496 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25271286)
61. Functional variation in the gut microbiome of wild Drosophila populations.
Bost A; Martinson VG; Franzenburg S; Adair KL; Albasi A; Wells MT; Douglas AE
Mol Ecol; 2018 Jul; 27(13):2834-2845. PubMed ID: 29802796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Host genetic and environmental effects on mouse intestinal microbiota.
Campbell JH; Foster CM; Vishnivetskaya T; Campbell AG; Yang ZK; Wymore A; Palumbo AV; Chesler EJ; Podar M
ISME J; 2012 Nov; 6(11):2033-44. PubMed ID: 22695862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. The impact of genome variation and diet on the metabolic phenotype and microbiome composition of Drosophila melanogaster.
Jehrke L; Stewart FA; Droste A; Beller M
Sci Rep; 2018 Apr; 8(1):6215. PubMed ID: 29670218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Functional traits of the gut microbiome correlated with host lipid content in a natural population of
Kang D; Douglas AE
Biol Lett; 2020 Feb; 16(2):20190803. PubMed ID: 32097599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Drosophila-associated bacteria differentially shape the nutritional requirements of their host during juvenile growth.
Consuegra J; Grenier T; Baa-Puyoulet P; Rahioui I; Akherraz H; Gervais H; Parisot N; da Silva P; Charles H; Calevro F; Leulier F
PLoS Biol; 2020 Mar; 18(3):e3000681. PubMed ID: 32196485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Symbiotic bacteria are responsible for diet-induced mating preference in Drosophila melanogaster, providing support for the hologenome concept of evolution.
Sharon G; Segal D; Zilber-Rosenberg I; Rosenberg E
Gut Microbes; 2011; 2(3):190-2. PubMed ID: 21804354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Spatiotemporally Heterogeneous Population Dynamics of Gut Bacteria Inferred from Fecal Time Series Data.
Inamine H; Ellner SP; Newell PD; Luo Y; Buchon N; Douglas AE
mBio; 2018 Jan; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 29317508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. How gut microbiome interactions affect nutritional traits of
McMullen JG; Peters-Schulze G; Cai J; Patterson AD; Douglas AE
J Exp Biol; 2020 Oct; 223(Pt 19):. PubMed ID: 33051361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Microbiota disruption leads to reduced cold tolerance in Drosophila flies.
Henry Y; Colinet H
Naturwissenschaften; 2018 Sep; 105(9-10):59. PubMed ID: 30291448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Monoassociation with Lactobacillus plantarum Disrupts Intestinal Homeostasis in Adult Drosophila melanogaster.
Fast D; Duggal A; Foley E
mBio; 2018 Jul; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 30065090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. In vivo function and comparative genomic analyses of the Drosophila gut microbiota identify candidate symbiosis factors.
Newell PD; Chaston JM; Wang Y; Winans NJ; Sannino DR; Wong AC; Dobson AJ; Kagle J; Douglas AE
Front Microbiol; 2014; 5():576. PubMed ID: 25408687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. The taxophysiological paradox: changes in the intestinal microbiota of the xylophagous cockroach Cryptocercus punctulatus depending on the physiological state of the host.
Berlanga M; Paster BJ; Guerrero R
Int Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 12(4):227-36. PubMed ID: 20112227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Structural shifts of gut microbiota as surrogate endpoints for monitoring host health changes induced by carcinogen exposure.
Wei H; Dong L; Wang T; Zhang M; Hua W; Zhang C; Pang X; Chen M; Su M; Qiu Y; Zhou M; Yang S; Chen Z; Rantalainen M; Nicholson JK; Jia W; Wu D; Zhao L
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2010 Sep; 73(3):577-86. PubMed ID: 20629751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. A Distinctive and Host-Restricted Gut Microbiota in Populations of a Cactophilic Drosophila Species.
Martinson VG; Carpinteyro-Ponce J; Moran NA; Markow TA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Dec; 83(23):. PubMed ID: 28939605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Genome-Inferred Correspondence between Phylogeny and Metabolic Traits in the Wild Drosophila Gut Microbiome.
McMullen JG; Bueno E; Blow F; Douglas AE
Genome Biol Evol; 2021 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 34081101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Taxonomic and functional metagenomic profiling of gastrointestinal tract microbiome of the farmed adult turbot (Scophthalmus maximus).
Xing M; Hou Z; Yuan J; Liu Y; Qu Y; Liu B
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2013 Dec; 86(3):432-43. PubMed ID: 23802730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Murine gut microbiota is defined by host genetics and modulates variation of metabolic traits.
McKnite AM; Perez-Munoz ME; Lu L; Williams EG; Brewer S; Andreux PA; Bastiaansen JW; Wang X; Kachman SD; Auwerx J; Williams RW; Benson AK; Peterson DA; Ciobanu DC
PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e39191. PubMed ID: 22723961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Interaction Between Familial Transmission and a Constitutively Active Immune System Shapes Gut Microbiota in
Mistry R; Kounatidis I; Ligoxygakis P
Genetics; 2017 Jun; 206(2):889-904. PubMed ID: 28413160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Culture-dependent and metagenomic analysis of lesser horseshoe bats' gut microbiome revealing unique bacterial diversity and signatures of potential human pathogens.
Selvin J; Lanong S; Syiem D; De Mandal S; Kayang H; Kumar NS; Kiran GS
Microb Pathog; 2019 Dec; 137():103675. PubMed ID: 31473248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. The Nutritional Environment Influences the Impact of Microbes on Drosophila melanogaster Life Span.
Keebaugh ES; Yamada R; Ja WW
mBio; 2019 Jul; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 31289176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
