BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25272950)

  • 1. Mammography equipment design: impact on radiographers' practice.
    Costa S; Oliveira E; Reis C; Viegas S; Serranheira F
    Insights Imaging; 2014 Dec; 5(6):723-30. PubMed ID: 25272950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ergonomic strategies to improve radiographers' posture during mammography activities.
    Cernean N; Serranheira F; Gonçalves P; Sá Dos Reis C
    Insights Imaging; 2017 Aug; 8(4):429-438. PubMed ID: 28639113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiographers' musculoskeletal health in Western Switzerland: WRMSDs symptoms prevalence and risk factors.
    Fernandes K; Sá Dos Reis C; Serranheira F
    Work; 2023; 74(4):1527-1537. PubMed ID: 35661043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An investigation of radiographers' and radiologists' perceptions and attitudes in Kuwait towards extending radiographers' role in mammography.
    Muhanna AM; Brown PN; Pratt S
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):325-332. PubMed ID: 34782216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of radiographers' mammography practice in five European countries: a pilot study.
    Richli Meystre N; Henner A; Sà Dos Reis C; Strøm B; Pires Jorge JA; Kukkes T; Metsälä E
    Insights Imaging; 2019 Mar; 10(1):31. PubMed ID: 30868292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. European radiographers' challenges from mammography education and clinical practice - an integrative review.
    Metsälä E; Richli Meystre N; Pires Jorge J; Henner A; Kukkes T; Sá Dos Reis C
    Insights Imaging; 2017 Jun; 8(3):329-343. PubMed ID: 28303552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using automated software evaluation to improve the performance of breast radiographers in tomosynthesis screening.
    Gennaro G; Povolo L; Del Genio S; Ciampani L; Fasoli C; Carlevaris P; Petrioli M; Masiero T; Maggetto F; Caumo F
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 38019313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Overview of the radiographers' practice in 65 healthcare centers using digital mammography systems in Portugal.
    Sá Dos Reis C; Pascoal A; Radu L; de Oliveira MF; Alves J
    Insights Imaging; 2017 Jun; 8(3):345-355. PubMed ID: 28303553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of subjective image quality evaluation in mammography.
    Alukić E; Homar K; Pavić M; Žibert J; Mekiš N
    Radiography (Lond); 2023 May; 29(3):526-532. PubMed ID: 36913787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammography in females with an implanted medical device: impact on image quality, pain and anxiety.
    Paap E; Witjes M; van Landsveld-Verhoeven C; Pijnappel RM; Maas AH; Broeders MJ
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20160142. PubMed ID: 27452263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dose management software implementation in mammography.
    Samara ET; Tsapaki V; Sramek D
    Phys Med; 2019 Dec; 68():88-95. PubMed ID: 31765886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiographers' perception on task shifting to nurses and assistant nurses within the radiography profession.
    Møller Christensen B; Pettersson T; Bjällmark A
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 May; 27(2):310-315. PubMed ID: 32958399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consensus about image quality assessment criteria of breast implants mammography using Delphi method with radiographers and radiologists.
    Sá Dos Reis C; Gremion I; Richli Meystre N
    Insights Imaging; 2020 Apr; 11(1):56. PubMed ID: 32246276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using breast radiographers' reports as a second opinion for radiologists' readings of microcalcifications in digital mammography.
    Tanaka R; Takamori M; Uchiyama Y; Nishikawa RM; Shiraishi J
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 88(1047):20140565. PubMed ID: 25536443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A self-directed learning intervention for radiographers rating mammographic breast density.
    Ekpo EU; Hogg P; Wasike E; McEntee MF
    Radiography (Lond); 2017 Nov; 23(4):337-342. PubMed ID: 28965898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of breast positioning criteria in mammographic screening: Agreement between artificial intelligence software and radiographers.
    Waade GG; Danielsen AS; Holen ÅS; Larsen M; Hanestad B; Hopland NM; Kalcheva V; Hofvind S
    J Med Screen; 2021 Dec; 28(4):448-455. PubMed ID: 33715511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast compression and radiation dose in two different mammographic oblique projections: 45 and 60 degrees.
    Brnić Z; Hebrang A
    Eur J Radiol; 2001 Oct; 40(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 11673002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association between musculoskeletal pain and exposures to awkward postures during work: a compositional analysis approach.
    Lohne FK; Xu K; Fimland MS; Palarea-Albaladejo J; Redzovic S
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2024 Jun; 68(5):522-534. PubMed ID: 38603465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiographers' perceptions of their professional rights in diagnostic radiography: a qualitative interview study.
    Matilainen K; Ahonen SM; Kankkunen P; Kangasniemi M
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2017 Mar; 31(1):139-145. PubMed ID: 27164407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic radiographers' experience of COVID-19, Gauteng South Africa.
    Lewis S; Mulla F
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 May; 27(2):346-351. PubMed ID: 33004276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.