280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25264155)
1. Impact of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging on cardiac care.
Lugomirski P; Chow BJ; Ruddy TD
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2014 Nov; 12(11):1247-9. PubMed ID: 25264155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of substituting dual-energy CT for SPECT in the assessment of myocardial perfusion for the workup of coronary artery disease.
Meyer M; Nance JW; Schoepf UJ; Moscariello A; Weininger M; Rowe GW; Ruzsics B; Kang DK; Chiaramida SA; Schoenberg SO; Fink C; Henzler T
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):3719-25. PubMed ID: 21277132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Costs and clinical outcomes after coronary multidetector CT angiography in patients without known coronary artery disease: comparison to myocardial perfusion SPECT.
Min JK; Kang N; Shaw LJ; Devereux RB; Robinson M; Lin F; Legorreta AP; Gilmore A
Radiology; 2008 Oct; 249(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 18796668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis.
Takx RA; Blomberg BA; El Aidi H; Habets J; de Jong PA; Nagel E; Hoffmann U; Leiner T
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Costs and clinical outcomes in individuals without known coronary artery disease undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography from an analysis of Medicare category III transaction codes.
Min JK; Shaw LJ; Berman DS; Gilmore A; Kang N
Am J Cardiol; 2008 Sep; 102(6):672-8. PubMed ID: 18773986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of coronary CT angiography versus myocardial perfusion SPECT for evaluation of patients with chest pain and no known coronary artery disease.
Min JK; Gilmore A; Budoff MJ; Berman DS; O'Day K
Radiology; 2010 Mar; 254(3):801-8. PubMed ID: 20177094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic evaluation strategies for individuals with stable chest pain syndrome and suspected coronary artery disease.
Min JK; Gilmore A; Jones EC; Berman DS; Stuijfzand WJ; Shaw LJ; O'Day K; Danad I
Clin Imaging; 2017; 43():97-105. PubMed ID: 28273654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Cost-effectiveness of stress-only myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging].
Vallejo E; Acevedo C; Varela S; Alburez JC; Bialostozky D
Gac Med Mex; 2012; 148(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 22367303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of coronary CT angiography in patients with chest pain: Comparison with myocardial single photon emission tomography.
Lee SP; Jang EJ; Kim YJ; Cha MJ; Park SY; Song HJ; Choi JE; Shim JI; Ahn J; Lee HJ
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(5):428-37. PubMed ID: 25977116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical benefits of noninvasive testing: coronary computed tomography angiography as a test case.
Min JK; Hachamovitch R; Rozanski A; Shaw LJ; Berman DS; Gibbons R
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Mar; 3(3):305-15. PubMed ID: 20223429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial.
Schwitter J; Wacker CM; Wilke N; Al-Saadi N; Sauer E; Huettle K; Schönberg SO; Luchner A; Strohm O; Ahlstrom H; Dill T; Hoebel N; Simor T;
Eur Heart J; 2013 Mar; 34(10):775-81. PubMed ID: 22390914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient management after noninvasive cardiac imaging results from SPARC (Study of myocardial perfusion and coronary anatomy imaging roles in coronary artery disease).
Hachamovitch R; Nutter B; Hlatky MA; Shaw LJ; Ridner ML; Dorbala S; Beanlands RS; Chow BJ; Branscomb E; Chareonthaitawee P; Weigold WG; Voros S; Abbara S; Yasuda T; Jacobs JE; Lesser J; Berman DS; Thomson LE; Raman S; Heller GV; Schussheim A; Brunken R; Williams KA; Farkas S; Delbeke D; Schoepf UJ; Reichek N; Rabinowitz S; Sigman SR; Patterson R; Corn CR; White R; Kazerooni E; Corbett J; Bokhari S; Machac J; Guarneri E; Borges-Neto S; Millstine JW; Caldwell J; Arrighi J; Hoffmann U; Budoff M; Lima J; Johnson JR; Johnson B; Gaber M; Williams JA; Foster C; Hainer J; Di Carli MF;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Jan; 59(5):462-74. PubMed ID: 22281249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.
Jaarsma C; Leiner T; Bekkers SC; Crijns HJ; Wildberger JE; Nagel E; Nelemans PJ; Schalla S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 May; 59(19):1719-28. PubMed ID: 22554604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of stress perfusion MRI and SPECT for detection of myocardial ischemia in patients with angiographically proven three-vessel coronary artery disease.
Chung SY; Lee KY; Chun EJ; Lee WW; Park EK; Chang HJ; Choi SI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):356-62. PubMed ID: 20651190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Role of noninvasive imaging in cardiology].
Gaemperli O
Praxis (Bern 1994); 2013 Jan; 102(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 23384928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: assessment of patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
Berman DS; Hachamovitch R; Shaw LJ; Friedman JD; Hayes SW; Thomson LE; Fieno DS; Germano G; Slomka P; Wong ND; Kang X; Rozanski A
J Nucl Med; 2006 Jan; 47(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 16391190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of sulfur hexafluoride microbubble (SonoVue)-enhanced myocardial contrast echocardiography with gated single-photon emission computed tomography for detection of significant coronary artery disease: a large European multicenter study.
Senior R; Moreo A; Gaibazzi N; Agati L; Tiemann K; Shivalkar B; von Bardeleben S; Galiuto L; Lardoux H; Trocino G; Carrió I; Le Guludec D; Sambuceti G; Becher H; Colonna P; Ten Cate F; Bramucci E; Cohen A; Bezante G; Aggeli C; Kasprzak JD
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 62(15):1353-61. PubMed ID: 23770168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Regadenoson-stress myocardial CT perfusion and single-photon emission CT: rationale, design, and acquisition methods of a prospective, multicenter, multivendor comparison.
Cury RC; Kitt TM; Feaheny K; Akin J; George RT
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 24314823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Noninvasive anatomical coronary artery imaging versus myocardial perfusion imaging: which confers superior diagnostic and prognostic information?
Hacioglu Y; Gupta M; Budoff MJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(5):637-44. PubMed ID: 20861763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Advances in Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography: Hardware, Software, and Myocardial Flow Reserve.
Ruddy TD; Kadoya Y; Tavoosi A; Small GR; Wells RG
Cardiol Clin; 2023 May; 41(2):117-127. PubMed ID: 37003670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
