BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25274134)

  • 21. Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis and predictors of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy for cancer.
    Gooszen JAH; Goense L; Gisbertz SS; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R; van Berge Henegouwen MI
    Br J Surg; 2018 Apr; 105(5):552-560. PubMed ID: 29412450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Omentoplasty versus no omentoplasty for esophagogastrostomy after surgery for cancer of cardia and esophagus.
    Thakur B; Zhang CS; Tan ZB
    Indian J Cancer; 2004; 41(4):167-9. PubMed ID: 15659870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modifications in retrosternal reconstruction after oesophagogastrectomy may reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage.
    Hu H; Ye T; Zhang Y; Zhang J; Luketich JD; Chen H
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Aug; 42(2):359-63. PubMed ID: 22345283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Effect of Omentoplasty on the Rate of Anastomotic Leakage after Intestinal Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Nasiri S; Mirminachi B; Taherimehr R; Shadbakhsh R; Hojat M
    Am Surg; 2017 Feb; 83(2):157-161. PubMed ID: 28228202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Laparoscopic versus open resection for sigmoid diverticulitis.
    Abraha I; Binda GA; Montedori A; Arezzo A; Cirocchi R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 11(11):CD009277. PubMed ID: 29178125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Anastomosis oversewing technique to prevent leakage after oesophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Tu DH; Qu R; Ping W; Yang G; Fu X; Cai Y
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 May; 61(5):990-998. PubMed ID: 35325107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy: Influence of omentoplasty in propensity-weighted cohorts.
    Lu M; Luketich JD; Levy RM; Awais O; Sarkaria I; Visintainer P; Nason KS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 May; 159(5):2096-2105. PubMed ID: 31932061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
    Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A novel technique for cervical gastro-oesophageal anastomosis during minimally invasive oesophagectomy.
    Wang ZQ; Jiang YQ; Xu W; Cai HR; Zhang Z; Yin Z; Zhang Q
    Int J Surg; 2018 May; 53():221-229. PubMed ID: 29609046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Omentoplasty to reduce anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis.
    Sahebally SM; Chan E; Azmir A; Lu CT; Doudle M; Naik A; Nolan G; Von Papen M
    ANZ J Surg; 2022 Jul; 92(7-8):1651-1657. PubMed ID: 35170188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.
    Yuan Y; Zeng XX; Zhao YF; Chen LQ
    World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3164-3170. PubMed ID: 28721567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Superiority of Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy in Reducing In-Hospital Mortality of Patients with Resectable Oesophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
    Zhou C; Zhang L; Wang H; Ma X; Shi B; Chen W; He J; Wang K; Liu P; Ren Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132889. PubMed ID: 26196135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of cervical anastomotic leak and stenosis after oesophagectomy for carcinoma according to the interval of the stomach ischaemic conditioning.
    Prochazka V; Marek F; Kunovsky L; Svaton R; Grolich T; Moravcik P; Farkasova M; Kala Z
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2018 Sep; 100(7):509-514. PubMed ID: 29909668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prospective randomized study of one- or two-layer anastomosis following oesophageal resection and cervical oesophagogastrostomy.
    Zieren HU; Müller JM; Pichlmaier H
    Br J Surg; 1993 May; 80(5):608-11. PubMed ID: 8518900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impaired healing of cervical oesophagogastrostomies can be predicted by estimation of gastric serosal blood perfusion by laser Doppler flowmetry.
    Pierie JP; De Graaf PW; Poen H; Van der Tweel I; Obertop H
    Eur J Surg; 1994 Nov; 160(11):599-603. PubMed ID: 7858044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Omentoplasty versus no omentoplasty for cervical esophagogastrostomy following radical esophagectomy.
    Ohwada S; Ogawa T; Kawate S; Koyama T; Yamada T; Yoshimura S; Sato Y; Tomizawa N; Ohya T; Morishita Y
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2002; 49(43):181-4. PubMed ID: 11941948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Gastric ischemic preconditioning may reduce the incidence and severity of anastomotic leakage after οesophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Michalinos A; Antoniou SA; Ntourakis D; Schizas D; Ekmektzoglou K; Angouridis A; Johnson EO
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Oct; 33(10):. PubMed ID: 32372088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of narrowed gastric conduits on anastomotic leakage following minimally invasive oesophagectomy.
    Shen Y; Wang H; Feng M; Tan L; Wang Q
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2014 Aug; 19(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 24847029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Anastomotic techniques for oesophagectomy for malignancy: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Kamarajah SK; Bundred JR; Singh P; Pasquali S; Griffiths EA
    BJS Open; 2020 Aug; 4(4):563-576. PubMed ID: 32445431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Baseball bat-like gastric tube for end-to-side oesophageal-gastric anastomosis decreased risks of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: A retrospective propensity score matched comparative study with 613 patients.
    Lai Y; Li H; Tian L; Ye X; Hu Y
    Int J Surg; 2022 Feb; 98():106227. PubMed ID: 35041978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.