252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25270771)
1. Clinical verification of the formula of Bennett et al. (1994) of determining the size of retinal features by fundus photography.
Knaapi L; Aarnisalo E; Vesti E; Leinonen MT
Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 May; 93(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 25270771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determining the size of retinal features in prematurely born children by fundus photography.
Knaapi L; Lehtonen T; Vesti E; Leinonen MT
Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 Jun; 93(4):339-41. PubMed ID: 25270671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of cataract surgery and IOL implantation on the magnification of a fundus photograph: a pilot study.
Knaapi L; Lehtonen T; Vesti E
Acta Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 95(8):839-841. PubMed ID: 28371281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of the real size of fundus objects from fundus photographs.
Coleman AL; Haller JA; Quigley HA
J Glaucoma; 1996 Dec; 5(6):433-5. PubMed ID: 8946302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improvements on Littmann's method of determining the size of retinal features by fundus photography.
Bennett AG; Rudnicka AR; Edgar DF
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1994 Jun; 232(6):361-7. PubMed ID: 8082844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of optic disc parameters on digital fundus photographs: algorithm development and evaluation.
Bartling H; Wanger P; Martin L
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Dec; 86(8):837-41. PubMed ID: 19086927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computerised calculation scheme for ocular magnification with the Zeiss telecentric fundus camera.
Langenbucher A; Seitz B; Viestenz A
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2003 Sep; 23(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 12950891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new fundus camera technique to help calculate eye-camera magnification: a rapid means to measure disc size.
Quigley MG; Dube P
Arch Ophthalmol; 2003 May; 121(5):707-9. PubMed ID: 12742849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correction of optic disc measurements on fundus photographs.
Bengtsson B; Krakau CE
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1992; 230(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 1547963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring fundus landmarks.
Mansour AM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1990 Jan; 31(1):41-2. PubMed ID: 2298541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement of optic nerve head parameters: comparison of optical coherence tomography with digital planimetry.
Samarawickrama C; Pai A; Huynh SC; Burlutsky G; Jonas JB; Mitchell P
J Glaucoma; 2009; 18(8):571-5. PubMed ID: 19826383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Localized retinal morphology and differential light sensitivity in diabetic retinopathy. Methodology and clinical results.
Bek T
Acta Ophthalmol Suppl (1985); 1992; (207):1-36. PubMed ID: 1486330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing optic nerve-head-size measurements by the heidelberg retina tomograph with fundus photography performed with a novel focusing technique.
Quigley MG; Patel V; Dubé P; Wittich W; Harasymowycz P
J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):480-3. PubMed ID: 18794684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Construction of a model eye and its applications.
Rudnicka AR; Edgar DF; Bennett AG
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Oct; 12(4):485-90. PubMed ID: 1293539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The retinal disease screening study: retrospective comparison of nonmydriatic fundus photography and three-dimensional optical coherence tomography for detection of retinal irregularities.
Ouyang Y; Heussen FM; Keane PA; Sadda SR; Walsh AC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Aug; 54(8):5694-700. PubMed ID: 23847317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of quantitative mapping and stereoscopic fundus photography grading of retinal thickness in diabetic eyes with macular edema.
Yang Y; Vitale S; Ding Y; O'Connell SR; Alexander J; Bressler NM; Schachat AP; Zeimer R
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2003; 34(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 12569999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation of disc morphology quantified on stereophotographs to results by Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II, GDx variable corneal compensation, and visual field tests.
Saito H; Tsutsumi T; Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M
Ophthalmology; 2010 Feb; 117(2):282-9. PubMed ID: 19969361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnification characteristics of fundus imaging systems.
Rudnicka AR; Burk RO; Edgar DF; Fitzke FW
Ophthalmology; 1998 Dec; 105(12):2186-92. PubMed ID: 9855145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a portable fundus camera for use in the teleophthalmologic diagnosis of glaucoma.
Yogesan K; Constable IJ; Barry CJ; Eikelboom RH; Morgan W; Tay-Kearney ML; Jitskaia L
J Glaucoma; 1999 Oct; 8(5):297-301. PubMed ID: 10529928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accurate superimposition of perimetry data onto fundus photographs.
Bek T; Lund-Andersen H
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1990 Feb; 68(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 2336927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
