These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

738 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25270368)

  • 1. Performance of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography as third-step assessment in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
    Utrilla-Layna J; Alcázar JL; Aubá M; Laparte C; Olartecoechea B; Errasti T; Juez L; Mínguez JÁ; Guerriero S; Jurado M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 25270368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does sphere volume affect the performance of three-dimensional power Doppler virtual vascular sampling for predicting malignancy in vascularized solid or cystic-solid adnexal masses?
    Kudla MJ; Alcázar JL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May; 35(5):602-8. PubMed ID: 20183808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound help in discrimination between benign and malignant ovarian masses?
    Jokubkiene L; Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 29(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 17201017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of two different methods for vascular sampling by three-dimensional power Doppler angiography in solid and cystic-solid adnexal masses.
    Alcázar JL; Prka M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):349-54. PubMed ID: 19199281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vessel morphology depicted by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound as second-stage test in adnexal tumors that are difficult to classify: prospective diagnostic accuracy study.
    Sladkevicius P; Jokubkiene L; Timmerman D; Fischerova D; Van Holsbeke C; Franchi D; Savelli L; Epstein E; Fruscio R; Kaijser J; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Pascual MA; Testa AC; Ameye L; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 57(2):324-334. PubMed ID: 32853459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The use of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional color and power-Doppler in the diagnosis of blood flow indices of adnexal tumors].
    Czekierdowski A; Stachowicz N; Smoleń A; Kotarski J
    Ginekol Pol; 2006 Apr; 77(4):296-306. PubMed ID: 16875035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. External validation of IOTA simple descriptors and simple rules for classifying adnexal masses.
    Alcázar JL; Pascual MA; Graupera B; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana A; Hereter L; Ajossa S; Guerriero S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 48(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 26748432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
    Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective cross-validation of Doppler ultrasound examination and gray-scale ultrasound imaging for discrimination of benign and malignant pelvic masses.
    Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Oct; 14(4):273-83. PubMed ID: 10586480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intravenous contrast ultrasound examination using contrast-tuned imaging (CnTI) and the contrast medium SonoVue for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses with solid components.
    Testa AC; Timmerman D; Van Belle V; Fruscella E; Van Holsbeke C; Savelli L; Ferrazzi E; Leone FP; Marret H; Tranquart F; Exacoustos C; Nazzaro G; Bokor D; Magri F; Van Huffel S; Ferrandina G; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):699-710. PubMed ID: 19924735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of surgically removed adnexal lesions with largest diameter ≤ 2.5 cm: a pictorial essay.
    Di Legge A; Pollastri P; Mancari R; Ludovisi M; Mascilini F; Franchi D; Jurkovic D; Coccia ME; Timmerman D; Scambia G; Testa A; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):648-656. PubMed ID: 28004457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contribution of power Doppler blood flow mapping to gray-scale ultrasound for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses in symptomatic and asymptomatic women.
    Alcázar JL; Guerriero S; Laparte C; Ajossa S; Jurado M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Mar; 155(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 21211896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
    Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional power Doppler vascular sampling: a new method for predicting ovarian cancer in vascularized complex adnexal masses.
    Alcázar JL; Mercé LT; García Manero M
    J Ultrasound Med; 2005 May; 24(5):689-96. PubMed ID: 15840800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Limitations of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography in preoperative evaluation of ovarian tumors.
    Silvestre L; Martins WP; Candido-Dos-Reis FJ
    J Ovarian Res; 2015 Jul; 8():47. PubMed ID: 26219956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intra- and interobserver agreement when describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terms and definitions: a study on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes.
    Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):318-27. PubMed ID: 22915506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler sonography.
    Stein SM; Laifer-Narin S; Johnson MB; Roman LD; Muderspach LI; Tyszka JM; Ralls PW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 7839975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease.
    Salem S; White LM; Lai J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intra- and interobserver variability of 2D and 3D transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of benign versus malignant adnexal masses.
    Pascual MA; Graupera B; Hereter L; Rotili A; Rodriguez I; Alcázar JL
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2011 Jul; 39(6):316-21. PubMed ID: 21500198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional volume off-line analysis as compared to real-time ultrasound for assessing adnexal masses.
    Alcázar JL; Iturra A; Sedda F; Aubá M; Ajossa S; Guerriero S; Jurado M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Mar; 161(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 22197306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.