234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25263143)
21. A clinical comparison between nickel titanium springs and elastomeric chains.
Bokas J; Woods M
Aust Orthod J; 2006 May; 22(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 16792244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) on pulpal blood flow after orthodontic treatment: a randomized clinical trial.
Falkensammer F; Schaden W; Krall C; Freudenthaler J; Bantleon HP
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):373-9. PubMed ID: 26179985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Molar distalization with the assistance of Temporary Anchorage Devices.
Palencar AJ
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2015; 26(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 25881377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
Songra G; Clover M; Atack NE; Ewings P; Sherriff M; Sandy JR; Ireland AJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 24785921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Immediate versus delayed loading: comparison of primary stability loss after miniscrew placement in orthodontic patients-a single-centre blinded randomized clinical trial.
Migliorati M; Drago S; Gallo F; Amorfini L; Dalessandri D; Calzolari C; Benedicenti S; Silvestrini-Biavati A
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Dec; 38(6):652-659. PubMed ID: 26728036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of low-level laser therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement.
Limpanichkul W; Godfrey K; Srisuk N; Rattanayatikul C
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2006 Feb; 9(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 16420273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Restoration of an alveolar bone defect caused by an ankylosed mandibular molar by root movement of the adjacent tooth with miniscrew implants.
Lee KJ; Joo E; Yu HS; Park YC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):440-9. PubMed ID: 19732679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Mini-implant temporary anchorage devices: orthodontic applications.
Yanosky MR; Holmes JD
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008; 29(1):12-20; quiz 21, 30. PubMed ID: 18361337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Outcomes and stability in patients with anterior open bite and long anterior face height treated with temporary anchorage devices and a maxillary intrusion splint.
Scheffler NR; Proffit WR; Phillips C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 25439210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Maxillary molar distalization with the indirect Palatal miniscrew for Anchorage and Distalization Appliance (iPANDA).
Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e228-41. PubMed ID: 23646335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Physical properties of root cementum: part 14. The amount of root resorption after force application for 12 weeks on maxillary and mandibular premolars: a microcomputed-tomography study.
Paetyangkul A; Türk T; Elekdağ-Türk S; Jones AS; Petocz P; Darendeliler MA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):492.e1-9; discussion 492-3. PubMed ID: 19815148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Efficacy of the Nance appliance as an anchorage-reinforcement method.
Al-Awadhi EA; Garvey TM; Alhag M; Claffey NM; O'Connell B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 25726400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
Thiruvenkatachari B; Ammayappan P; Kandaswamy R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Risk factors and indications of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a literature review.
Hoste S; Vercruyssen M; Quirynen M; Willems G
Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 19113080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Use of miniscrews as temporary anchorage devices in orthodontic practice. I--Introduction.
Anka G
Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 17203577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanical evaluation of an orthodontic miniimplant used with revolving (translation and rotation) temporary anchorage device by finite element analysis and experimental testing.
Lin YS; Yu JH; Chang YZ; Lin CL
Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 23303268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Temporary anchorage devices for tooth movement: a review and case reports.
McGuire MK; Scheyer ET; Gallerano RL
J Periodontol; 2006 Oct; 77(10):1613-24. PubMed ID: 17032102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Analysis of temporary skeletal anchorage devices used for en-masse retraction: a preliminary study.
Kim SH; Hwang YS; Ferreira A; Chung KR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 19651358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bone density and miniscrew stability in orthodontic patients.
Samrit V; Kharbanda OP; Duggal R; Seith A; Malhotra V
Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 23304969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
