505 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25273657)
1. [Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
Lin J; Kang M; Lin J; Chen S; Deng F; Han W; Lin R
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 17(9):888-91. PubMed ID: 25273657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
Zhou JM; Jing SJ; Lu QT; Chu X; Xue T
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 44(6):577-580. PubMed ID: 35754233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Use of gastric tube in construction technique thoracoscopic and laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy].
Rong B; Guo M; Wu X
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 20(8):876-879. PubMed ID: 28836245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of short-term outcomes between Ivor-Lewis and McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Zhai C; Liu Y; Li W; Xu T; Yang G; Lu H; Hu D
J Thorac Dis; 2015 Dec; 7(12):2352-8. PubMed ID: 26793358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy and McKeown Esophagectomy for Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.
Hong Z; Cui B; Wang K; Bai X; Yang N; Zhang Y; Wu X; Cheng T; Jin D; Zhao J; Gou Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Dec; 30(13):8271-8277. PubMed ID: 37698668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of overlap anastomosis in digestive tract reconstruction during minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.
Ding J; Dai C; Cao W; Zhao X
Updates Surg; 2024 Apr; 76(2):495-503. PubMed ID: 37698809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis and McKeown oesophagectomy in Chinese patients with stage IA-IIIB oesophageal squamous cell cancer: a multicentre, non-interventional and observational study.
Zhang T; Hou X; Li Y; Fu X; Liu L; Xu L; Liu Y
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 30(6):812-819. PubMed ID: 32285107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of short-term outcomes between minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy and Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
Peng X; Chen Y; Nassor Juma A; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Jiao Y; Zhang W; Zhuang W
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 May; 42(5):546-552. PubMed ID: 28626101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: initial experience from China.
Li H; Hu B; You B; Miao JB; Fu YL; Chen QR
Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Apr; 125(8):1376-80. PubMed ID: 22613638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. McKeown or Ivor Lewis totally minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: systematic review and meta-analysis.
van Workum F; Berkelmans GH; Klarenbeek BR; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Luyer MDP; Rosman C
J Thorac Dis; 2017 Jul; 9(Suppl 8):S826-S833. PubMed ID: 28815080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Efficacy comparison of Sweet versus Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in the treatment of middle-lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].
Yang X; Zhan C; Sun F; Chen L; Shi M; Jiang W; Wang Q
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):979-984. PubMed ID: 27680063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Single Intercostal Space Thoracoscopic Approach for Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.
Pan S; Wang L; Wu M; Wang Q; Shen G; Chen G
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Nov; 27(11):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 28504587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved anastomotic leakage rates after the "flap and wrap" reconstruction in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer.
Slaman AE; Eshuis WJ; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS
Dis Esophagus; 2022 Dec; 36(1):. PubMed ID: 35724430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. McKeown Versus Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Patients with a History of Total Pharyngolaryngectomy: A Comparison Study.
Kuriyama K; Okamura A; Kanie Y; Maruyama S; Sakamoto K; Kanamori J; Imamura Y; Watanabe M
World J Surg; 2023 Oct; 47(10):2479-2487. PubMed ID: 37432423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A preliminary experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Tapias LF; Morse CR
Dis Esophagus; 2012 Jul; 25(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 21967644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of Patients with Anastomotic Leakage After Transhiatal, McKeown or Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study.
Verstegen MHP; Slaman AE; Klarenbeek BR; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Rosman C; van Workum F
World J Surg; 2021 Nov; 45(11):3341-3349. PubMed ID: 34373937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short-term outcomes of Ivor Lewis vs. McKeown esophagectomy: A meta-analysis.
Xing H; Hu M; Wang Z; Jiang Y
Front Surg; 2022; 9():950108. PubMed ID: 36386496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Abdominothoracic esophageal resection according to Ivor Lewis with intrathoracic anastomosis : standardized totally minimally invasive technique].
Runkel N; Walz M; Ketelhut M
Chirurg; 2015 May; 86(5):468-75. PubMed ID: 24994588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
