonary perfusion with breath-hold and free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: quantification and reproducibility.
Ingrisch M; Maxien D; Schwab F; Reiser MF; Nikolaou K; Dietrich O
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jun; 49(6):382-9. PubMed ID: 24473368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
