BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25269473)

  • 1. Semantic transparency in free stems: The effect of Orthography-Semantics Consistency on word recognition.
    Marelli M; Amenta S; Crepaldi D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1571-83. PubMed ID: 25269473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A database of orthography-semantics consistency (OSC) estimates for 15,017 English words.
    Marelli M; Amenta S
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1482-1495. PubMed ID: 29372490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From sound to meaning: Phonology-to-Semantics mapping in visual word recognition.
    Amenta S; Marelli M; Sulpizio S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):887-893. PubMed ID: 27572870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interplay of orthography and semantics in reading: an event-related potential study.
    Martin CD; Thierry G
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(15):1501-5. PubMed ID: 18797306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: a violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition.
    Feldman LB; O'Connor PA; Del Prado Martín FM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Aug; 16(4):684-91. PubMed ID: 19648453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Effects of the lexical-semantic variables in visual word recognition].
    Alija M; Cuetos F
    Psicothema; 2006 Aug; 18(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 17296076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The fruitless effort of growing a fruitless tree: Early morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic effects in sentence reading.
    Amenta S; Marelli M; Crepaldi D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1587-96. PubMed ID: 25664370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Very early and late form-to-meaning computations during visual word recognition as revealed by electrophysiology.
    Sulpizio S; Arcara G; Lago S; Marelli M; Amenta S
    Cortex; 2022 Dec; 157():167-193. PubMed ID: 36327746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks.
    Pexman PM; Lupker SJ; Hino Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Sep; 9(3):542-9. PubMed ID: 12412895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: the case of prefixed words.
    Diependaele K; Sandra D; Grainger J
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Sep; 37(6):895-908. PubMed ID: 19679868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of semantic transparency in visual word recognition of compound words: A megastudy approach.
    Kim SY; Yap MJ; Goh WD
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Dec; 51(6):2722-2732. PubMed ID: 30291593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of semantic transparency on the processing of morphologically derived words: Evidence from decision latencies and event-related potentials.
    Jared D; Jouravlev O; Joanisse MF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Mar; 43(3):422-450. PubMed ID: 27685020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Associative priming effects with visible, transposed-letter nonwords: JUGDE facilitates COURT.
    Perea M; Palti D; Gomez P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Apr; 74(3):481-8. PubMed ID: 22274995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning to spell in a language with transparent orthography: Distributional properties of orthography and whole-word lexical processing.
    Angelelli P; Marinelli CV; Putzolu A; Notarnicola A; Iaia M; Burani C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Mar; 71(3):704-716. PubMed ID: 28052739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does frequency trajectory influence word identification? A cross-task comparison.
    Lété B; Bonin P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(5):973-1000. PubMed ID: 23030693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semantic and phonological influences on visual word learning in a transparent language.
    Suárez-Coalla P; Cuetos F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):772-781. PubMed ID: 27022670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What do graded effects of semantic transparency reveal about morphological processing?
    Feldman LB; Soltano EG; Pastizzo MJ; Francis SE
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):17-30. PubMed ID: 15172521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of two-character Chinese compound words: A megastudy analysis.
    Tse CS; Yap MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Sep; 71(9):2022-2038. PubMed ID: 30117382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of semantic and phonological factors in word recognition: an ERP cross-modal priming study of derivational morphology.
    Kielar A; Joanisse MF
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(2):161-77. PubMed ID: 21129390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics.
    Hino Y; Lupker SJ; Pexman PM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):686-713. PubMed ID: 12109762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.