BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25273039)

  • 1. In vitro comparison of fracture load of implant-supported, zirconia-based, porcelain- and composite-layered restorations after artificial aging.
    Komine F; Taguchi K; Fushiki R; Kamio S; Iwasaki T; Matsumura H
    Dent Mater J; 2014; 33(5):607-13. PubMed ID: 25273039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported zirconia-based indirect composite-layered molar restorations.
    Taguchi K; Komine F; Fushiki R; Blatz MB; Kamio S; Matsumura H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Aug; 25(8):983-91. PubMed ID: 23730807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of framework design and layering material on fracture strength of implant-supported zirconia-based molar crowns.
    Kamio S; Komine F; Taguchi K; Iwasaki T; Blatz MB; Matsumura H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Dec; 26(12):1407-13. PubMed ID: 25115334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of framework design on fracture load after thermal cycling and mechanical loading of implant-supported zirconia-based prostheses.
    Komine F; Kamio S; Takata H; Yagawa S; Taguchi S; Taguchi K; Hashiguchi A; Matsumura H
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Jan; 37(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 28883302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture resistance of implant-supported screw-retained zirconia-based molar restorations.
    Honda J; Komine F; Kamio S; Taguchi K; Blatz MB; Matsumura H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1119-1126. PubMed ID: 27412687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
    Larsson C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: an in vitro study.
    Att W; Kurun S; Gerds T; Strub JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 16473084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro evaluation of fracture load of implant-supported zirconia-based prostheses fabricated with different veneer materials.
    Takata H; Komine F; Honda J; Blatz MB; Matsumura H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Apr; 29(4):396-403. PubMed ID: 29484710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Ceramic versus Titanium Implant Abutments and Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
    Sghaireen MG
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 24118925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of surface treatment on the retention of implant-supported zirconia restorations over short abutments.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Jabbari E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 24388717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Features of fracture of prosthetic tooth-endocrown constructions by means of acoustic emission analysis.
    Skalskyi V; Makeev V; Stankevych O; Pavlychko R
    Dent Mater; 2018 Mar; 34(3):e46-e55. PubMed ID: 29409675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture mode during cyclic loading of implant-supported single-tooth restorations.
    Hosseini M; Kleven E; Gotfredsen K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Aug; 108(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 22867804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings--a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations.
    Beuer F; Schweiger J; Eichberger M; Kappert HF; Gernet W; Edelhoff D
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 18620748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of aging on the fracture resistance of different types of screw-cement-retained implant-supported zirconia-based restorations.
    Sahebi S; Giti R; Sherafati A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0270527. PubMed ID: 35749553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture Strength of Zirconia and Alumina Ceramic Crowns Supported by Implants.
    Traini T; Sorrentino R; Gherlone E; Perfetti F; Bollero P; Zarone F
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():352-9. PubMed ID: 24779915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture load of monolithic CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic crowns and veneered zirconia crowns as a posterior implant restoration.
    Kim JH; Lee SJ; Park JS; Ryu JJ
    Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 23296031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical performance of cement- and screw-retained all-ceramic single crowns on dental implants.
    Obermeier M; Ristow O; Erdelt K; Beuer F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):981-991. PubMed ID: 28710653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations after exposure to the artificial mouth.
    Att W; Kurun S; Gerds T; Strub JR
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 May; 33(5):380-6. PubMed ID: 16629897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of novel-design anterior single-tooth implant restorations: influence of material selection for type III veneers bonded to zirconia abutments.
    Magne P; Paranhos MP; Burnett LH; Magne M; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Feb; 22(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 21044162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Internal coating of zirconia restoration with silica-based ceramic improves bonding of resin cement to dental zirconia ceramic.
    Kitayama S; Nikaido T; Ikeda M; Alireza S; Miura H; Tagami J
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2010; 20(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 20592445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.