467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25261321)
1. To what extent can linear finite element models of human femora predict failure under stance and fall loading configurations?
Schileo E; Balistreri L; Grassi L; Cristofolini L; Taddei F
J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(14):3531-8. PubMed ID: 25261321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can CT image deblurring improve finite element predictions at the proximal femur?
Falcinelli C; Schileo E; Pakdel A; Whyne C; Cristofolini L; Taddei F
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Oct; 63():337-351. PubMed ID: 27450036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method.
Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsuyama J; Matsumoto T; Imai K; Nakamura K
J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1745-53. PubMed ID: 17034798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ct-based finite element models can be used to estimate experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur.
Koivumäki JE; Thevenot J; Pulkkinen P; Kuhn V; Link TM; Eckstein F; Jämsä T
Bone; 2012 Apr; 50(4):824-9. PubMed ID: 22306697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions.
Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsumoto T; Ohashi S; Matsuyama J; Tobita K; Kaneko M; Nakamura K
Bone; 2009 Aug; 45(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 19398043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cortical bone finite element models in the estimation of experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur.
Koivumäki JE; Thevenot J; Pulkkinen P; Kuhn V; Link TM; Eckstein F; Jämsä T
Bone; 2012 Oct; 51(4):737-40. PubMed ID: 22796418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study.
Miura M; Nakamura J; Matsuura Y; Wako Y; Suzuki T; Hagiwara S; Orita S; Inage K; Kawarai Y; Sugano M; Nawata K; Ohtori S
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Dec; 18(1):536. PubMed ID: 29246133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experimental validation of DXA-based finite element models for prediction of femoral strength.
Dall'Ara E; Eastell R; Viceconti M; Pahr D; Yang L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Oct; 63():17-25. PubMed ID: 27341287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Orthotropic HR-pQCT-based FE models improve strength predictions for stance but not for side-way fall loading compared to isotropic QCT-based FE models of human femurs.
Luisier B; Dall'Ara E; Pahr DH
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Apr; 32():287-299. PubMed ID: 24508715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of femoral fracture load using finite element models: an examination of stress- and strain-based failure theories.
Keyak JH; Rossi SA
J Biomech; 2000 Feb; 33(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 10653034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of finite element predictions in sideways load configurations for the proximal human femur.
Grassi L; Schileo E; Taddei F; Zani L; Juszczyk M; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
J Biomech; 2012 Jan; 45(2):394-9. PubMed ID: 22079387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Study of stress variations in single-stance and sideways fall using image-based finite element analysis.
Faisal TR; Luo Y
Biomed Mater Eng; 2016 May; 27(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 27175463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part I--Linear analysis.
Lotz JC; Cheal EJ; Hayes WC
J Biomech Eng; 1991 Nov; 113(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 1762430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of the pathological fracture risk during stance and fall-loading configurations for metastases in the proximal femur, using a computed tomography-based finite element method.
Shinoda Y; Kobayashi H; Kaneko M; Ohashi S; Bessho M; Hayashi N; Oka H; Imanishi J; Sawada R; Ogura K; Tanaka S; Haga N; Kawano H
J Orthop Sci; 2019 Nov; 24(6):1074-1080. PubMed ID: 31521453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiple loading conditions analysis can improve the association between finite element bone strength estimates and proximal femur fractures: a preliminary study in elderly women.
Falcinelli C; Schileo E; Balistreri L; Baruffaldi F; Bordini B; Viceconti M; Albisinni U; Ceccarelli F; Milandri L; Toni A; Taddei F
Bone; 2014 Oct; 67():71-80. PubMed ID: 25014885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Subject-specific finite element models implementing a maximum principal strain criterion are able to estimate failure risk and fracture location on human femurs tested in vitro.
Schileo E; Taddei F; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
J Biomech; 2008; 41(2):356-67. PubMed ID: 18022179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cortical bone mapping improves finite element strain prediction accuracy at the proximal femur.
Schileo E; Pitocchi J; Falcinelli C; Taddei F
Bone; 2020 Jul; 136():115348. PubMed ID: 32240847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of femoral strength using 3D finite element models reconstructed from DXA images: validation against experiments.
Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Ristinmaa M; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Jun; 16(3):989-1000. PubMed ID: 28004226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mapping anisotropy improves QCT-based finite element estimation of hip strength in pooled stance and side-fall load configurations.
Panyasantisuk J; Dall'Ara E; Pretterklieber M; Pahr DH; Zysset PK
Med Eng Phys; 2018 Sep; 59():36-42. PubMed ID: 30131112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DXA predictions of human femoral mechanical properties depend on the load configuration.
Dall'Ara E; Luisier B; Schmidt R; Pretterklieber M; Kainberger F; Zysset P; Pahr D
Med Eng Phys; 2013 Nov; 35(11):1564-72; discussion 1564. PubMed ID: 23684578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
