BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25269918)

  • 1. Role of non-contrast balanced steady-state free precession megnetic resonance angiography compared to contrast-enhanced megnetic resonance angiography in diagnosing renal artery stenosis: a meta-analysis.
    Tao W; Shen Y; Guo L; Bo G
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(19):3483-90. PubMed ID: 25269918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Non-enhanced MR angiography of renal arteries: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Angeretti MG; Lumia D; Canì A; Barresi M; Nocchi Cardim L; Piacentino F; Maresca AM; Novario R; Genovese EA; Fugazzola C
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Sep; 54(7):749-56. PubMed ID: 23550187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Steady-state free precession MRA of the renal arteries: breath-hold and navigator-gated techniques vs. CE-MRA.
    Maki JH; Wilson GJ; Eubank WB; Glickerman DJ; Pipavath S; Hoogeveen RM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):966-73. PubMed ID: 17896351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Renal artery assessment with nonenhanced steady-state free precession versus contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Wyttenbach R; Braghetti A; Wyss M; Alerci M; Briner L; Santini P; Cozzi L; Di Valentino M; Katoh M; Marone C; Vock P; Gallino A
    Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):186-95. PubMed ID: 17717326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Non-contrast renal artery MRA using an inflow inversion recovery steady state free precession technique (Inhance): comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced MRA.
    Glockner JF; Takahashi N; Kawashima A; Woodrum DA; Stanley DW; Takei N; Miyoshi M; Sun W
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1411-8. PubMed ID: 20512894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An international multicenter comparison of time-SLIP unenhanced MR angiography and contrast-enhanced CT angiography for assessing renal artery stenosis: the renal artery contrast-free trial.
    Albert TS; Akahane M; Parienty I; Yellin N; Catalá V; Alomar X; Prot A; Tomizawa N; Xue H; Katabathina VS; Lopera JE; Jin Z
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):182-8. PubMed ID: 25539255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-resolution 3D unenhanced ECG-gated respiratory-navigated MR angiography of the renal arteries: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Mohrs OK; Petersen SE; Schulze T; Zieschang M; Küx H; Schmitt P; Bergemann S; Kauczor HU
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1423-8. PubMed ID: 21098205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography and stenosis quantification].
    Marchand B; Hernandez-Hoyos M; Orkisz M; Douek P
    J Mal Vasc; 2000 Dec; 25(5):312-320. PubMed ID: 11148391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Navigator-gated MR angiography of the renal arteries: a potential screening tool for renal artery stenosis.
    Maki JH; Wilson GJ; Eubank WB; Glickerman DJ; Millan JA; Hoogeveen RM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jun; 188(6):W540-6. PubMed ID: 17515344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Renal artery stenosis evaluation in chronic kidney disease patients: nonenhanced time-spatial labeling inversion-pulse three-dimensional MR angiography with regulated breathing versus DSA.
    Parienty I; Rostoker G; Jouniaux F; Piotin M; Admiraal-Behloul F; Miyazaki M
    Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):592-601. PubMed ID: 21330564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stenosis detection in forearm hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulae by multiphase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: preliminary experience.
    Planken RN; Tordoir JH; Dammers R; de Haan MW; Oei TK; van der Sande FM; van Engelshoven JM; Leiner T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jan; 17(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 12500274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noncontrast 3D steady-state free-precession magnetic resonance angiography of the whole chest using nonselective radiofrequency excitation over a large field of view: comparison with single-phase 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.
    Krishnam MS; Tomasian A; Deshpande V; Tran L; Laub G; Finn JP; Ruehm SG
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):411-20. PubMed ID: 18496046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomographic angiography and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant transplant renal artery stenosis.
    Gaddikeri S; Mitsumori L; Vaidya S; Hippe DS; Bhargava P; Dighe MK
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2014; 43(4):162-8. PubMed ID: 24948209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic accuracy of computer tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography in the stenosis detection of autologuous hemodialysis access: a meta-analysis.
    Li B; Li Q; Chen C; Guan Y; Liu S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e78409. PubMed ID: 24194928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-contrast MR angiography versus contrast enhanced MR angiography for detection of renal artery stenosis: a comparative analysis in 400 renal arteries.
    Lal H; Singh RKR; Yadav P; Yadav A; Bhadauria D; Singh A
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 May; 46(5):2064-2071. PubMed ID: 33136181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-contrast-enhanced MRA of renal artery stenosis: validation against DSA in a porcine model.
    Bley TA; François CJ; Schiebler ML; Wieben O; Takei N; Brittain JH; Del Rio AM; Grist TM; Reeder SB
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Feb; 26(2):547-55. PubMed ID: 26017736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Renal artery stenosis: comparative assessment by unenhanced renal artery MRA versus contrast-enhanced MRA.
    Khoo MM; Deeab D; Gedroyc WM; Duncan N; Taube D; Dick EA
    Eur Radiol; 2011 Jul; 21(7):1470-6. PubMed ID: 21337034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unenhanced respiratory-gated magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of renal artery in hypertensive patients using true fast imaging with steady-state precession technique compared with contrast-enhanced MRA.
    Zhang W; Lin J; Wang S; Lv P; Wang L; Liu H; Chen C; Zeng M
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(5):700-4. PubMed ID: 24733000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance versus computed tomography angiography for renal artery stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang L; Zhu L; Li G; Zhang Y; Jiang Y; Shui B; Zhang X
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2021 May; 120(5):1171-1178. PubMed ID: 33583703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Diagnostic accuracy of artery peak velocity variation measured by bedside real-time ultrasound for prediction of fluid responsiveness: a Meta-analysis].
    Pei Y; Yang Y; Feng Y; He S; Zhou J; Jiang H; Wang X
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2020 Jan; 32(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 32148240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.