These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25264667)

  • 21. An electromyographic comparison of a modified version of the plank with a long lever and posterior tilt versus the traditional plank exercise.
    Schoenfeld BJ; Contreras B; Tiryaki-Sonmez G; Willardson JM; Fontana F
    Sports Biomech; 2014 Sep; 13(3):296-306. PubMed ID: 25325773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An electromyographical comparison of trunk muscle activity during isometric trunk and dynamic strengthening exercises.
    Comfort P; Pearson SJ; Mather D
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Jan; 25(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 21157393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Core Muscle Activation in One-Armed and Two-Armed Kettlebell Swing.
    Andersen V; Fimland MS; Gunnarskog A; Jungård GA; Slåttland RA; Vraalsen ØF; Saeterbakken AH
    J Strength Cond Res; 2016 May; 30(5):1196-204. PubMed ID: 26473519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Magnitudes of muscle activation of spine stabilizers in healthy adults during prone on elbow planking exercises with and without a fitness ball.
    Youdas JW; Coleman KC; Holstad EE; Long SD; Veldkamp NL; Hollman JH
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2018 Mar; 34(3):212-222. PubMed ID: 28922049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Trunk muscle activation levels during eight stabilization exercises used in the functional kinetics concept: A controlled laboratory study.
    Horsak B; Wunsch R; Bernhart P; Gorgas AM; Bichler R; Lampel K
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2017; 30(3):497-508. PubMed ID: 28505963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of Abshaper and conventionally performed abdominal exercises using surface electromyography.
    Warden SJ; Wajswelner H; Bennell KL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1999 Nov; 31(11):1656-64. PubMed ID: 10589871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Trunk muscle activation in prone plank exercises with different body tilts.
    Moreno-Navarro P; Sabido R; Barbado D; Prat-Luri A; Vera-Garcia FJ
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2024; 37(3):743-750. PubMed ID: 38217576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of Traditional vs. Modified Bent-Knee Sit-Up on Abdominal and Hip Flexor Muscle Electromyographic Activity.
    Sullivan W; Gardin FA; Bellon CR; Leigh S
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Dec; 29(12):3472-9. PubMed ID: 25970493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Muscle Activity of Abdominal and Back Muscles during Six Starting Positions in Untrained Individuals.
    Sakulsriprasert P; Eak-udchariya P; Jalayondeja W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2015 Jun; 98 Suppl 5():S125-30. PubMed ID: 26387423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of modified bridge exercise on trunk muscle activity in healthy adults: a cross sectional study.
    Yoon JO; Kang MH; Kim JS; Oh JS
    Braz J Phys Ther; 2018; 22(2):161-167. PubMed ID: 28943402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Core Muscle Activation With Foam Rolling and Static Planks.
    Zahiri A; Alizadeh S; Daneshjoo A; Pike N; Konrad A; Behm DG
    Front Physiol; 2022; 13():852094. PubMed ID: 35370773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Lower-limb and trunk muscle activation with back squats and weighted sled apparatus.
    Maddigan ME; Button DC; Behm DG
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Dec; 28(12):3346-53. PubMed ID: 25226330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of the Electromyographic Activity of the Trunk and Rectus Femoris Muscles During Traditional Crunch and Exercise Using the 5-Minute Shaper Device.
    Silva FHO; Arantes FJ; Gregorio FC; Santos FRA; Fidale TM; Bérzin F; Bigaton DR; Lizardo FB
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Jan; 34(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 31373978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Trunk muscle activity in healthy subjects during bridging stabilization exercises.
    Stevens VK; Bouche KG; Mahieu NN; Coorevits PL; Vanderstraeten GG; Danneels LA
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2006 Sep; 7():75. PubMed ID: 16987410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of integrating hip movements into bridge exercises on electromyographic activities of selected trunk muscles in healthy individuals.
    Park HJ; Oh DW; Kim SY
    Man Ther; 2014 Jun; 19(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 24290206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Trunk muscle activation during dynamic weight-training exercises and isometric instability activities.
    Hamlyn N; Behm DG; Young WB
    J Strength Cond Res; 2007 Nov; 21(4):1108-12. PubMed ID: 18076231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of trunk muscle activation: Ab Circle vs. traditional modalities.
    Willardson JM; Behm DG; Huang SY; Rehg MD; Kattenbraker MS; Fontana FE
    J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Dec; 24(12):3415-21. PubMed ID: 21088552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Electromyographic and kinetic comparison of the back squat and overhead squat.
    Aspe RR; Swinton PA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Oct; 28(10):2827-36. PubMed ID: 24662228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Peak and average rectified EMG measures: which method of data reduction should be used for assessing core training exercises?
    Hibbs AE; Thompson KG; French DN; Hodgson D; Spears IR
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2011 Feb; 21(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 20655245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Which trunk exercise most effectively activates abdominal muscles? A comparative study of plank and isometric bilateral leg raise exercises.
    Park DJ; Park SY
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2019; 32(5):797-802. PubMed ID: 30856100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.