277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25270225)
1. Evaluating multiplexed next-generation sequencing as a method in palynology for mixed pollen samples.
Keller A; Danner N; Grimmer G; Ankenbrand M; von der Ohe K; von der Ohe W; Rost S; Härtel S; Steffan-Dewenter I
Plant Biol (Stuttg); 2015 Mar; 17(2):558-66. PubMed ID: 25270225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Increased efficiency in identifying mixed pollen samples by meta-barcoding with a dual-indexing approach.
Sickel W; Ankenbrand MJ; Grimmer G; Holzschuh A; Härtel S; Lanzen J; Steffan-Dewenter I; Keller A
BMC Ecol; 2015 Jul; 15():20. PubMed ID: 26194794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comparison of Honey Bee-Collected Pollen From Working Agricultural Lands Using Light Microscopy and ITS Metabarcoding.
Smart MD; Cornman RS; Iwanowicz DD; McDermott-Kubeczko M; Pettis JS; Spivak MS; Otto CR
Environ Entomol; 2017 Feb; 46(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 28062536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Taxonomic Characterization of Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Pollen Foraging Based on Non-Overlapping Paired-End Sequencing of Nuclear Ribosomal Loci.
Cornman RS; Otto CR; Iwanowicz D; Pettis JS
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145365. PubMed ID: 26700168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pollen DNA barcoding: current applications and future prospects.
Bell KL; de Vere N; Keller A; Richardson RT; Gous A; Burgess KS; Brosi BJ
Genome; 2016 Sep; 59(9):629-40. PubMed ID: 27322652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Review and future prospects for DNA barcoding methods in forensic palynology.
Bell KL; Burgess KS; Okamoto KC; Aranda R; Brosi BJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():110-6. PubMed ID: 26751251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficient and sensitive identification and quantification of airborne pollen using next-generation DNA sequencing.
Kraaijeveld K; de Weger LA; Ventayol García M; Buermans H; Frank J; Hiemstra PS; den Dunnen JT
Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 Jan; 15(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 24893805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genome-skimming provides accurate quantification for pollen mixtures.
Lang D; Tang M; Hu J; Zhou X
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Nov; 19(6):1433-1446. PubMed ID: 31325909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Identification of cattail pollen (puhuang), pine pollen (songhuafen) and its adulterants by ITS2 sequence].
Ma XX; Sun W; Ren WC; Xiang L; Zhao B; Zhang YQ; Song M; Mu ZJ; Chen SL
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi; 2014 Jun; 39(12):2189-93. PubMed ID: 25244742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sample Preparation for Fungal Community Analysis by High-Throughput Sequencing of Barcode Amplicons.
Clemmensen KE; Ihrmark K; Durling MB; Lindahl BD
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1399():61-88. PubMed ID: 26791497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Plant-pollinator interactions over time: Pollen metabarcoding from bees in a historic collection.
Gous A; Swanevelder DZH; Eardley CD; Willows-Munro S
Evol Appl; 2019 Feb; 12(2):187-197. PubMed ID: 30697333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pollen foraging behaviour of solitary Hawaiian bees revealed through molecular pollen analysis.
Wilson EE; Sidhu CS; LeVan KE; Holway DA
Mol Ecol; 2010 Nov; 19(21):4823-9. PubMed ID: 20958818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Floral hosts of leaf-cutter bees (Megachilidae) in a biodiversity hotspot revealed by pollen DNA metabarcoding of historic specimens.
Gous A; Eardley CD; Johnson SD; Swanevelder DZH; Willows-Munro S
PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0244973. PubMed ID: 33476342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A validated workflow for rapid taxonomic assignment and monitoring of a national fauna of bees (Apiformes) using high throughput DNA barcoding.
Creedy TJ; Norman H; Tang CQ; Qing Chin K; Andujar C; Arribas P; O'Connor RS; Carvell C; Notton DG; Vogler AP
Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Jan; 20(1):40-53. PubMed ID: 31290224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigating the use of pollen DNA metabarcoding to quantify bee foraging and effects of threshold selection.
Arstingstall KA; DeBano SJ; Li X; Wooster DE; Rowland MM; Burrows S; Frost K
PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0282715. PubMed ID: 37071613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How reliable is metabarcoding for pollen identification? An evaluation of different taxonomic assignment strategies by cross-validation.
San Martin G; Hautier L; Mingeot D; Dubois B
PeerJ; 2024; 12():e16567. PubMed ID: 38313030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What Else Is in Salviae officinalis folium? Comprehensive Species Identification of Plant Raw Material by DNA Metabarcoding.
Schmiderer C; Lukas B; Ruzicka J; Novak J
Planta Med; 2018 Apr; 84(6-07):428-433. PubMed ID: 29165730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An improved high throughput sequencing method for studying oomycete communities.
Sapkota R; Nicolaisen M
J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Mar; 110():33-9. PubMed ID: 25602160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. DNA barcoding detects floral origin of Indian honey samples.
Saravanan M; Mohanapriya G; Laha R; Sathishkumar R
Genome; 2019 May; 62(5):341-348. PubMed ID: 30920312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of pollen and bacterial community composition in brood provisions of a small carpenter bee.
McFrederick QS; Rehan SM
Mol Ecol; 2016 May; 25(10):2302-11. PubMed ID: 26945527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
