141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25267453)
1. Detection of progressive idiopathic scoliosis during growth using back surface topography: a prospective study of 100 patients.
De Korvin G; Randriaminahisoa T; Cugy E; Cheze L; de Sèze M
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2014 Dec; 57(9-10):629-39. PubMed ID: 25267453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Raster stereography versus radiography in the long-term follow-up of idiopathic scoliosis.
Schulte TL; Hierholzer E; Boerke A; Lerner T; Liljenqvist U; Bullmann V; Hackenberg L
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 18418132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identifying the best surface topography parameters for detecting idiopathic scoliosis curve progression.
Parent EC; Damaraju S; Hill DL; Lou E; Smetaniuk D
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 158():78-82. PubMed ID: 20543404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Cobb angles in idiopathic scoliosis on standing radiographs and supine axially loaded MRI.
Wessberg P; Danielson BI; Willén J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(26):3039-44. PubMed ID: 17173001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity of a quantitative clinical measurement tool of trunk posture in idiopathic scoliosis.
Fortin C; Feldman DE; Cheriet F; Labelle H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E988-94. PubMed ID: 20700086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantification of topographic changes in the surface of back of young patients monitored for idiopathic scoliosis: correlation with radiographic variables.
Pino-Almero L; Mínguez-Rey MF; Sentamans-Segarra S; Salvador-Palmer MR; Anda RM; La O JL
J Biomed Opt; 2016 Nov; 21(11):116001. PubMed ID: 27802477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discriminative and predictive validity of the scoliosis research society-22 questionnaire in management and curve-severity subgroups of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.
Parent EC; Hill D; Mahood J; Moreau M; Raso J; Lou E
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):2450-7. PubMed ID: 19829260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation between Topographic Parameters Obtained by Back Surface Topography Based on Structured Light and Radiographic Variables in the Assessment of Back Morphology in Young Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis.
Pino-Almero L; Mínguez-Rey MF; Cibrián-Ortiz de Anda RM; Salvador-Palmer MR; Sentamans-Segarra S
Asian Spine J; 2017 Apr; 11(2):219-229. PubMed ID: 28443166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early detection of progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by measurement of changes in back shape with the Integrated Shape Imaging System scanner.
Theologis TN; Fairbank JC; Turner-Smith AR; Pantazopoulos T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Jun; 22(11):1223-7; discussion 1228. PubMed ID: 9201860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis: follow-up study to skeletal maturity.
Tan KJ; Moe MM; Vaithinathan R; Wong HK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(7):697-700. PubMed ID: 19333102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spinal deformity and back surface asymmetry in idiopathic scoliosis.
Stokes IA; Armstrong JG; Moreland MS
J Orthop Res; 1988; 6(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 3334733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of photogrammetry for detecting adolescent idiopathic scoliosis progression.
Leal JS; Aroeira RMC; Gressler V; Greco M; Pertence AEM; Lamounier JA
Spine J; 2019 Feb; 19(2):321-329. PubMed ID: 30661515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical application of back surface topography by means of structured light in the screening of idiopathic scoliosis.
Pino-Almero L; Mínguez-Rey MF; Rodríguez-Martínez D; Cibrián-Ortiz de Anda RM; Salvador-Palmer MR; Sentamans-Segarra S
J Pediatr Orthop B; 2017 Jan; 26(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 27509484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surface topography, Cobb angles, and cosmetic change in scoliosis.
Goldberg CJ; Kaliszer M; Moore DP; Fogarty EE; Dowling FE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Feb; 26(4):E55-63. PubMed ID: 11224901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adult scoliosis: a health assessment analysis by SF-36.
Schwab F; Dubey A; Pagala M; Gamez L; Farcy JP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):602-6. PubMed ID: 12642769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ten-year follow-up evaluation of a school screening program for scoliosis. Is the forward-bending test an accurate diagnostic criterion for the screening of scoliosis?
Karachalios T; Sofianos J; Roidis N; Sapkas G; Korres D; Nikolopoulos K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Nov; 24(22):2318-24. PubMed ID: 10586455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inter-observer reproducibility of back surface topography parameters allowing assessment of scoliotic thoracic gibbosity and comparison with two standard postures.
de Sèze M; Randriaminahisoa T; Gaunelle A; de Korvin G; Mazaux JM
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2013 Dec; 56(9-10):599-612. PubMed ID: 24238970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation of spinal deformity in scoliosis from torso surface cross sections.
Jaremko JL; Poncet P; Ronsky J; Harder J; Dansereau J; Labelle H; Zernicke RF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jul; 26(14):1583-91. PubMed ID: 11462091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Changhai fulcrum bending radiographic technique to assess curve flexibility in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis].
Wang F; Li J; Chen Z; Wu H; Li B; He X; Wei X; Yi H; Wang C; Bai Y; Zhu X; Li M
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 May; 52(5):355-60. PubMed ID: 25034743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of a functional classification system in the monitoring of patients with idiopathic scoliosis.
Klos SS; Liu XC; Lyon RM; Tassone JC; Thometz JG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):1662-6. PubMed ID: 17621215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
