These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25270493)

  • 1. Hall v. Florida: defining intellectual disability in the shadow of the death penalty.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2014 Oct; 65(10):1186-8. PubMed ID: 25270493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hall v. Florida: Capital Punishment, IQ, and Persons With Intellectual Disabilities.
    Cooke BK; Delalot D; Werner TL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Jun; 43(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 26071514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shifting Diagnostic Systems for Defining Intellectual Disability in Death Penalty Cases: Hall vs. Florida.
    Mukherjee M; Westphal A
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2015 Jul; 45(7):2277-8. PubMed ID: 25663625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating Intellectual Disability after the
    Updegrove AH; Vaughn MS
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Dec; 47(4):486-492. PubMed ID: 31533993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is the death of the death penalty near? The impact of Atkins and Roper on the future of capital punishment for mentally ill defendants.
    Shin H
    Fordham Law Rev; 2007 Oct; 76(1):465-516. PubMed ID: 17985486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Law & psychiatry: mental retardation and the death penalty: after Atkins.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2009 Oct; 60(10):1295-7. PubMed ID: 19797365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Too young to kill? U.S. Supreme Court treads a dangerous path in Roper v. Simmons.
    Sarkar SP
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(3):364-72. PubMed ID: 17872560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revisiting the Decision of Death in Hurst v. Florida.
    Cooke BK; Ginory A; Zedalis J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2016 Dec; 44(4):483-490. PubMed ID: 28003393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In the public interest: intellectual disability, the Supreme Court, and the death penalty.
    Abeles N
    Am Psychol; 2010 Nov; 65(8):743-8. PubMed ID: 21058775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Legacy of
    Steele KL; Orth S
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2021 Dec; 49(4):601-609. PubMed ID: 34764185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Missouri overrules the United States Supreme Court on capital punishment for minors.
    Herbert PB; Meyers JR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(4):443-6. PubMed ID: 15704630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A National Survey of State Legislation defining mental retardation: implications for policy and practice after Atkins.
    DeMatteo D; Marczyk G; Pich M
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(6):781-802. PubMed ID: 18046743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mental retardation and the death penalty: a guide to State Legislative issues.
    Ellis JW
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2003; 27(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 14651033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Some contrarian concerns about law, psychology, and public policy.
    Bersoff DN
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Oct; 26(5):565-74. PubMed ID: 12412498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mental retardation and the death penalty in the USA: the clinical and legal legacy.
    French LA
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2005; 15(2):82-6. PubMed ID: 16470501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The American Psychiatric Association's resource document on mental retardation and capital sentencing: implementing Atkins v. Virginia.
    Bonnie RJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 15515919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing Adaptive Functioning in Death Penalty Cases after Hall and DSM-5.
    Hagan LD; Drogin EY; Guilmette TJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2016 Mar; 44(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 26944749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating Competency for Execution after
    Updegrove AH; Vaughn MS
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2020 Dec; 48(4):530-535. PubMed ID: 32675330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Penry revisited: is execution of a person who has mental retardation cruel and unusual?
    Herbert PB; Young KA
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2):282-6. PubMed ID: 12108566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "Power and Greed and the Corruptible Seed": Mental Disability, Prosecutorial Misconduct, and the Death Penalty.
    Perlin ML
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Sep; 43(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 26438801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.