BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25266970)

  • 1. Evaluation of the reproducibility of the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale score in published case reports.
    Liang R; Borgundvaag B; McIntyre M; Thwaites C; Ragan K; Wyllie A
    Pharmacotherapy; 2014 Nov; 34(11):1159-66. PubMed ID: 25266970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of naranjo adverse drug reactions probability scale in causality assessment of drug-induced liver injury.
    García-Cortés M; Lucena MI; Pachkoria K; Borraz Y; Hidalgo R; Andrade RJ;
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 May; 27(9):780-9. PubMed ID: 18284654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of WHO-UMC and Naranjo Scales for Causality Assessment of Reported Adverse Drug Reactions.
    Pandit S; Soni D; Krishnamurthy B; Belhekar MN
    J Patient Saf; 2024 Jun; 20(4):236-239. PubMed ID: 38345209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are the Naranjo criteria reliable and valid for determination of adverse drug reactions in the intensive care unit?
    Kane-Gill SL; Kirisci L; Pathak DS
    Ann Pharmacother; 2005 Nov; 39(11):1823-7. PubMed ID: 16204392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Functional Movement Screen: a reliability study.
    Teyhen DS; Shaffer SW; Lorenson CL; Halfpap JP; Donofry DF; Walker MJ; Dugan JL; Childs JD
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2012 Jun; 42(6):530-40. PubMed ID: 22585621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interrater agreement of two adverse drug reaction causality assessment methods: A randomised comparison of the Liverpool Adverse Drug Reaction Causality Assessment Tool and the World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre system.
    Mouton JP; Mehta U; Rossiter DP; Maartens G; Cohen K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172830. PubMed ID: 28235001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy and reproducibility of two scales in causality assessment of unexpected hepatotoxicity.
    Miljkovic MM; Dobric S; Dragojevic-Simic V
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2012 Apr; 37(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 21718339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two recently published algorithms for assessing the probability of adverse drug reactions.
    Busto U; Naranjo CA; Sellers EM
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 1982 Feb; 13(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 7059419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of Internet Social Networks using Net scoring Tool: A Case Study in Adverse Drug Reaction Mining.
    Katsahian S; Simond Moreau E; Leprovost D; Lardon J; Bousquet C; Kerdelhué G; Abdellaoui R; Texier N; Burgun A; Boussadi A; Faviez C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():526-30. PubMed ID: 25991203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A quantitative approach of using genetic algorithm in designing a probability scoring system of an adverse drug reaction assessment system.
    Koh Y; Yap CW; Li SC
    Int J Med Inform; 2008 Jun; 77(6):421-30. PubMed ID: 17921048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of case reports of adverse drug reactions with psychotropic drugs: a 25-year review.
    Talat B; Mayers A; Baldwin DS
    Hum Psychopharmacol; 2013 Sep; 28(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 23754771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A review and assessment of drug-induced parotitis.
    Brooks KG; Thompson DF
    Ann Pharmacother; 2012 Dec; 46(12):1688-99. PubMed ID: 23249870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A targeted method for standardized assessment of adverse drug events in surgical patients.
    de Boer M; Kiewiet JJ; Boeker EB; Ramrattan MA; Dijkgraaf MG; Lie-A-Huen L; Boermeester MA;
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Dec; 19(6):1073-82. PubMed ID: 23593984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Agreement between WHO-UMC causality scale and the Naranjo algorithm for causality assessment of adverse drug reactions.
    Shukla AK; Jhaj R; Misra S; Ahmed SN; Nanda M; Chaudhary D
    J Family Med Prim Care; 2021 Sep; 10(9):3303-3308. PubMed ID: 34760748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of the Liverpool Adverse Drug Reaction Avoidability Assessment Tool.
    Bracken LE; Nunn AJ; Kirkham JJ; Peak M; Arnott J; Smyth RL; Pirmohamed M; Turner MA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169393. PubMed ID: 28046035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Agreement of expert judgment in causality assessment of adverse drug reactions.
    Arimone Y; Bégaud B; Miremont-Salamé G; Fourrier-Réglat A; Moore N; Molimard M; Haramburu F
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2005 May; 61(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 15827761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MOdified NARanjo Causality Scale for ICSRs (MONARCSi): A Decision Support Tool for Safety Scientists.
    Comfort S; Dorrell D; Meireis S; Fine J
    Drug Saf; 2018 Nov; 41(11):1073-1085. PubMed ID: 29876835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the Bayesian approach and a simple algorithm for assessment of adverse drug events.
    Lanctôt KL; Naranjo CA
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1995 Dec; 58(6):692-8. PubMed ID: 8529335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability and reproducibility of subaxial cervical injury description system: a standardized nomenclature schema.
    Bono CM; Schoenfeld A; Gupta G; Harrop JS; Anderson P; Patel AA; Dimar J; Aarabi B; Dailey A; Vaccaro AR; Gahr R; Shaffrey C; Anderson DG; Rampersaud R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Aug; 36(17):E1140-4. PubMed ID: 21587109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality evaluation of JAMA Patient Pages on diabetes using the Ensuring Quality Information for Patient (EQIP) tool.
    Vaona A; Marcon A; Rava M; Buzzetti R; Sartori M; Abbinante C; Moser A; Seddaiu A; Prontera M; Quaglio A; Pallazzoni P; Sartori V; Rigon G
    Prim Care Diabetes; 2011 Dec; 5(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 21917537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.