303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25261772)
1. Importance of cochlear health for implant function.
Pfingst BE; Zhou N; Colesa DJ; Watts MM; Strahl SB; Garadat SN; Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Budenz CL; Raphael Y; Zwolan TA
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():77-88. PubMed ID: 25261772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of responses to cochlear implant stimulation at different levels of the auditory pathway.
Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():67-76. PubMed ID: 25445817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Considering optogenetic stimulation for cochlear implants.
Jeschke M; Moser T
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():224-34. PubMed ID: 25601298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and evaluation of the Nurotron 26-electrode cochlear implant system.
Zeng FG; Rebscher SJ; Fu QJ; Chen H; Sun X; Yin L; Ping L; Feng H; Yang S; Gong S; Yang B; Kang HY; Gao N; Chi F
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():188-99. PubMed ID: 25281795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The multi-channel cochlear implant: multi-disciplinary development of electrical stimulation of the cochlea and the resulting clinical benefit.
Clark GM
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():4-13. PubMed ID: 25159273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The early days of the multi channel cochlear implant: efforts and achievement in France.
Chouard CH
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():47-51. PubMed ID: 25499127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants.
Laback B; Egger K; Majdak P
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():138-50. PubMed ID: 25456088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Binaural hearing with electrical stimulation.
Kan A; Litovsky RY
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():127-37. PubMed ID: 25193553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The contributions of William F. House to the field of implantable auditory devices.
Eisenberg LS
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():52-6. PubMed ID: 25159272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cochlear infrastructure for electrical hearing.
Pfingst BE; Bowling SA; Colesa DJ; Garadat SN; Raphael Y; Shibata SB; Strahl SB; Su GL; Zhou N
Hear Res; 2011 Nov; 281(1-2):65-73. PubMed ID: 21605648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Auditory midbrain implant: research and development towards a second clinical trial.
Lim HH; Lenarz T
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():212-23. PubMed ID: 25613994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gradual adaptation to auditory frequency mismatch.
Svirsky MA; Talavage TM; Sinha S; Neuburger H; Azadpour M
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():163-70. PubMed ID: 25445816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Getting a decent (but sparse) signal to the brain for users of cochlear implants.
Wilson BS
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():24-38. PubMed ID: 25500178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electroacoustic Stimulation.
Li C; Kuhlmey M; Kim AH
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2019 Apr; 52(2):311-322. PubMed ID: 30617011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech perception with interaction-compensated simultaneous stimulation and long pulse durations in cochlear implant users.
Schatzer R; Koroleva I; Griessner A; Levin S; Kusovkov V; Yanov Y; Zierhofer C
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():99-106. PubMed ID: 25457654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PET-imaging of brain plasticity after cochlear implantation.
Strelnikov K; Marx M; Lagleyre S; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Barone P
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():180-7. PubMed ID: 25448166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception.
Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U
Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors constraining the benefit to speech understanding of combining information from low-frequency hearing and a cochlear implant.
Dorman MF; Cook S; Spahr A; Zhang T; Loiselle L; Schramm D; Whittingham J; Gifford R
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():107-11. PubMed ID: 25285624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Current focussing in cochlear implants: an analysis of neural recruitment in a computational model.
Kalkman RK; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():89-98. PubMed ID: 25528491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contralateral suppression of human hearing sensitivity in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.
Nogueira W; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lopez-Poveda E
Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 373():121-129. PubMed ID: 29941311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
