655 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25260734)
21. Efficacy of laser-driven irrigation versus ultrasonic in removing an airlock from the apical third of a narrow root canal.
Peeters HH; Gutknecht N
Aust Endod J; 2014 Aug; 40(2):47-53. PubMed ID: 25244217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of needle insertion depth and root canal curvature on irrigant extrusion ex vivo.
Psimma Z; Boutsioukis C; Kastrinakis E; Vasiliadis L
J Endod; 2013 Apr; 39(4):521-4. PubMed ID: 23522549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative safety of various intracanal irrigation systems.
Desai P; Himel V
J Endod; 2009 Apr; 35(4):545-9. PubMed ID: 19345802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparative study of the debridement efficacy and apical extrusion of dynamic and passive root canal irrigation systems.
Alkahtani A; Al Khudhairi TD; Anil S
BMC Oral Health; 2014 Feb; 14():12. PubMed ID: 24512441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Efficacy of irrigation systems on penetration of sodium hypochlorite to working length and to simulated uninstrumented areas in oval shaped root canals.
de Gregorio C; Paranjpe A; Garcia A; Navarrete N; Estevez R; Esplugues EO; Cohenca N
Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):475-81. PubMed ID: 22283697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effectiveness of final irrigant protocols for debris removal from simulated canal irregularities.
Martins Justo A; Abreu da Rosa R; Santini MF; Cardoso Ferreira MB; Pereira JR; Húngaro Duarte MA; Reis Só MV
J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2009-14. PubMed ID: 25266470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Efficacy and safety of various active irrigation devices when used with either positive or negative pressure: an in vitro study.
Malentacca A; Uccioli U; Zangari D; Lajolo C; Fabiani C
J Endod; 2012 Dec; 38(12):1622-6. PubMed ID: 23146649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative evaluation of canal isthmus debridement efficacy of modified EndoVac technique with different irrigation systems.
Thomas AR; Velmurugan N; Smita S; Jothilatha S
J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1676-80. PubMed ID: 25052146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Relationship between the size of patency file and apical extrusion of sodium hypochlorite.
Camoes IC; Salles MR; Fernando MV; Freitas LF; Gomes CC
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):426-30. PubMed ID: 20139565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Vibringe, EndoActivator, and needle irrigation on sealer penetration in extracted human teeth.
Bolles JA; He J; Svoboda KK; Schneiderman E; Glickman GN
J Endod; 2013 May; 39(5):708-11. PubMed ID: 23611397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Necrotic pulp tissue dissolution by passive ultrasonic irrigation in simulated accessory canals: impact of canal location and angulation.
Al-Jadaa A; Paqué F; Attin T; Zehnder M
Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 19125981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of a continuous ultrasonic irrigation device and conventional needle irrigation in the removal of root canal debris.
Curtis TO; Sedgley CM
J Endod; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1261-4. PubMed ID: 22892747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of apical extrusion of NaOCl using the EndoVac or needle irrigation of root canals.
Mitchell RP; Yang SE; Baumgartner JC
J Endod; 2010 Feb; 36(2):338-41. PubMed ID: 20113804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of root canal dimensions, injection rate, and needle design on the apical extrusion of an irrigant: an in vitro study.
Chang JW; Cheung AW; Cheung GS
J Investig Clin Dent; 2015 Aug; 6(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 25047790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of maintaining apical patency on periapical extrusion.
Lambrianidis T; Tosounidou E; Tzoanopoulou M
J Endod; 2001 Nov; 27(11):696-8. PubMed ID: 11716084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Debris and irrigant extrusion potential of 2 rotary systems and irrigation needles.
Altundasar E; Nagas E; Uyanik O; Serper A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):e31-5. PubMed ID: 21778084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Wall shear stress effects of different endodontic irrigation techniques and systems.
Goode N; Khan S; Eid AA; Niu LN; Gosier J; Susin LF; Pashley DH; Tay FR
J Dent; 2013 Jul; 41(7):636-41. PubMed ID: 23603086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of the Vibringe system with syringe and passive ultrasonic irrigation in removing debris from simulated root canal irregularities.
Rödig T; Bozkurt M; Konietschke F; Hülsmann M
J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1410-3. PubMed ID: 20647107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Antibacterial Efficacy of a New Sonic Irrigation Device for Root Canal Disinfection.
Neuhaus KW; Liebi M; Stauffacher S; Eick S; Lussi A
J Endod; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1799-1803. PubMed ID: 27780580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
