These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25273419)

  • 1. Robust and efficient variational fitting of Fock exchange.
    Mejía-Rodríguez D; Köster AM
    J Chem Phys; 2014 Sep; 141(12):124114. PubMed ID: 25273419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variational and robust density fitting of four-center two-electron integrals in local metrics.
    Reine S; Tellgren E; Krapp A; Kjaergaard T; Helgaker T; Jansik B; Host S; Salek P
    J Chem Phys; 2008 Sep; 129(10):104101. PubMed ID: 19044902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Low-cost evaluation of the exchange Fock matrix from Cholesky and density fitting representations of the electron repulsion integrals.
    Aquilante F; Pedersen TB; Lindh R
    J Chem Phys; 2007 May; 126(19):194106. PubMed ID: 17523797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implementation of screened hybrid density functional for periodic systems with numerical atomic orbitals: basis function fitting and integral screening.
    Shang H; Li Z; Yang J
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Jul; 135(3):034110. PubMed ID: 21786990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Large-scale Dirac-Fock-Breit method using density fitting and 2-spinor basis functions.
    Kelley MS; Shiozaki T
    J Chem Phys; 2013 May; 138(20):204113. PubMed ID: 23742460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variational fitting of the Fock exchange potential with modified Cholesky decomposition.
    Pedroza-Montero JN; Delesma FA; Morales JL; Calaminici P; Köster AM
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Oct; 153(13):134112. PubMed ID: 33032430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of numerical approximation on the calculation of overlap integrals with noninteger Slater-type orbitals.
    Bağcı A; Hoggan PE
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2014 May; 89(5):053307. PubMed ID: 25353914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cholesky decomposition of the two-electron integral matrix in electronic structure calculations.
    Røeggen I; Johansen T
    J Chem Phys; 2008 May; 128(19):194107. PubMed ID: 18500856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robust Periodic Hartree-Fock Exchange for Large-Scale Simulations Using Gaussian Basis Sets.
    Guidon M; Hutter J; VandeVondele J
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2009 Nov; 5(11):3010-21. PubMed ID: 26609981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linear-scaling calculation of Hartree-Fock exchange energy with non-orthogonal generalised Wannier functions.
    Dziedzic J; Hill Q; Skylaris CK
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Dec; 139(21):214103. PubMed ID: 24320360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The limitations of Slater's element-dependent exchange functional from analytic density-functional theory.
    Zope RR; Dunlap BI
    J Chem Phys; 2006 Jan; 124(4):044107. PubMed ID: 16460149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-Consistent Auxiliary Density Perturbation Theory.
    Delesma FA; Delgado-Venegas RI; Salahub DR; Del Campo JM; Pedroza-Montero JN; Calaminici P; Köster AM
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Nov; 17(11):6934-6946. PubMed ID: 34709812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetizability and rotational g tensors for density fitted local second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory using gauge-including atomic orbitals.
    Loibl S; Schütz M
    J Chem Phys; 2014 Jul; 141(2):024108. PubMed ID: 25028000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robust Periodic Fock Exchange with Atom-Centered Gaussian Basis Sets.
    Irmler A; Burow AM; Pauly F
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Sep; 14(9):4567-4580. PubMed ID: 30080979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attractive electron-electron interactions within robust local fitting approximations.
    Merlot P; Kjærgaard T; Helgaker T; Lindh R; Aquilante F; Reine S; Pedersen TB
    J Comput Chem; 2013 Jun; 34(17):1486-96. PubMed ID: 23553369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust and efficient density fitting.
    Domínguez-Soria VD; Geudtner G; Morales JL; Calaminici P; Köster AM
    J Chem Phys; 2009 Sep; 131(12):124102. PubMed ID: 19791847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calculation of exchange-correlation potentials with auxiliary function densities.
    Köster AM; Reveles JU; del Campo JM
    J Chem Phys; 2004 Aug; 121(8):3417-24. PubMed ID: 15303904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interpolative Separable Density Fitting Decomposition for Accelerating Hartree-Fock Exchange Calculations within Numerical Atomic Orbitals.
    Qin X; Liu J; Hu W; Yang J
    J Phys Chem A; 2020 Jul; 124(27):5664-5674. PubMed ID: 32538084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semi-exact concentric atomic density fitting: reduced cost and increased accuracy compared to standard density fitting.
    Hollman DS; Schaefer HF; Valeev EF
    J Chem Phys; 2014 Feb; 140(6):064109. PubMed ID: 24527902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reduced explicitly correlated Hartree-Fock approach within the nuclear-electronic orbital framework: theoretical formulation.
    Sirjoosingh A; Pak MV; Swalina C; Hammes-Schiffer S
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Jul; 139(3):034102. PubMed ID: 23883005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.