These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25273409)

  • 1. Excitation energies from particle-particle random phase approximation: Davidson algorithm and benchmark studies.
    Yang Y; Peng D; Lu J; Yang W
    J Chem Phys; 2014 Sep; 141(12):124104. PubMed ID: 25273409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Singlet-triplet energy gaps for diradicals from particle-particle random phase approximation.
    Yang Y; Peng D; Davidson ER; Yang W
    J Phys Chem A; 2015 May; 119(20):4923-32. PubMed ID: 25891638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benchmark tests and spin adaptation for the particle-particle random phase approximation.
    Yang Y; van Aggelen H; Steinmann SN; Peng D; Yang W
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Nov; 139(17):174110. PubMed ID: 24206290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Double, Rydberg and charge transfer excitations from pairing matrix fluctuation and particle-particle random phase approximation.
    Yang Y; van Aggelen H; Yang W
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Dec; 139(22):224105. PubMed ID: 24329054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Charge transfer excitations from particle-particle random phase approximation-Opportunities and challenges arising from two-electron deficient systems.
    Yang Y; Dominguez A; Zhang D; Lutsker V; Niehaus TA; Frauenheim T; Yang W
    J Chem Phys; 2017 Mar; 146(12):124104. PubMed ID: 28388105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Linear-response time-dependent density-functional theory with pairing fields.
    Peng D; van Aggelen H; Yang Y; Yang W
    J Chem Phys; 2014 May; 140(18):18A522. PubMed ID: 24832330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exchange-correlation energy from pairing matrix fluctuation and the particle-particle random phase approximation.
    van Aggelen H; Yang Y; Yang W
    J Chem Phys; 2014 May; 140(18):18A511. PubMed ID: 24832319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Restricted second random phase approximations and Tamm-Dancoff approximations for electronic excitation energy calculations.
    Peng D; Yang Y; Zhang P; Yang W
    J Chem Phys; 2014 Dec; 141(21):214102. PubMed ID: 25481124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analytic gradients, geometry optimization and excited state potential energy surfaces from the particle-particle random phase approximation.
    Zhang D; Peng D; Zhang P; Yang W
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2015 Jan; 17(2):1025-38. PubMed ID: 25410624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Beyond Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory Using Only Single Excitations: Methods for Computational Studies of Excited States in Complex Systems.
    Herbert JM; Zhang X; Morrison AF; Liu J
    Acc Chem Res; 2016 May; 49(5):931-41. PubMed ID: 27100899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Excitation energies from particle-particle random phase approximation with accurate optimized effective potentials.
    Jin Y; Yang Y; Zhang D; Peng D; Yang W
    J Chem Phys; 2017 Oct; 147(13):134105. PubMed ID: 28987104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Valence excitation energies of alkenes, carbonyl compounds, and azabenzenes by time-dependent density functional theory: linear response of the ground state compared to collinear and noncollinear spin-flip TDDFT with the Tamm-Dancoff approximation.
    Isegawa M; Truhlar DG
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Apr; 138(13):134111. PubMed ID: 23574212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accurate Treatment of Charge-Transfer Excitations and Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence Using the Particle-Particle Random Phase Approximation.
    Al-Saadon R; Sutton C; Yang W
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Jun; 14(6):3196-3204. PubMed ID: 29772183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of local hybrid functionals for TDDFT calculations of electronic excitation energies.
    Maier TM; Bahmann H; Arbuznikov AV; Kaupp M
    J Chem Phys; 2016 Feb; 144(7):074106. PubMed ID: 26896975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Excitation Energies from the Single-Particle Green's Function with the GW Approximation.
    Jin Y; Yang W
    J Phys Chem A; 2019 Apr; 123(14):3199-3204. PubMed ID: 30920830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Charge transfer excitation energies from ground state density functional theory calculations.
    Mei Y; Yang W
    J Chem Phys; 2019 Apr; 150(14):144109. PubMed ID: 30981264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calculation of atomic excitation energies by time-dependent density functional theory within a modified linear response.
    Hu C; Sugino O; Tateyama Y
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2009 Feb; 21(6):064229. PubMed ID: 21715931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response calculations based on an independent particle system with the exact one-particle density matrix: excitation energies.
    Giesbertz KJ; Gritsenko OV; Baerends EJ
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Mar; 136(9):094104. PubMed ID: 22401426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Molecular Excitation Energies from Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory Employing Random-Phase Approximation Hessians with Exact Exchange.
    Heßelmann A
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Apr; 11(4):1607-20. PubMed ID: 26574370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficient time-dependent density functional theory approximations for hybrid density functionals: analytical gradients and parallelization.
    Petrenko T; Kossmann S; Neese F
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Feb; 134(5):054116. PubMed ID: 21303101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.