241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25269854)
1. Efficacy of olopatadine versus epinastine for treating allergic conjunctivitis caused by Japanese cedar pollen: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Fukushima A; Ebihara N
Adv Ther; 2014 Oct; 31(10):1045-58. PubMed ID: 25269854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical efficacy of olopatadine vs epinastine ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Lanier BQ; Finegold I; D'Arienzo P; Granet D; Epstein AB; Ledgerwood GL
Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Aug; 20(8):1227-33. PubMed ID: 15324525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of epinastine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution in allergic conjunctivitis by conjunctival cedar pollen allergen challenge.
Fujishima H; Ohashi Y; Takamura E
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2014 Oct; 113(4):476-81. PubMed ID: 25163405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy and comfort of olopatadine 0.2% versus epinastine 0.05% ophthalmic solution for treating itching and redness induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
Mah FS; Rosenwasser LJ; Townsend WD; Greiner JV; Bensch G
Curr Med Res Opin; 2007 Jun; 23(6):1445-52. PubMed ID: 17559743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the efficacy of epinastine ophthalmic solution using a conjunctivitis allergen challenge model in patients with birch pollen allergic conjunctivitis.
Tagawa Y; Namba K; Nakazono Y; Iwata D; Ishida S
Allergol Int; 2017 Apr; 66(2):338-343. PubMed ID: 27720602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Alcaftadine 0.25% versus Olopatadine 0.1% in Preventing Cedar Pollen Allergic Conjunctivitis in Japan: A Randomized Study.
Nakatani H; Gomes P; Bradford R; Guo Q; Safyan E; Hollander DA
Ocul Immunol Inflamm; 2019; 27(4):622-631. PubMed ID: 29543548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ocular itch relief with alcaftadine 0.25% versus olopatadine 0.2% in allergic conjunctivitis: pooled analysis of two multicenter randomized clinical trials.
McLaurin EB; Marsico NP; Ackerman SL; Ciolino JB; Williams JM; Villanueva L; Hollander DA
Adv Ther; 2014 Oct; 31(10):1059-71. PubMed ID: 25260889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of Alcaftadine 0.25% (AGN-229666) for Once-daily Prevention of Cedar-Pollen Allergic Conjunctivitis: A Phase 3 Randomized Study.
Fujishima H; Hasunuma T; Kawakita T; Sekiya T; Gomes P; Hollander DA
Ocul Immunol Inflamm; 2021 Nov; 29(7-8):1621-1626. PubMed ID: 32501774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized, double-masked comparison of olopatadine ophthalmic solution, mometasone furoate monohydrate nasal spray, and fexofenadine hydrochloride tablets using the conjunctival and nasal allergen challenge models.
Spangler DL; Abelson MB; Ober A; Gotnes PJ
Clin Ther; 2003 Aug; 25(8):2245-67. PubMed ID: 14512132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy and tolerability of ophthalmic epinastine assessed using the conjunctival antigen challenge model in patients with a history of allergic conjunctivitis.
Abelson MB; Gomes P; Crampton HJ; Schiffman RM; Bradford RR; Whitcup SM
Clin Ther; 2004 Jan; 26(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 14996516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative evaluation of olopatadine ophthalmic solution (0.1%) versus ketorolac ophthalmic solution (0.5%) using the provocative antigen challenge model.
Deschenes J; Discepola M; Abelson M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 1999; (228):47-52. PubMed ID: 10337433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phase 3 Randomized Double-Masked Study of Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily 0.77% Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Allergic Conjunctivitis Using the Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model.
McLaurin E; Narvekar A; Gomes P; Adewale A; Torkildsen G
Cornea; 2015 Oct; 34(10):1245-51. PubMed ID: 26266427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and tolerability of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and loteprednol etabonate 0.2% ophthalmic suspension in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Berdy GJ; Stoppel JO; Epstein AB
Clin Ther; 2002 Jun; 24(6):918-29. PubMed ID: 12117082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy and tolerability of ophthalmic epinastine: a randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, active- and vehicle-controlled environmental trial in patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
Whitcup SM; Bradford R; Lue J; Schiffman RM; Abelson MB
Clin Ther; 2004 Jan; 26(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 14996515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and azelastine hydrochloride 0.05% ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Spangler DL; Bensch G; Berdy GJ
Clin Ther; 2001 Aug; 23(8):1272-80. PubMed ID: 11558863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative efficacy of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus levocabastine 0.05% ophthalmic suspension using the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Abelson MB; Greiner JV
Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Dec; 20(12):1953-8. PubMed ID: 15701212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Time to onset and duration of action of the antihistamine bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solutions 1.0% and 1.5% in allergic conjunctivitis: a phase III, single-center, prospective, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, conjunctival allergen challenge assessment in adults and children.
Abelson MB; Torkildsen GL; Williams JI; Gow JA; Gomes PJ; McNamara TR;
Clin Ther; 2009 Sep; 31(9):1908-21. PubMed ID: 19843481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combined analysis of two studies using the conjunctival allergen challenge model to evaluate olopatadine hydrochloride, a new ophthalmic antiallergic agent with dual activity.
Abelson MB; Spitalny L
Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jun; 125(6):797-804. PubMed ID: 9645717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus placebo for controlling the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis and rhinoconjunctivitis.
Abelson MB; Turner D
Clin Ther; 2003 Mar; 25(3):931-47. PubMed ID: 12852709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the clinical efficacy of pheniramine maleate/naphazoline hydrochloride ophthalmic solution and olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Greiner JV; Udell IJ
Clin Ther; 2005 May; 27(5):568-77. PubMed ID: 15978305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
