These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25272950)

  • 1. Mammography equipment design: impact on radiographers' practice.
    Costa S; Oliveira E; Reis C; Viegas S; Serranheira F
    Insights Imaging; 2014 Dec; 5(6):723-30. PubMed ID: 25272950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ergonomic strategies to improve radiographers' posture during mammography activities.
    Cernean N; Serranheira F; Gonçalves P; Sá Dos Reis C
    Insights Imaging; 2017 Aug; 8(4):429-438. PubMed ID: 28639113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiographers' musculoskeletal health in Western Switzerland: WRMSDs symptoms prevalence and risk factors.
    Fernandes K; Sá Dos Reis C; Serranheira F
    Work; 2023; 74(4):1527-1537. PubMed ID: 35661043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An investigation of radiographers' and radiologists' perceptions and attitudes in Kuwait towards extending radiographers' role in mammography.
    Muhanna AM; Brown PN; Pratt S
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):325-332. PubMed ID: 34782216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of radiographers' mammography practice in five European countries: a pilot study.
    Richli Meystre N; Henner A; Sà Dos Reis C; Strøm B; Pires Jorge JA; Kukkes T; Metsälä E
    Insights Imaging; 2019 Mar; 10(1):31. PubMed ID: 30868292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using automated software evaluation to improve the performance of breast radiographers in tomosynthesis screening.
    Gennaro G; Povolo L; Del Genio S; Ciampani L; Fasoli C; Carlevaris P; Petrioli M; Masiero T; Maggetto F; Caumo F
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jul; 34(7):4738-4749. PubMed ID: 38019313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. European radiographers' challenges from mammography education and clinical practice - an integrative review.
    Metsälä E; Richli Meystre N; Pires Jorge J; Henner A; Kukkes T; Sá Dos Reis C
    Insights Imaging; 2017 Jun; 8(3):329-343. PubMed ID: 28303552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Overview of the radiographers' practice in 65 healthcare centers using digital mammography systems in Portugal.
    Sá Dos Reis C; Pascoal A; Radu L; de Oliveira MF; Alves J
    Insights Imaging; 2017 Jun; 8(3):345-355. PubMed ID: 28303553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of subjective image quality evaluation in mammography.
    Alukić E; Homar K; Pavić M; Žibert J; Mekiš N
    Radiography (Lond); 2023 May; 29(3):526-532. PubMed ID: 36913787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammography in females with an implanted medical device: impact on image quality, pain and anxiety.
    Paap E; Witjes M; van Landsveld-Verhoeven C; Pijnappel RM; Maas AH; Broeders MJ
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20160142. PubMed ID: 27452263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dose management software implementation in mammography.
    Samara ET; Tsapaki V; Sramek D
    Phys Med; 2019 Dec; 68():88-95. PubMed ID: 31765886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiographers' perception on task shifting to nurses and assistant nurses within the radiography profession.
    Møller Christensen B; Pettersson T; Bjällmark A
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 May; 27(2):310-315. PubMed ID: 32958399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consensus about image quality assessment criteria of breast implants mammography using Delphi method with radiographers and radiologists.
    Sá Dos Reis C; Gremion I; Richli Meystre N
    Insights Imaging; 2020 Apr; 11(1):56. PubMed ID: 32246276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using breast radiographers' reports as a second opinion for radiologists' readings of microcalcifications in digital mammography.
    Tanaka R; Takamori M; Uchiyama Y; Nishikawa RM; Shiraishi J
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 88(1047):20140565. PubMed ID: 25536443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Australian radiographers' digital era practice in selecting the image receptor angle for female body habitus for the mediolateral oblique view of the breast.
    Pape R
    Radiography (Lond); 2024 Oct; 30(6):1612-1621. PubMed ID: 39413569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A self-directed learning intervention for radiographers rating mammographic breast density.
    Ekpo EU; Hogg P; Wasike E; McEntee MF
    Radiography (Lond); 2017 Nov; 23(4):337-342. PubMed ID: 28965898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of breast positioning criteria in mammographic screening: Agreement between artificial intelligence software and radiographers.
    Waade GG; Danielsen AS; Holen ÅS; Larsen M; Hanestad B; Hopland NM; Kalcheva V; Hofvind S
    J Med Screen; 2021 Dec; 28(4):448-455. PubMed ID: 33715511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast compression and radiation dose in two different mammographic oblique projections: 45 and 60 degrees.
    Brnić Z; Hebrang A
    Eur J Radiol; 2001 Oct; 40(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 11673002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiographers' perceptions of their professional rights in diagnostic radiography: a qualitative interview study.
    Matilainen K; Ahonen SM; Kankkunen P; Kangasniemi M
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2017 Mar; 31(1):139-145. PubMed ID: 27164407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic radiographers' experience of COVID-19, Gauteng South Africa.
    Lewis S; Mulla F
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 May; 27(2):346-351. PubMed ID: 33004276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.