These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25269778)

  • 1. Application of information theory to a three-body coarse-grained representation of proteins in the PDB: insights into the structural and evolutionary roles of residues in protein structure.
    Thompson JJ; Tabatabaei Ghomi H; Lill MA
    Proteins; 2014 Dec; 82(12):3450-65. PubMed ID: 25269778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protein meta-functional signatures from combining sequence, structure, evolution, and amino acid property information.
    Wang K; Horst JA; Cheng G; Nickle DC; Samudrala R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2008 Sep; 4(9):e1000181. PubMed ID: 18818722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SMpred: a support vector machine approach to identify structural motifs in protein structure without using evolutionary information.
    Pugalenthi G; Kandaswamy KK; Suganthan PN; Sowdhamini R; Martinetz T; Kolatkar PR
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2010 Dec; 28(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 20919755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intrinsic disorder in the Protein Data Bank.
    Le Gall T; Romero PR; Cortese MS; Uversky VN; Dunker AK
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2007 Feb; 24(4):325-42. PubMed ID: 17206849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distance-dependent classification of amino acids by information theory.
    Pape S; Hoffgaard F; Hamacher K
    Proteins; 2010 Aug; 78(10):2322-8. PubMed ID: 20544967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Thermodynamic database for proteins: features and applications.
    Gromiha MM; Sarai A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 609():97-112. PubMed ID: 20221915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effective connectivity profile: a structural representation that evidences the relationship between protein structures and sequences.
    Bastolla U; Ortíz AR; Porto M; Teichert F
    Proteins; 2008 Dec; 73(4):872-88. PubMed ID: 18536008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The ConSurf-HSSP database: the mapping of evolutionary conservation among homologs onto PDB structures.
    Glaser F; Rosenberg Y; Kessel A; Pupko T; Ben-Tal N
    Proteins; 2005 Feb; 58(3):610-7. PubMed ID: 15614759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. III. A comparative study of sequence conservation in protein structural families using multiple structural alignments.
    Yang AS; Honig B
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Aug; 301(3):691-711. PubMed ID: 10966778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation performance of substitution matrices, based on contacts between residue terminal groups.
    Vishnepolsky B; Managadze G; Grigolava M; Pirtskhalava M
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2012; 30(2):180-90. PubMed ID: 22702729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oligomerisation status and evolutionary conservation of interfaces of protein structural domain superfamilies.
    Sukhwal A; Sowdhamini R
    Mol Biosyst; 2013 Jul; 9(7):1652-61. PubMed ID: 23532342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A protein evolution model with independent sites that reproduces site-specific amino acid distributions from the Protein Data Bank.
    Bastolla U; Porto M; Roman HE; Vendruscolo M
    BMC Evol Biol; 2006 May; 6():43. PubMed ID: 16737532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. RNABindR: a server for analyzing and predicting RNA-binding sites in proteins.
    Terribilini M; Sander JD; Lee JH; Zaback P; Jernigan RL; Honavar V; Dobbs D
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2007 Jul; 35(Web Server issue):W578-84. PubMed ID: 17483510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Amino acid pair interchanges at spatially conserved locations.
    Naor D; Fischer D; Jernigan RL; Wolfson HJ; Nussinov R
    J Mol Biol; 1996 Mar; 256(5):924-38. PubMed ID: 8601843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coarse- and fine-grained models for proteins: evaluation by decoy discrimination.
    Kauffman C; Karypis G
    Proteins; 2013 May; 81(5):754-73. PubMed ID: 23184763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conserved residue clustering and protein structure prediction.
    Schueler-Furman O; Baker D
    Proteins; 2003 Aug; 52(2):225-35. PubMed ID: 12833546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Satisfaction of hydrogen-bonding potential influences the conservation of polar sidechains.
    Worth CL; Blundell TL
    Proteins; 2009 May; 75(2):413-29. PubMed ID: 18837037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of residue conformations in peptides in Cambridge structural database and protein-peptide structural complexes.
    Raghavender US
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2017 Mar; 89(3):428-442. PubMed ID: 27589215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative analysis of the packing topology of structurally important residues in helical membrane and soluble proteins.
    Pabuwal V; Li Z
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2009 Feb; 22(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 19054790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A method for protein accessibility prediction based on residue types and conformational states.
    Zarei R; Arab S; Sadeghi M
    Comput Biol Chem; 2007 Oct; 31(5-6):384-8. PubMed ID: 17888743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.