These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2526855)
61. Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. Van Orden GC; Johnston JC; Hale BL J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Jul; 14(3):371-86. PubMed ID: 2969938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task? Perea M; Rosa E; Gómez C Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 11958353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Lexical factors in the word-superiority effect. Hildebrandt N; Caplan D; Sokol S; Torreano L Mem Cognit; 1995 Jan; 23(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 7885263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Lexical access and selection of contextually appropriate meaning for ambiguous words. Ihara A; Hayakawa T; Wei Q; Munetsuna S; Fujimaki N Neuroimage; 2007 Nov; 38(3):576-88. PubMed ID: 17888689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Beyond binary judgments: prime validity modulates masked repetition priming in the naming task. Bodner GE; Masson ME Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 15078039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. On the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision: evidence for opposing interactive influences revealed by RT distributional analyses. Yap MJ; Balota DA; Tse CS; Besner D J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):495-513. PubMed ID: 18444751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Masked nonword repetition effects in yes/no and go/no-go lexical decision: a test of the evidence accumulation and deadline accounts. Perea M; Gómez P; Fraga I Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Jun; 17(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 20551360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Reduction in alphabet priming with delay and degradation. Lukatela G; Lukatela K; Carello C; Turvey MT J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1993 Sep; 19(5):1094-100. PubMed ID: 8409849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Processing phonological and semantic ambiguity: evidence from semantic priming at different SOAs. Frost R; Bentin S J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Jan; 18(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 1532022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Hemispheric contributions to lexical ambiguity resolution in a discourse context: evidence from individuals with unilateral left and right hemisphere lesions. Grindrod CM; Baum SR Brain Cogn; 2005 Feb; 57(1):70-83. PubMed ID: 15629218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Impairments of lexical-semantic processing in aphasia: evidence from the processing of lexical ambiguities. Hagoort P Brain Lang; 1993 Aug; 45(2):189-232. PubMed ID: 8358597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Listeners and readers generalize their experience with word meanings across modalities. Gilbert RA; Davis MH; Gaskell MG; Rodd JM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1533-1561. PubMed ID: 29389181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Effects of syntactic category assignment on lexical ambiguity resolution in reading: an eye movement analysis. Folk JR; Morris RK Mem Cognit; 2003 Jan; 31(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 12699146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Phonological assembly in reading: lexical contribution leads to violation of graphophonological rules. Peereman R Mem Cognit; 1991 Nov; 19(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 1758303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]